Deborah S Keller1, Bradley J Champagne, Sharon L Stein, Bridget O Ermlich, Conor P Delaney. 1. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Institute for Surgery and Innovation, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, 7 Lakeside, Cleveland, OH, 44106-5047, USA, Deborah.Keller@uhhospitals.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of AlloMEM™, a novel lyophililzed human peritoneal membrane, at peritoneal reconstitution, and decreasing adhesion formation after temporary loop ileostomy. METHODS: In a pilot study, ten patients had AlloMEM™ used during elective formation of a temporary diverting loop ileostomy for benign or malignant colorectal disease. A blinded investigator and the operating surgeon analyzed the change in adhesion formation and peritoneal remodelling using ileostomy mobilization time and a 5-point adhesion scale grading intra-abdominally and at the subcutaneous and fascial levels. RESULTS: The mean body mass index was 31 [standard deviation (SD) 5.6], and 40 % of patients had previous abdominal surgery. Ileostomies were reversed after a mean 14 weeks (SD 6.0). The mean ileostomy mobilization time was 27.2 min (SD 12.0). From baseline to ileostomy reversal, there were significant increases in adhesions at the subcutaneous (p = 0.0002) and fascial levels (p = 0.0024). The increased subcutaneous adhesions were associated with improved peritoneal remodeling. There was no significant increase in adhesions from baseline to ileostomy reversal at the intra-abdominal points (p = 0.9393) or around the ileostomy site (p = 0.6128). The median hospital length of stay was 2.6 days (range, 2-3). A single adverse event related to product packaging led to redesign of the packaging process. CONCLUSIONS: Use of AlloMEM™ in ileostomy closures suggested improvement in adhesions around the fascia and promotion of peritoneal remodeling. AlloMEM™ was safe, feasible, and easy to use in this pilot study. Comparative research is needed to assess the outcomes with this novel product.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of AlloMEM™, a novel lyophililzed human peritoneal membrane, at peritoneal reconstitution, and decreasing adhesion formation after temporary loop ileostomy. METHODS: In a pilot study, ten patients had AlloMEM™ used during elective formation of a temporary diverting loop ileostomy for benign or malignant colorectal disease. A blinded investigator and the operating surgeon analyzed the change in adhesion formation and peritoneal remodelling using ileostomy mobilization time and a 5-point adhesion scale grading intra-abdominally and at the subcutaneous and fascial levels. RESULTS: The mean body mass index was 31 [standard deviation (SD) 5.6], and 40 % of patients had previous abdominal surgery. Ileostomies were reversed after a mean 14 weeks (SD 6.0). The mean ileostomy mobilization time was 27.2 min (SD 12.0). From baseline to ileostomy reversal, there were significant increases in adhesions at the subcutaneous (p = 0.0002) and fascial levels (p = 0.0024). The increased subcutaneous adhesions were associated with improved peritoneal remodeling. There was no significant increase in adhesions from baseline to ileostomy reversal at the intra-abdominal points (p = 0.9393) or around the ileostomy site (p = 0.6128). The median hospital length of stay was 2.6 days (range, 2-3). A single adverse event related to product packaging led to redesign of the packaging process. CONCLUSIONS: Use of AlloMEM™ in ileostomy closures suggested improvement in adhesions around the fascia and promotion of peritoneal remodeling. AlloMEM™ was safe, feasible, and easy to use in this pilot study. Comparative research is needed to assess the outcomes with this novel product.
Authors: Victor W Fazio; Zane Cohen; James W Fleshman; Harry van Goor; Joel J Bauer; Bruce G Wolff; Marvin Corman; Robert W Beart; Steven D Wexner; James M Becker; John R T Monson; Howard S Kaufman; David E Beck; H Randolph Bailey; Kirk A Ludwig; Michael J Stamos; Ara Darzi; Ronald Bleday; Richard Dorazio; Robert D Madoff; Lee E Smith; Susan Gearhart; Keith Lillemoe; Jonas Göhl Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Judy Jin; Gabriela Voskerician; Shawn A Hunter; Michael F McGee; Leandro T Cavazzola; Steve Schomisch; Karem Harth; Michael J Rosen Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2009-05-13 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Gabriela Voskerician; Judy Jin; Shawn A Hunter; Christina P Williams; Michael White; Michael J Rosen Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2009-05-03 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Eu-Tteum Choi; Seok-Byung Lim; Jong Lyul Lee; Chan Wook Kim; Young Il Kim; Yong Sik Yoon; In Ja Park; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 1.859