Literature DB >> 28334229

Functional and Nonfunctional Forms of CquiOR91, an Odorant Selectivity Subunit of Culex quinquefasciatus.

David T Hughes1,2, Julien Pelletier3,4, Suhaila Rahman1, Sisi Chen1,5, Walter S Leal3, Charles W Luetje1.   

Abstract

In Culex quinquefasciatus, CquiOR91 is the ortholog of 2 larvae-specific odorant receptors (ORs) from Anopheles gambiae (Agam\Or40, previously shown to respond to several odorant ligands including the broad-spectrum repellent N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide, DEET) and Aedes aegypti (Aaeg\Or40). When we cloned full-length CquiOR91 from a Culex quinquefasciatus larval head RNA sample, we found 2 alleles of this OR, differing at 9 residues. Functional analysis using the Xenopus oocyte expression system and 2-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology revealed one allele (CquiOR91.1) to be nonfunctional, whereas the other allele (CquiOR91.2) was functional. Receptors formed by CquiOR91.2 and Cqui\Orco responded to (-)-fenchone, (+)-fenchone, and DEET, similar to what has been reported for Agam\Or40. We also identified 5 novel odorant ligands for the CquiOR91.2 + Cqui\Orco receptor: 2-isobutylthiazole, veratrole, eucalyptol, d-camphor, and safranal, with safranal being the most potent. To explore possible reasons for the lack of function for CquiOR91.1, we generated a series of mutant CquiOR91.2 subunits, in which the residue at each of the 9 polymorphic residue positions was changed from what occurs in CquiOR91.2 to what occurs in CquiOR91.1. Eight of the 9 mutant versions of CquiOR91.2 formed functional receptors, responding to (-)-fenchone. Only the CquiOR91.2 Y183C mutant was nonfunctional. The reverse mutation (C183Y) conferred function on CquiOR91.1 , which became responsive to (-)-fenchone and safranal. These results indicate that the "defect" in CquiOR91.1 that prevents function is the cysteine at position 183.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Xenopus oocytes; electrophysiology; insect; olfaction; polymorphism; receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334229      PMCID: PMC5964367          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjx011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  49 in total

1.  Subunit stoichiometry of a mammalian K+ channel determined by construction of multimeric cDNAs.

Authors:  E R Liman; J Tytgat; P Hess
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Functional conservation of an insect odorant receptor gene across 250 million years of evolution.

Authors:  Walton D Jones; Thuy-Ai T Nguyen; Brian Kloss; Kevin J Lee; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Odorant receptor heterodimerization in the olfactory system of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Eva M Neuhaus; Günter Gisselmann; Weiyi Zhang; Ruth Dooley; Klemens Störtkuhl; Hanns Hatt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-12       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Subunit contributions to insect olfactory receptor function: channel block and odorant recognition.

Authors:  Andrew S Nichols; Sisi Chen; Charles W Luetje
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  A unified nomenclature system for the insect olfactory coreceptor.

Authors:  Leslie B Vosshall; Bill S Hansson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Ir40a neurons are not DEET detectors.

Authors:  Ana F Silbering; Rati Bell; Daniel Münch; Steeve Cruchet; Carolina Gomez-Diaz; Thomas Laudes; C Giovanni Galizia; Richard Benton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  High degree of single nucleotide polymorphisms in California Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) sensu lato.

Authors:  Yoosook Lee; Stephanie N Seifert; Catelyn C Nieman; Rory D McAbee; Parker Goodell; Rebecca Trout Fryxell; Gregory C Lanzaro; Anthony J Cornel
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  The molecular and cellular basis of olfactory-driven behavior in Anopheles gambiae larvae.

Authors:  Yuanfeng Xia; Guirong Wang; Daniela Buscariollo; R Jason Pitts; Heidi Wenger; Laurence J Zwiebel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A highly conserved candidate chemoreceptor expressed in both olfactory and gustatory tissues in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  R Jason Pitts; A Nicole Fox; Laurence J Zwiebel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Heteromeric Anopheline odorant receptors exhibit distinct channel properties.

Authors:  Gregory M Pask; Patrick L Jones; Michael Rützler; David C Rinker; Laurence J Zwiebel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reverse chemical ecology approach for the identification of an oviposition attractant for Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  Young-Moo Choo; Pingxi Xu; Justin K Hwang; Fangfang Zeng; Kaiming Tan; Ganga Bhagavathy; Kamlesh R Chauhan; Walter S Leal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.