Literature DB >> 31761969

Genetic testing for hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes: Interpreting results in today's practice.

Jacquelyn M Powers1, Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh1, Bryson W Katona2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in genomics have led to the discovery of multiple predisposition genes linked to increased risk for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. The goal of this review is to assist physicians and allied health care professionals in understanding the current paradigm shift in clinical genetic testing for hereditary GI cancer predisposition syndromes; with a focus on multigene panel testing (MGPT) and test results interpretation. Additionally, this review introduces direct-to-consumer and at-home genetic testing. Both delivery models are increasing in popularity and clinicians will be expected to address results from patients who utilize these approaches. RECENT
FINDINGS: Technological advancement and reduced costs have transformed the genetic testing approach from single syndrome genetic testing to broad-based MGPT. MGPT has the benefit of aiding in efficient genetic diagnosis; however, clinicians should be knowledgeable of possible results including variants of uncertain significance, secondary findings, and pathogenic variants within high- and low-to-moderate risk genes, as well as genes for which risks are ill-defined. The landscape of clinical cancer genetics continues to evolve rapidly. Timely updates are critical to ensure the medical community is familiar with current considerations and ongoing challenges regarding genetic testing for hereditary GI cancer susceptibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multigene panel testing; cancer genetics; direct-to-consumer; gastrointestinal cancer susceptibility; genetics; variant interpretation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31761969      PMCID: PMC6926154          DOI: 10.1007/s11938-019-00253-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  29 in total

1.  Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort.

Authors:  Charité Ricker; Julie O Culver; Katrina Lowstuter; Duveen Sturgeon; Julia D Sturgeon; Christopher R Chanock; William J Gauderman; Kevin J McDonnell; Gregory E Idos; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2016-01-12

2.  How and When to Consider Genetic Testing for Colon Cancer?

Authors:  Veroushka Ballester; Marcia Cruz-Correa
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net?

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Angela Bradbury; Judy E Garber; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prevalence of Variant Reclassification Following Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Jacqueline Mersch; Nichole Brown; Sara Pirzadeh-Miller; Erin Mundt; Hannah C Cox; Krystal Brown; Melissa Aston; Lisa Esterling; Susan Manley; Theodora Ross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.

Authors:  Laura M Amendola; Gail P Jarvik; Michael C Leo; Heather M McLaughlin; Yassmine Akkari; Michelle D Amaral; Jonathan S Berg; Sawona Biswas; Kevin M Bowling; Laura K Conlin; Greg M Cooper; Michael O Dorschner; Matthew C Dulik; Arezou A Ghazani; Rajarshi Ghosh; Robert C Green; Ragan Hart; Carrie Horton; Jennifer J Johnston; Matthew S Lebo; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Jeffrey Ou; Christine M Pak; Ronak Y Patel; Sumit Punj; Carolyn Sue Richards; Joseph Salama; Natasha T Strande; Yaping Yang; Sharon E Plon; Leslie G Biesecker; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ravi N Sharaf; Parvathi Myer; Christopher D Stave; Lisa C Diamond; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  The role of endoscopy in the management of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome.

Authors:  Shria Kumar; Jessica M Long; Gregory G Ginsberg; Bryson W Katona
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Genetic variants associated with colorectal cancer risk: comprehensive research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Xiangyu Ma; Ben Zhang; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Conflicting Interpretation of Genetic Variants and Cancer Risk by Commercial Laboratories as Assessed by the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing.

Authors:  Judith Balmaña; Laura Digiovanni; Pragna Gaddam; Michael F Walsh; Vijai Joseph; Zsofia K Stadler; Katherine L Nathanson; Judy E Garber; Fergus J Couch; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.