Literature DB >> 10364652

Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useless for the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

C Hofer1, C Laubenbacher, T Block, J Breul, R Hartung, M Schwaiger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: After radical retropubic prostatectomy a rise of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) indicates a local recurrent or metastatic disease. If the bone scan shows no apparent bone metastasis, morphological imaging methods like x-ray computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or transrectal ultrasound often cannot distinguish between postoperative scar and local recurrence. Therefore we investigated the feasibility of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18 FDG PET) for metabolic characterization of prostatic cancer, especially for differentiation of scar or recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: Dynamic PET with 370 MBq F-18 deoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) up to 60 min p.i. was performed in 2 patients with biopsy-proven benign prostatic hyperplasia, in 11 patients with a histologically proven prostate cancer prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and 7 patients with suspected local recurrence (with negative bone scan) after RRP prior to biopsy of anastomosis (3 local recurrence, 4 postoperative scar).
RESULTS: Prostate cancer showed a very low F-18 FDG uptake. The placement of regions of interest was only possible by the use of other imaging methods. There was not difference between the F-18 FDG uptake of benign prostate hyperplasia, prostate carcinoma, postoperative scar or local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
CONCLUSION: F-18 FDG seems not to be useful to distinguish between postoperative scar and local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10364652     DOI: 10.1159/000019923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  75 in total

1.  Is 11C-choline the most appropriate tracer for prostate cancer? For.

Authors:  Ferruccio Fazio; Maria Picchio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  FDG PET in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2009-04-01

Review 3.  GCPII imaging and cancer.

Authors:  C A Foss; R C Mease; S Y Cho; H J Kim; M G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  [PSA recurrence after primary curative therapy--local or systemic? When is a second curative therapy still possible?].

Authors:  M P Wirth; F M Engelhardt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Multicentre study of 18F-FDG-PET/CT prostate incidental uptake.

Authors:  Francesco Bertagna; Arnoldo Piccardo; Bassam Dib; Mattia Bertoli; Federica Fracassi; Giovanni Bosio; Raffaele Giubbini; Giorgio Biasiotto; Luca Giovanella; Giorgio Treglia
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  PET of Glucose Metabolism and Cellular Proliferation in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  New horizons in prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  Gregory Ravizzini; Baris Turkbey; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Antilipolytic drug boosts glucose metabolism in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kim Francis Andersen; Vadim Divilov; Jacek Koziorowski; NagaVaraKishore Pillarsetty; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 9.  Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Carina Mari Aparici; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.446

10.  Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  A H Hou; D Swanson; A B Barqawi
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2010-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.