Literature DB >> 23669308

Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review.

Ravi N Sharaf1, Parvathi Myer, Christopher D Stave, Lisa C Diamond, Uri Ladabaum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening of persons with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome can yield substantial benefits at acceptable costs, presuming sufficient uptake of genetic testing by first-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the frequency of and factors associated with genetic testing of first-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands.
METHODS: We searched 4 databases (CINAHL, PsycInfo, PUBMED, and SCOPUS) for articles published through May 2011 reporting uptake of genetic testing by relatives of Lynch syndrome probands. Two investigators independently screened articles to determine whether they met inclusion criteria; data were collected on study population, genetic counseling, and genetic testing. A narrative, qualitative systematic review was performed.
RESULTS: We identified 1258 potentially relevant articles; 533 underwent full-text review, and 8 were included in the final analysis. Of first-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands, 52% or less received genetic testing. For each proband, 3.6 or fewer relatives underwent genetic testing. Demographic factors (age <50 years, female sex, parenthood, level of education, employment, participation in medical studies), psychological factors (lack of depressive symptoms), and possibly family history (greater number of relatives with cancer) were associated with uptake of genetic testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing appears to be underutilized by first-degree relatives of patients with Lynch syndrome. The clinical benefit and economic feasibility of screening persons with colorectal cancer for Lynch syndrome depend on optimizing family-wide uptake of genetic testing. Future research and clinical efforts should focus on ways to overcome barriers to genetic testing.
Copyright © 2013 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CI; CRC; Colorectal Cancer; FDR; First-degree Relatives; GINA; Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; Genetic Testing; LS; Lynch Syndrome; Lynch syndrome; NOS; Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; OR; Second-degree Relative; colorectal cancer; confidence interval; first-degree relative; odds ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23669308     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  60 in total

Review 1.  Genetic testing for hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes: Interpreting results in today's practice.

Authors:  Jacquelyn M Powers; Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh; Bryson W Katona
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12

2.  Colorectal cancer: Cascade genetic testing in Lynch syndrome: room for improvement.

Authors:  Kory Jasperson
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Worldwide Practice Patterns in Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis and Management, Based on Data From the International Mismatch Repair Consortium.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Pan; Robert W Haile; Allyson Templeton; Finlay Macrae; FeiFei Qin; Vandana Sundaram; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Psychosocial, attitudinal, and demographic correlates of cancer-related germline genetic testing in the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Megan C Roberts; Erin Turbitt; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-02-20

Review 5.  Disparities in gynecologic cancer genetics evaluation.

Authors:  Emily M Hinchcliff; Erica M Bednar; Karen H Lu; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Developing a framework for implementation of genetic services: learning from examples of testing for monogenic forms of common diseases.

Authors:  Tessel Rigter; Lidewij Henneman; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Maggie Shepherd; Ignacio Blanco; Ulf Kristoffersson; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-06-04

7.  Evaluating the utilization of educational materials in communicating about Lynch syndrome to at-risk relatives.

Authors:  Kristen Dilzell; Kerry Kingham; Kelly Ormond; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation to increase adherence with screening colonoscopy among minority individuals.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Lina Jandorf; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2020 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Naohiro Tomita; Hideyuki Ishida; Kohji Tanakaya; Tatsuro Yamaguchi; Kensuke Kumamoto; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takao Hinoi; Yasuyuki Miyakura; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Tetsuji Takayama; Hideki Ishikawa; Takeshi Nakajima; Akiko Chino; Hideki Shimodaira; Akira Hirasawa; Yoshiko Nakayama; Shigeki Sekine; Kazuo Tamura; Kiwamu Akagi; Yuko Kawasaki; Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Masami Arai; Michio Itabashi; Yojiro Hashiguchi; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Traditional roles in a non-traditional setting: genetic counseling in precision oncology.

Authors:  Jessica N Everett; Shanna L Gustafson; Victoria M Raymond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.