Literature DB >> 20218277

Closure of loop ileostomies: is early discharge safe and achievable?

U Ihedioha1, S Muhtaseb, K Kalmar, L Donnelly, V Muir, A Macdonald.   

Abstract

A prospective audit of the complications associated with reversal of a loop ileostomy was carried out between March 2000 and March 2005. The complication rate, length of inpatient hospitalisation and re-admission rate were assessed in 100 patients, in a single clinical practice. The median (interquartile range) length of time between the primary procedure and closure was 133 days (120-270) days. Median length of inpatient stay was two days (one - three) days. The overall complication rate was 18%. One patient had a post-operative leak leading to local abscess formation. This was drained surgically after initial failure with radiological drainage. A second patient had a late leak, three weeks after closure, leading to fistula formation. This patient required surgical resection of the anastomosis after failure of conservative management. Twelve patients were re-admitted with small bowel obstruction (12%), of whom 11 were managed conservatively, while one underwent further surgery. There was one post- operative death as a result of acute cardiac failure secondary to undiagnosed hypertensive cardiomyopathy. Thus early discharge following closure of a loop ileostomy, can be achieved with an acceptably low serious complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20218277     DOI: 10.1258/RSMSMJ.55.1.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scott Med J        ISSN: 0036-9330            Impact factor:   0.729


  5 in total

1.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Diagnosis and definition of anastomotic leakage from the surgeon's perspective].

Authors:  T Welsch; M von Frankenberg; J Schmidt; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Short-stay compared to long-stay admissions for loop ileostomy reversals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victoria Archer; Zacharie Cloutier; Annie Berg; Tyler McKechnie; Wojtek Wiercioch; Cagla Eskicioglu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Identifying causes for high readmission rates after stoma reversal.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Zhamak Khorgami; Brian Swendseid; Sadaf Khan; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Pilot study evaluating the efficacy of AlloMEM™ for prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions and peritoneal regeneration after loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Bradley J Champagne; Sharon L Stein; Bridget O Ermlich; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.