Literature DB >> 23665005

Strand-seq: a unifying tool for studies of chromosome segregation.

Ester Falconer1, Peter M Lansdorp.   

Abstract

Non random segregation of sister chromatids has been implicated to help specify daughter cell fate (the Silent Sister Hypothesis [1]) or to protect the genome of long-lived stem cells (the Immortal Strand Hypothesis [2]). The idea that sister chromatids are non-randomly segregated into specific daughter cells is only marginally supported by data in sporadic and often contradictory studies. As a result, the field has moved forward rather slowly. The advent of being able to directly label and differentiate sister chromatids in vivo using fluorescence in situ hybridization [3] was a significant advance for such studies. However, this approach is limited by the need for large tracks of unidirectional repeats on chromosomes and the reliance on quantitative imaging of fluorescent probes and rigorous statistical analysis to discern between the two competing hypotheses. A novel method called Strand-seq which uses next-generation sequencing to assay sister chromatid inheritance patterns independently for each chromosome [4] offers a comprehensive approach to test for non-random segregation. In addition Strand-seq enables studies on the deposition of chromatin marks in relation to DNA replication. This method is expected to help unify the field by testing previous claims of non-random segregation in an unbiased way in many model systems in vitro and in vivo. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymmetric; Crick; Non-random; Strand-seq; Template; Watson

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23665005      PMCID: PMC3791154          DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol        ISSN: 1084-9521            Impact factor:   7.727


  45 in total

1.  Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer.

Authors:  J Cairns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Mitotic checkpoints and the maintenance of the chromosome karyotype.

Authors:  Ilse Decordier; Enrico Cundari; Micheline Kirsch-Volders
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Stem cell identity and template DNA strand segregation.

Authors:  Shahragim Tajbakhsh
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 8.382

4.  The inheritance of acquired epigenetic variations.

Authors:  E Jablonka; M J Lamb
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1989-07-10       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 5.  Chaperoning histones during DNA replication and repair.

Authors:  Monica Ransom; Briana K Dennehey; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Identification of sister chromatids by DNA template strand sequences.

Authors:  Ester Falconer; Elizabeth A Chavez; Alexander Henderson; Steven S S Poon; Steven McKinney; Lindsay Brown; David G Huntsman; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids?

Authors:  Peter M Lansdorp; Ester Falconer; Jiang Tao; Julie Brind'Amour; Ulrike Naumann
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5.

Authors:  Nick Barker; Johan H van Es; Jeroen Kuipers; Pekka Kujala; Maaike van den Born; Miranda Cozijnsen; Andrea Haegebarth; Jeroen Korving; Harry Begthel; Peter J Peters; Hans Clevers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands.

Authors:  Christopher S Potten; Gary Owen; Dawn Booth
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Intestinal epithelial stem cells do not protect their genome by asymmetric chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Marion Escobar; Pierre Nicolas; Fatiha Sangar; Sabine Laurent-Chabalier; Philippe Clair; Dominique Joubert; Philippe Jay; Catherine Legraverend
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  10 in total

1.  Thousands of human mutation clusters are explained by short-range template switching.

Authors:  Ari Löytynoja
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 9.438

2.  Investigating CTCs in NSCLC-a reaction to the study of Jia-Wei Wan: a preliminary study on the relationship between circulating tumor cells count and clinical features in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Menno Tamminga; Hendricus Harry Johannes Marie Groen; Thijo Jeroen Nicolaas Hiltermann
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Structural variant identification and characterization.

Authors:  Parithi Balachandran; Christine R Beck
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Nanopore sequencing and the Shasta toolkit enable efficient de novo assembly of eleven human genomes.

Authors:  Kishwar Shafin; Trevor Pesout; Ryan Lorig-Roach; Marina Haukness; Hugh E Olsen; Colleen Bosworth; Joel Armstrong; Kristof Tigyi; Nicholas Maurer; Sergey Koren; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Tobias Marschall; Simon Mayes; Vania Costa; Justin M Zook; Kelvin J Liu; Duncan Kilburn; Melanie Sorensen; Katy M Munson; Mitchell R Vollger; Jean Monlong; Erik Garrison; Evan E Eichler; Sofie Salama; David Haussler; Richard E Green; Mark Akeson; Adam Phillippy; Karen H Miga; Paolo Carnevali; Miten Jain; Benedict Paten
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Fluorescence-based bioassays for the detection and evaluation of food materials.

Authors:  Kentaro Nishi; Shin-Ichiro Isobe; Yun Zhu; Ryoiti Kiyama
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  BAIT: Organizing genomes and mapping rearrangements in single cells.

Authors:  Mark Hills; Kieran O'Neill; Ester Falconer; Ryan Brinkman; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 11.117

7.  Gamete binning: chromosome-level and haplotype-resolved genome assembly enabled by high-throughput single-cell sequencing of gamete genomes.

Authors:  José A Campoy; Hequan Sun; Manish Goel; Wen-Biao Jiao; Kat Folz-Donahue; Nan Wang; Manuel Rubio; Chang Liu; Christian Kukat; David Ruiz; Bruno Huettel; Korbinian Schneeberger
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  The structure, function and evolution of a complete human chromosome 8.

Authors:  Glennis A Logsdon; Mitchell R Vollger; PingHsun Hsieh; Yafei Mao; Mikhail A Liskovykh; Sergey Koren; Sergey Nurk; Ludovica Mercuri; Philip C Dishuck; Arang Rhie; Leonardo G de Lima; Tatiana Dvorkina; David Porubsky; William T Harvey; Alla Mikheenko; Andrey V Bzikadze; Milinn Kremitzki; Tina A Graves-Lindsay; Chirag Jain; Kendra Hoekzema; Shwetha C Murali; Katherine M Munson; Carl Baker; Melanie Sorensen; Alexandra M Lewis; Urvashi Surti; Jennifer L Gerton; Vladimir Larionov; Mario Ventura; Karen H Miga; Adam M Phillippy; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 69.504

Review 9.  Single cell genomics: advances and future perspectives.

Authors:  Iain C Macaulay; Thierry Voet
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  De novo assembly of haplotype-resolved genomes with trio binning.

Authors:  Sergey Koren; Arang Rhie; Brian P Walenz; Alexander T Dilthey; Derek M Bickhart; Sarah B Kingan; Stefan Hiendleder; John L Williams; Timothy P L Smith; Adam M Phillippy
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 54.908

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.