Jacquelyn M Powers1, Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh1, Bryson W Katona2. 1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. bryson.katona@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in genomics have led to the discovery of multiple predisposition genes linked to increased risk for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. The goal of this review is to assist physicians and allied health care professionals in understanding the current paradigm shift in clinical genetic testing for hereditary GI cancer predisposition syndromes; with a focus on multigene panel testing (MGPT) and test results interpretation. Additionally, this review introduces direct-to-consumer and at-home genetic testing. Both delivery models are increasing in popularity and clinicians will be expected to address results from patients who utilize these approaches. RECENT FINDINGS: Technological advancement and reduced costs have transformed the genetic testing approach from single syndrome genetic testing to broad-based MGPT. MGPT has the benefit of aiding in efficient genetic diagnosis; however, clinicians should be knowledgeable of possible results including variants of uncertain significance, secondary findings, and pathogenic variants within high- and low-to-moderate risk genes, as well as genes for which risks are ill-defined. The landscape of clinical cancer genetics continues to evolve rapidly. Timely updates are critical to ensure the medical community is familiar with current considerations and ongoing challenges regarding genetic testing for hereditary GI cancer susceptibility.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in genomics have led to the discovery of multiple predisposition genes linked to increased risk for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. The goal of this review is to assist physicians and allied health care professionals in understanding the current paradigm shift in clinical genetic testing for hereditary GI cancer predisposition syndromes; with a focus on multigene panel testing (MGPT) and test results interpretation. Additionally, this review introduces direct-to-consumer and at-home genetic testing. Both delivery models are increasing in popularity and clinicians will be expected to address results from patients who utilize these approaches. RECENT FINDINGS: Technological advancement and reduced costs have transformed the genetic testing approach from single syndrome genetic testing to broad-based MGPT. MGPT has the benefit of aiding in efficient genetic diagnosis; however, clinicians should be knowledgeable of possible results including variants of uncertain significance, secondary findings, and pathogenic variants within high- and low-to-moderate risk genes, as well as genes for which risks are ill-defined. The landscape of clinical cancer genetics continues to evolve rapidly. Timely updates are critical to ensure the medical community is familiar with current considerations and ongoing challenges regarding genetic testing for hereditary GI cancer susceptibility.
Entities:
Keywords:
Multigene panel testing; cancer genetics; direct-to-consumer; gastrointestinal cancer susceptibility; genetics; variant interpretation
Authors: Charité Ricker; Julie O Culver; Katrina Lowstuter; Duveen Sturgeon; Julia D Sturgeon; Christopher R Chanock; William J Gauderman; Kevin J McDonnell; Gregory E Idos; Stephen B Gruber Journal: Cancer Genet Date: 2016-01-12
Authors: Laura M Amendola; Gail P Jarvik; Michael C Leo; Heather M McLaughlin; Yassmine Akkari; Michelle D Amaral; Jonathan S Berg; Sawona Biswas; Kevin M Bowling; Laura K Conlin; Greg M Cooper; Michael O Dorschner; Matthew C Dulik; Arezou A Ghazani; Rajarshi Ghosh; Robert C Green; Ragan Hart; Carrie Horton; Jennifer J Johnston; Matthew S Lebo; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Jeffrey Ou; Christine M Pak; Ronak Y Patel; Sumit Punj; Carolyn Sue Richards; Joseph Salama; Natasha T Strande; Yaping Yang; Sharon E Plon; Leslie G Biesecker; Heidi L Rehm Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Ravi N Sharaf; Parvathi Myer; Christopher D Stave; Lisa C Diamond; Uri Ladabaum Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm Journal: Genet Med Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Judith Balmaña; Laura Digiovanni; Pragna Gaddam; Michael F Walsh; Vijai Joseph; Zsofia K Stadler; Katherine L Nathanson; Judy E Garber; Fergus J Couch; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson; Susan M Domchek Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 44.544