Literature DB >> 9449594

Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994.

N F Ray1, W G Denton, M Thamer, S C Henderson, S Perry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation represents a major complication after lower abdominal operations. It is postulated that a shift in surgical practice in recent years toward the use of less invasive techniques, such as laparoscopy, may be associated with a reduction in the incidence of intraperitoneal adhesions and in the rate of adhesiolysis procedures. Using an attributable-risk methodology, this cost-of-illness study was designed to estimate the hospitalization rate and expenditures for adhesiolysis in the United States in 1994 and to examine changes in attributable expenditures since 1988. STUDY
DESIGN: A national hospital discharge data base was used to identify all abdominal adhesion procedures performed in the United States in 1994. Total hospitalization expenditures were based on Medicare payment rates for adhesiolysis hospitalizations and physician services, which were applied to the total number of inpatient days attributed to adhesiolysis. The results were compared with published rates and expenditures attributed to adhesiolysis in 1988.
RESULTS: Adhesiolysis was responsible for 303,836 hospitalizations during 1994, primarily for procedures on the digestive and female reproductive systems. These procedures accounted for 846,415 days of inpatient care and $1.3 billion in hospitalization and surgeon expenditures.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the adhesiolysis hospitalization rate has remained constant since 1988, inpatient expenditures have decreased by nearly 10% because of a 15% decrease in the average length of stay. The increased use of laparoscopy during this 6-year period does not appear to be associated with a concomitant reduction in the adhesiolysis hospitalization rate, suggesting that the causes of adhesion formation warrant further research.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9449594     DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(97)00127-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  115 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of the development of experimentally induced post surgical adhesions: a microstereological study.

Authors:  S A Ricketts; P D Sibbons; C J Green
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Fewer intraperitoneal adhesions with use of hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose membrane: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Wietske W Vrijland; Larissa N L Tseng; Heert J M Eijkman; Wim C J Hop; Jack J Jakimowicz; Piet Leguit; Laurents P S Stassen; Dingeman J Swank; Robert Haverlag; H Jaap Bonjer; Hans Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Hyaluronic acid/mildly crosslinked alginate hydrogel as an injectable tissue adhesion barrier.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Na; Se Heang Oh; Kyu Sang Song; Jin Ho Lee
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Value of gastrografin in adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Anna Weiss; Divya Sood; Scott E Greenway; Marco Tomassi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Adhesive small bowel obstruction: how long can patients tolerate conservative treatment?

Authors:  Shou-Chuan Shih; Kuo-Shyang Jeng; Shee-Chan Lin; Chin-Roa Kao; Sun-Yen Chou; Horng-Yuan Wang; Wen-Hsiung Chang; Cheng-Hsin Chu; Tsang-En Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Abdominal adhesions: intestinal obstruction, pain, and infertility.

Authors:  W W Vrijland; J Jeekel; H J van Geldorp; D J Swank; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Intra-abdominal adhesion prevention: are we getting any closer?

Authors:  James M Becker; Arthur F Stucchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Justification of extraperitoneal laparoscopic access for surgery of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  András Hoznek; Laurent Salomon; Matthew Gettman; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Prevention of peritoneal adhesions: a promising role for gene therapy.

Authors:  Hussein M Atta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Peritoneal adhesions after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Valerio Mais
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.