Literature DB >> 12960544

Effects of sevoflurane, propofol, and adjunct nitrous oxide on regional cerebral blood flow, oxygen consumption, and blood volume in humans.

Kaike K Kaisti1, Jaakko W Långsjö, Sargo Aalto, Vesa Oikonen, Hannu Sipilä, Mika Teräs, Susanna Hinkka, Liisa Metsähonkala, Harry Scheinin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic agents, especially volatile anesthetics and nitrous oxide (N2O), are suspected to perturb cerebral homeostasis and vascular reactivity. The authors quantified the effects of sevoflurane and propofol as sole anesthetics and in combination with N2O on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), metabolic rate of oxygen (rCMRO2), and blood volume (rCBV) in the living human brain using positron emission tomography.
METHODS: 15O-labeled water, oxygen, and carbon monoxide were used as positron emission tomography tracers to determine rCBF, rCMRO2 and rCBV, respectively, in eight healthy male subjects during the awake state (baseline) and at four different anesthetic regimens: (1) sevoflurane alone, (2) sevoflurane plus 70% N2O (S+N), (3) propofol alone, and (4) propofol plus 70% N2O (P+N). Sevoflurane and propofol were titrated to keep a constant hypnotic depth (Bispectral Index 40) throughout anesthesia. End-tidal carbon dioxide was strictly kept at preinduction level.
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane was 1.5 +/- 0.3% during sevoflurane alone and 1.2 +/- 0.3% during S+N (P < 0.001). The measured propofol concentration was 3.7 +/- 0.7 microg/ml during propofol alone and 3.5 +/- 0.7 microg/ml during P+N (not significant). Sevoflurane alone decreased rCBF in some (to 73-80% of baseline, P < 0.01), and propofol in all brain structures (to 53-70%, P < 0.001). Only propofol reduced also rCBV (in the cortex and cerebellum to 83-86% of baseline, P < 0.05). Both sevoflurane and propofol similarly reduced rCMRO2 in all brain areas to 56-70% and 50-68% of baseline, respectively (P < 0.05). The adjunct N2O counteracted some of the rCMRO2 and rCBF reductions caused by drugs alone, and especially during S+N, a widespread reduction (P < 0.05 for all cortex and cerebellum vs. awake) in the oxygen extraction fraction was seen. Adding of N2O did not alter the rCBV effects of sevoflurane and propofol alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Propofol reduced rCBF and rCMRO2 comparably. Sevoflurane reduced rCBF less than propofol but rCMRO2 to an extent similar to propofol. These reductions in flow and metabolism were partly attenuated by adjunct N2O. S+N especially reduced the oxygen extraction fraction, suggesting disturbed flow-activity coupling in humans at a moderate depth of anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12960544     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200309000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  90 in total

1.  Effects of various anesthetic protocols on 18F-flurodeoxyglucose uptake into the brains and hearts of normal miniature pigs (Sus scrofa domestica).

Authors:  Young Ah Lee; Jong-In Kim; Jae-Won Lee; Yoon Ju Cho; Byeong Han Lee; Hyun Woo Chung; Keun-Kyu Park; Jin Soo Han
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Stable and dynamic cortical electrophysiology of induction and emergence with propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  Jonathan D Breshears; Jarod L Roland; Mohit Sharma; Charles M Gaona; Zachary V Freudenburg; Rene Tempelhoff; Michael S Avidan; Eric C Leuthardt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The effect of desflurane versus propofol on regional cerebral oxygenation in the sitting position for shoulder arthroscopy.

Authors:  Ji Young Kim; Jong Seok Lee; Kyung Cheon Lee; Hong Soon Kim; Seung Hyun Kim; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Altered metabolomic profiles may be associated with sevoflurane-induced neurotoxicity in neonatal rats.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Yuechao Gu; Hongyan Xiao; Xi Lei; Weimin Liang; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Effect of propofol on the medial temporal lobe emotional memory system: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human subjects.

Authors:  K O Pryor; J C Root; M Mehta; E Stern; H Pan; R A Veselis; D A Silbersweig
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Effect of mild hypocapnia on hemodynamic and bispectral index responses to tracheal intubation during propofol anesthesia in children.

Authors:  Hyun Jeong Kwak; Ji Young Kim; Kyung Cheon Lee; Hong Soon Kim; Jong Yeop Kim
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Anesthetic effects on regional CBF, BOLD, and the coupling between task-induced changes in CBF and BOLD: an fMRI study in normal human subjects.

Authors:  Maolin Qiu; Ramachandran Ramani; Michael Swetye; Nallakkandi Rajeevan; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Attenuation of cerebral venous contrast in susceptibility-weighted imaging of spontaneously breathing pediatric patients sedated with propofol.

Authors:  J Sedlacik; U Löbel; M Kocak; R B Loeffler; J R Reichenbach; A Broniscer; Z Patay; C M Hillenbrand
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Intraoperative Secondary Insults During Orthopedic Surgery in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Nelson N Algarra; Abhijit V Lele; Sumidtra Prathep; Michael J Souter; Monica S Vavilala; Qian Qiu; Deepak Sharma
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.956

10.  Altered local coherence in the default mode network due to sevoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Gopikrishna Deshpande; Chantal Kerssens; Peter Simon Sebel; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.