Literature DB >> 30835082

Psychosocial, attitudinal, and demographic correlates of cancer-related germline genetic testing in the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Megan C Roberts1, Erin Turbitt2, William M P Klein3,2.   

Abstract

The study objective was to examine bivariate and multivariate associations among worry, perceptions, attitudes, sociodemographics, and uptake of cancer-related germline genetic testing. We used data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (cycle 5.1), administered (January-May 2017) to a nationally representative sample of non-institutionalized adults (n = 3285). Those who had "heard about genetic tests that determine how a disease can be treated" had a higher likelihood of Lynch syndrome and BRCA1/2 testing (aRR = 2.57, p < 0.01; aRR = 3.23, p < 0.04). Attitudinal and psychosocial variables were not associated with uptake. Future research should explore ways to educate the public about the potential use of genetics in treatment decision-making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1/2; Cancer; Genetic testing; Health beliefs; Lynch syndrome; Psychosocial factors; Uptake

Year:  2019        PMID: 30835082      PMCID: PMC6754484          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-00405-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  25 in total

1.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2017.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Robert Pilarski; Michael Berry; Saundra S Buys; Meagan Farmer; Susan Friedman; Judy E Garber; Noah D Kauff; Seema Khan; Catherine Klein; Wendy Kohlmann; Allison Kurian; Jennifer K Litton; Lisa Madlensky; Sofia D Merajver; Kenneth Offit; Tuya Pal; Gwen Reiser; Kristen Mahoney Shannon; Elizabeth Swisher; Shaveta Vinayak; Nicoleta C Voian; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Myra J Wick; Georgia L Wiesner; Mary Dwyer; Susan Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  National Estimates of Genetic Testing in Women With a History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Childers; Kimberly K Childers; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; James Macinko
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 3.2017.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Dawn Provenzale; Scott E Regenbogen; Heather Hampel; Thomas P Slavin; Michael J Hall; Xavier Llor; Daniel C Chung; Dennis J Ahnen; Travis Bray; Gregory Cooper; Dayna S Early; James M Ford; Francis M Giardiello; William Grady; Amy L Halverson; Stanley R Hamilton; Jason B Klapman; David W Larson; Audrey J Lazenby; Patrick M Lynch; Arnold J Markowitz; Robert J Mayer; Reid M Ness; Niloy Jewel Samadder; Moshe Shike; Shajanpeter Sugandha; Jennifer M Weiss; Mary A Dwyer; Ndiya Ogba
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Knowledge, attitudes, and utilization of BRCA1/2 testing among women with early-onset breast cancer.

Authors:  Nikki Peters; Susan M Domchek; Susan M Domcheck; Abigail Rose; Rachael Polis; Jill Stopfer; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2005

5.  Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge.

Authors:  K A Kaphingst; F M Facio; M-R Cheng; S Brooks; H Eidem; A Linn; B B Biesecker; L G Biesecker
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ravi N Sharaf; Parvathi Myer; Christopher D Stave; Lisa C Diamond; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genetic testing strategies in newly diagnosed individuals with colorectal cancer aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome in relatives.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  What is the clinical utility of genetic testing?

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Place of birth, cancer beliefs and being current with colon cancer screening among US adults.

Authors:  Kolapo A Idowu; Babafemi Adenuga; Oritsetsemaye Otubu; Krishnan Narasimhan; Feremusu Kamara; Finie Hunter-Richardson; Daniel Larbi; Zaki A Sherif; Adeyinka O Laiyemo
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-25
View more
  3 in total

1.  Genetic counseling, genetic testing, and risk perceptions for breast and colorectal cancer: Results from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Erin Turbitt; Megan C Roberts; Jennifer M Taber; Erika A Waters; Timothy S McNeel; Barbara B Biesecker; William M P Klein
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Are beliefs about the importance of genetics for cancer prevention and early detection associated with high risk cancer genetic testing in the U.S. Population?

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Kristin G Maki; Robert Yu; Susan K Peterson; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-03-29

3.  Public Interest in Population Genetic Screening for Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Megan C Roberts; Kimberly S Foss; Gail E Henderson; Sabrina N Powell; Katherine W Saylor; Karen E Weck; Laura V Milko
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.772

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.