Literature DB >> 19628227

Human peritoneal membrane controls adhesion formation and host tissue response following intra-abdominal placement in a porcine model.

Judy Jin1, Gabriela Voskerician, Shawn A Hunter, Michael F McGee, Leandro T Cavazzola, Steve Schomisch, Karem Harth, Michael J Rosen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Even with the advent of bioresorbable barriers, complications due to visceral adhesions following surgery continue to occur. The use of a homologous adhesive barrier such as human peritoneal membrane (HPM) could prevent adhesions formation and enhance wound healing. This study evaluates HPM as an effective adhesive barrier in a porcine model simulating a ventral hernia procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through a midline laparotomy, meshes (10 cmx10 cm) were sewn onto the intact peritoneum of a pig, on each side of a midline incision in superior and inferior positions (4 randomized meshes/pig, n=9 pigs). The pigs were survived for 90 d. The meshes used were: HPM, compressed polytetrafluoro-ethylene (cPTFE), cPTFE+HPM, and polyester-collagen composite (PX). Exploratory laparoscopy was performed at 30 and 90 d to evaluate the extent of visceral adhesions. At necropsy, the extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions as well as material-abdominal wall integration were evaluated. Finally, host tissue response was assessed through scoring of inflammation, foreign body reaction, and mesothelialization.
RESULTS: HPM and PX led to the least extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions compared to cPTFE and cPTFE+HPM, but integrated less strongly within the adjacent abdominal wall. PX displayed the most robust foreign body reaction among all prosthetic materials, while HPM scored similarly to the native peritoneum. The extent of mesothelialization was similar throughout the materials tested.
CONCLUSIONS: The HPM barrier which promotes long-term peritoneal remodeling could diminish postsurgical intraperitoneal adhesions following hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19628227     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.

Authors:  Christoph Brochhausen; Volker H Schmitt; Constanze N E Planck; Taufiek K Rajab; David Hollemann; Christine Tapprich; Bernhard Krämer; Christian Wallwiener; Helmut Hierlemann; Rolf Zehbe; Heinrich Planck; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Comparison of Permacol™ and Strattice™ for the repair of abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  K E Mulier; A H Nguyen; J P Delaney; S Marquez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Human vital amniotic membrane reduces adhesions in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair.

Authors:  A H Petter-Puchner; R H Fortelny; K Mika; S Hennerbichler; H Redl; C Gabriel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Pilot study evaluating the efficacy of AlloMEM™ for prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions and peritoneal regeneration after loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Bradley J Champagne; Sharon L Stein; Bridget O Ermlich; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The use of Vicryl mesh in a porcine model to assess its safety as an adjunct to posterior fascial closure during retromuscular mesh placement.

Authors:  L Liu; C Petro; A Majumder; M Fayezizadeh; J Anderson; Y W Novitsky
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.739

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.