Literature DB >> 30124237

The role of routine imaging in pediatric cutaneous melanoma.

Hadeel Halalsheh1, Sue C Kaste2,3, Fariba Navid4,5, Armita Bahrami6, Barry L Shulkin2,3, Bhaskar Rao7, Michelle Kunkel8, Nathan Artz2, Alberto Pappo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal imaging for children with pediatric malignant melanoma (MM) is unknown.
METHODS: We reviewed clinical and imaging findings of patients with American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIC-IV MM treated on our institutional MEL06 trial. All patients had baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography (MRI/CT), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CTCAP). Patients on stratum A (PEG-interferon, where PEG is pegylated; AJCC IIC, IIIA, IIIB; n = 16) had imaging every 6 months; stratum B1 (PEG-interferon and temozolomide; unresectable measurable disease, metastatic, or recurrent; n = 2) had PET/CT scans every 2 months and brain imaging studies every 4 months; stratum B2 patients (PEG-interferon and temozolomide; unresectable nonmeasurable, metastatic, or recurrent, n = 3) had imaging every 4 months. Off-therapy imaging was done every 6 months for 3 years.
RESULTS: There were 21 patients (11 females, 11 spitzoid, median age 14 years, head/neck [6], trunk [7], extremities [8]). Patients with spitzoid melanoma underwent 236 imaging studies in total (86 PET/CT, 81 CTCAP, 11 CT chest, 10 CT brain, 48 MRI brain) at a median cost per patient of $32,718. Thirteen studies (5.8%) had findings that led to two biopsies (one positive). For conventional MM, 162 studies (61 PET/CT, 57 CTCAP, 8 CT chest, 7 CT brain, and 29 MRI brain) were performed with a median cost per patient of $23,420. Twenty (14%) had findings leading to six biopsies (four positive). At 6.3 years (range 0.4-9.2), 17 patients remain disease-free.
CONCLUSION: Children with spitzoid melanoma require minimal imaging at diagnosis and follow-up. Patients with conventional MM should be imaged according to adult guidelines.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; imaging; melanoma; spitzoid

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30124237      PMCID: PMC6193828          DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  37 in total

1.  The utility of ancillary tests in monitoring cutaneous melanoma patients to detect visceral metastasis.

Authors:  J R Ferreres; J Marcoval; K Fodge; M Ochoa de Olza; A Viñals; A Fabra
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Is detection of melanoma metastasis during surveillance in an early phase of development associated with a survival benefit?

Authors:  Ulrike Leiter; Petra G Buettner; Thomas K Eigentler; Andrea Forschner; Friedegund Meier; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.599

3.  Melanoma Incidence in Children and Adolescents: Decreasing Trends in the United States.

Authors:  Laura B Campbell; Kathryn L Kreicher; Haley R Gittleman; Kyle Strodtbeck; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Jeremy S Bordeaux
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 4.  Follow-up in patients with localised primary cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Anne Brecht Francken; Esther Bastiaannet; Harald J Hoekstra
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Xing; Yulia Bronstein; Merrick I Ross; Robert L Askew; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard Royal; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Prognostic factors in metastatic melanoma: a pooled analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trials.

Authors:  J Manola; M Atkins; J Ibrahim; J Kirkwood
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Detection of first relapse in cutaneous melanoma patients: implications for the formulation of evidence-based follow-up guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Brecht Francken; Helen M Shaw; Neil A Accortt; Seng-Jaw Soong; Harald J Hoekstra; John F Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  The inappropriate use of imaging studies: a report of the 2004 Intersociety Conference.

Authors:  N Reed Dunnick; Kimberly E Applegate; Ronald L Arenson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of pediatric cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16

2.  Malignant Melanoma in Children and Adolescents Treated in Pediatric Oncology Centers: An Australian and New Zealand Children's Oncology Group (ANZCHOG) Study.

Authors:  Anne L Ryan; Charlotte Burns; Aditya K Gupta; Ruvishani Samarasekera; David S Ziegler; Maria L Kirby; Frank Alvaro; Peter Downie; Stephen J Laughton; Siobhan Cross; Timothy Hassall; Geoff B McCowage; Jordan R Hansford; Rishi S Kotecha; Nicholas G Gottardo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.