Literature DB >> 23673297

Probing insect odorant receptors with their cognate ligands: insights into structural features.

Pingxi Xu1, Walter S Leal.   

Abstract

Odorant receptors (ORs) are essential for insect survival in the environment and thus are ideal molecular targets for the design of insect-inspired modern green chemicals to control populations of agricultural pests and insects of medical importance. Although insect ORs are known for more than a decade, their structural biology is still in its infancy. Here, we unravel the first structural features of ORs from the malaria mosquito, the Southern house mosquito and the silkworm moth. The second extracellular loops (ECL-2s) of their predicted structures are much longer than ECL-1s and ECL-3s. The 27 amino-acid-residue-long of the ECL-2s in mosquito and the 43 amino-acid-residue-long ECL2s in moth ORs are well-conserved. About one-third of the residues are identical, including 3-4 Pro residues. Thorough examination of well-conserved residues in these structures, by point mutation and functional assay with the Xenopus oocyte recording system, strongly suggest that these "loops" include three β-turns and some degree of folding. In the Southern house mosquito three Pro residues in ECL-2 are essential for full activation of the receptor, which is finely tuned to the oviposition attractant 3-methylindole. Additionally, the "corner residues" of prolines, including Gly, Tyr, and Leu are functionally important thus suggesting that turns are stabilized not only by backbone hydrogen bonds, but also by side-chain interactions. Examination of ECL-2s from a distant taxonomical group suggests these ECL-2 loops might be functionally important in all insect ORs. Two of the four Pro residues in the predicted ECL-2 of the bombykol receptor in the silkworm moth, BmorOR1, are essential for function. Experimental evidence indicates that these loops may not be specificity determinants, but they may form a cover to the yet-to-be-identified membrane embedded binding cavities of insect ORs.
Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23673297      PMCID: PMC3836372          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  40 in total

1.  The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server.

Authors:  L J McGuffin; K Bryson; D T Jones
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Subunit stoichiometry of a mammalian K+ channel determined by construction of multimeric cDNAs.

Authors:  E R Liman; J Tytgat; P Hess
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Bombykol receptors in the silkworm moth and the fruit fly.

Authors:  Zainulabeuddin Syed; Artyom Kopp; Deborah A Kimbrell; Walter S Leal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pheromone reception in fruit flies expressing a moth's odorant receptor.

Authors:  Zainulabeuddin Syed; Yuko Ishida; Katherine Taylor; Deborah A Kimbrell; Walter S Leal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Expression and membrane topology of Anopheles gambiae odorant receptors in lepidopteran insect cells.

Authors:  Panagiota Tsitoura; Evi Andronopoulou; Daniela Tsikou; Adamantia Agalou; Maria P Papakonstantinou; Georgia A Kotzia; Vassiliki Labropoulou; Luc Swevers; Zafiroula Georgoussi; Kostas Iatrou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Identification of receptors of main sex-pheromone components of three Lepidopteran species.

Authors:  Hidefumi Mitsuno; Takeshi Sakurai; Masatoshi Murai; Tetsuya Yasuda; Soichi Kugimiya; Rika Ozawa; Haruhiko Toyohara; Junji Takabayashi; Hideto Miyoshi; Takaaki Nishioka
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Membrane topology of the Drosophila OR83b odorant receptor.

Authors:  Carolina Lundin; Lukas Käll; Scott A Kreher; Katja Kapp; Erik L Sonnhammer; John R Carlson; Gunnar von Heijne; IngMarie Nilsson
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  Acute olfactory response of Culex mosquitoes to a human- and bird-derived attractant.

Authors:  Zainulabeuddin Syed; Walter S Leal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Candidate pheromone receptors provide the basis for the response of distinct antennal neurons to pheromonal compounds.

Authors:  Ewald Grosse-Wilde; Thomas Gohl; Elisabeth Bouché; Heinz Breer; Jürgen Krieger
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Specificity determinants of the silkworm moth sex pheromone.

Authors:  Pingxi Xu; Antony M Hooper; John A Pickett; Walter S Leal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Mutant cycle analysis identifies a ligand interaction site in an odorant receptor of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Suhaila Rahman; Charles W Luetje
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Functional and Nonfunctional Forms of CquiOR91, an Odorant Selectivity Subunit of Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  David T Hughes; Julien Pelletier; Suhaila Rahman; Sisi Chen; Walter S Leal; Charles W Luetje
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  A determinant of odorant specificity is located at the extracellular loop 2-transmembrane domain 4 interface of an Anopheles gambiae odorant receptor subunit.

Authors:  David T Hughes; Guirong Wang; Laurence J Zwiebel; Charles W Luetje
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  The crystal structure of the AgamOBP1•Icaridin complex reveals alternative binding modes and stereo-selective repellent recognition.

Authors:  Christina E Drakou; Katerina E Tsitsanou; Constantinos Potamitis; Dimitrios Fessas; Maria Zervou; Spyros E Zographos
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Differential expression of olfactory genes in the southern house mosquito and insights into unique odorant receptor gene isoforms.

Authors:  Walter S Leal; Young-Moo Choo; Pingxi Xu; Cherre S B da Silva; Carlos Ueira-Vieira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  High-resolution metabolomics to discover potential parasite-specific biomarkers in a Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic stage culture system.

Authors:  Youngja H Park; Ya Ping Shi; Bill Liang; Carl Angelo D Medriano; Young Ho Jeon; Eucaris Torres; Karan Uppal; Laurence Slutsker; Dean P Jones
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.979

7.  Rapid evolution of chemosensory receptor genes in a pair of sibling species of orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini).

Authors:  Philipp Brand; Santiago R Ramírez; Florian Leese; J Javier G Quezada-Euan; Ralph Tollrian; Thomas Eltz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Cell-free expression, purification, and ligand-binding analysis of Drosophila melanogaster olfactory receptors DmOR67a, DmOR85b and DmORCO.

Authors:  Lotta Tollstoy Tegler; Karolina Corin; Julia Hillger; Brooke Wassie; Yanmei Yu; Shuguang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Sequence-Based Prediction of Olfactory Receptor Responses.

Authors:  Shashank Chepurwar; Abhishek Gupta; Rafi Haddad; Nitin Gupta
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 10.  Molecular and neural mechanisms of sex pheromone reception and processing in the silkmoth Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Takeshi Sakurai; Shigehiro Namiki; Ryohei Kanzaki
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.