Literature DB >> 28972152

Mutant cycle analysis identifies a ligand interaction site in an odorant receptor of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.

Suhaila Rahman1, Charles W Luetje2.   

Abstract

Lack of information about the structure of insect odorant receptors (ORs) hinders the development of more effective repellants to control disease-transmitting insects. Mutagenesis and functional analyses using agonists to map the odorant-binding sites of these receptors have been limited because mutations distant from an agonist-binding site can alter agonist sensitivity. Here we use mutant cycle analysis, an approach for exploring the energetics of protein-protein or protein-ligand interactions, with inhibitors, to identify a component of the odorant-binding site of an OR from the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae The closely related odorant-specificity subunits Agam/Or15 and Agam/Or13 were each co-expressed with Agam/Orco (odorant receptor co-receptor subunit) in Xenopus oocytes and assayed by two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology. We identified (-)-fenchone as a competitive inhibitor with different potencies at the two receptors and used this difference to screen a panel of 37 Agam/Or15 mutants, surveying all positions that differ between Agam/Or15 and Agam/Or13 in the transmembrane and extracellular regions, identifying position 195 as a determinant of (-)-fenchone sensitivity. Inhibition by (-)-fenchone and six structurally related inhibitors of Agam/Or15 receptors containing each of four different hydrophobic residues at position 195 served as input data for mutant cycle analysis. Several mutant cycles, calculated from the inhibition of two receptors by each of two ligands, yielded coupling energies of ≥1 kcal/mol, indicating a close, physical interaction between the ligand and residue 195 of Agam/Or15. This approach should be useful in further expanding our knowledge of odorant-binding site structures in ORs of disease vector insects.
© 2017 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Xenopus; electrophysiology; insect; olfaction; oocyte; receptor; structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28972152      PMCID: PMC5704475          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M117.810374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  47 in total

1.  Functional conservation of an insect odorant receptor gene across 250 million years of evolution.

Authors:  Walton D Jones; Thuy-Ai T Nguyen; Brian Kloss; Kevin J Lee; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Odorant receptor heterodimerization in the olfactory system of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Eva M Neuhaus; Günter Gisselmann; Weiyi Zhang; Ruth Dooley; Klemens Störtkuhl; Hanns Hatt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-12       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Strategy for analysing the co-operativity of intramolecular interactions in peptides and proteins.

Authors:  A Horovitz; A R Fersht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-08-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  dOr83b--receptor or ion channel?

Authors:  Dieter Wicher; Ronny Schäfer; René Bauernfeind; Marcus C Stensmyr; Regine Heller; Stefan H Heinemann; Bill S Hansson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Subunit contributions to insect olfactory receptor function: channel block and odorant recognition.

Authors:  Andrew S Nichols; Sisi Chen; Charles W Luetje
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  A unified nomenclature system for the insect olfactory coreceptor.

Authors:  Leslie B Vosshall; Bill S Hansson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Mapping spatial relationships between residues in the ligand-binding domain of the 5-HT3 receptor using a molecular ruler.

Authors:  Heather L Nyce; Spencer T Stober; Cameron F Abrams; Michael M White
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Energetics of protein-protein interactions: analysis of the barnase-barstar interface by single mutations and double mutant cycles.

Authors:  G Schreiber; A R Fersht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-04-28       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Spatial localization of the K+ channel selectivity filter by mutant cycle-based structure analysis.

Authors:  R Ranganathan; J H Lewis; R MacKinnon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  A highly conserved candidate chemoreceptor expressed in both olfactory and gustatory tissues in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  R Jason Pitts; A Nicole Fox; Laurence J Zwiebel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Annotation and Analysis of 3902 Odorant Receptor Protein Sequences from 21 Insect Species Provide Insights into the Evolution of Odorant Receptor Gene Families in Solitary and Social Insects.

Authors:  Pablo Mier; Jean-Fred Fontaine; Marah Stoldt; Romain Libbrecht; Carlotta Martelli; Susanne Foitzik; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.141

Review 2.  Odorant Receptors and Odorant-Binding Proteins as Insect Pest Control Targets: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Herbert Venthur; Jing-Jiang Zhou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Protocol to identify ligands of odorant receptors using two-electrode voltage clamp combined with the Xenopus oocytes heterologous expression system.

Authors:  Song Cao; Yang Liu; Guirong Wang
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2022-03-15

4.  Pheromone Binding Protein EhipPBP1 Is Highly Enriched in the Male Antennae of the Seabuckthorn Carpenterworm and Is Binding to Sex Pheromone Components.

Authors:  Ping Hu; Chenglong Gao; Shixiang Zong; Youqing Luo; Jing Tao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  The whole body transcriptome of Coleophora obducta reveals important olfactory proteins.

Authors:  Dongbai Wang; Jing Tao; Pengfei Lu; Youqing Luo; Ping Hu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.