Literature DB >> 20016487

Identification of sister chromatids by DNA template strand sequences.

Ester Falconer1, Elizabeth A Chavez, Alexander Henderson, Steven S S Poon, Steven McKinney, Lindsay Brown, David G Huntsman, Peter M Lansdorp.   

Abstract

It is generally assumed that sister chromatids are genetically and functionally identical and that segregation to daughter cells is a random process. However, functional differences between sister chromatids regulate daughter cell fate in yeast and sister chromatid segregation is not random in Escherichia coli. Differentiated sister chromatids, coupled with non-random segregation, have been proposed to regulate cell fate during the development of multicellular organisms. This hypothesis has not been tested because molecular features to reliably distinguish between sister chromatids are not obvious. Here we show that parental 'Watson' and 'Crick' DNA template strands can be identified in sister chromatids of murine metaphase chromosomes using CO-FISH (chromosome orientation fluorescence in situ hybridization) with unidirectional probes specific for centromeric and telomeric repeats. All chromosomes were found to have a uniform orientation with the 5' end of the short arm on the same strand as T-rich major satellite repeats. The invariable orientation of repetitive DNA was used to differentially label sister chromatids and directly study mitotic segregation patterns in different cell types. Whereas sister chromatids appeared to be randomly distributed between daughter cells in cultured lung fibroblasts and embryonic stem cells, significant non-random sister chromatid segregation was observed in a subset of colon crypt epithelial cells, including cells outside positions reported for colon stem cells. Our results establish that DNA template sequences can be used to distinguish sister chromatids and follow their mitotic segregation in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20016487      PMCID: PMC3757939          DOI: 10.1038/nature08644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  35 in total

Review 1.  ES cell-mediated conditional transgenesis.

Authors:  M Gertsenstein; C Lobe; A Nagy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2002

2.  Strand-biased DNA methylation associated with centromeric regions in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Song Luo; Daphne Preuss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The germline stem cells of Drosophila melanogaster partition DNA non-randomly.

Authors:  Phillip Karpowicz; Milena Pellikka; Evelyn Chea; Dorothea Godt; Ulrich Tepass; Derek van der Kooy
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  The immortal strand hypothesis: how could it work?

Authors:  Daniel J Lew; Daniel J Burke; Anindya Dutta
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Cdc42 regulates GSK-3beta and adenomatous polyposis coli to control cell polarity.

Authors:  Sandrine Etienne-Manneville; Alan Hall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A role for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli protein in chromosome segregation.

Authors:  K B Kaplan; A A Burds; J R Swedlow; S S Bekir; P K Sorger; I S Näthke
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Orientation of asymmetric stem cell division by the APC tumor suppressor and centrosome.

Authors:  Yukiko M Yamashita; D Leanne Jones; Margaret T Fuller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Pericentromeric organization at the fusion point of mouse Robertsonian translocation chromosomes.

Authors:  S Garagna; N Marziliano; M Zuccotti; J B Searle; E Capanna; C A Redi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Asymmetric centrosome inheritance maintains neural progenitors in the neocortex.

Authors:  Xiaoqun Wang; Jin-Wu Tsai; Janice H Imai; Wei-Nan Lian; Richard B Vallee; Song-Hai Shi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Non-random segregation of sister chromosomes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Martin A White; John K Eykelenboom; Manuel A Lopez-Vernaza; Emily Wilson; David R F Leach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  51 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell ageing and non-random chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Gregory W Charville; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  When stem cells grow old: phenotypes and mechanisms of stem cell aging.

Authors:  Michael B Schultz; David A Sinclair
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  DNA asymmetry in stem cells - immortal or mortal?

Authors:  Swathi Yadlapalli; Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  TRAPping telomerase within the intestinal stem cell niche.

Authors:  Matthew F Pech; Steven E Artandi
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Asymmetric chromatid segregation in cardiac progenitor cells is enhanced by Pim-1 kinase.

Authors:  Balaji Sundararaman; Daniele Avitabile; Mathias H Konstandin; Christopher T Cottage; Natalie Gude; Mark A Sussman
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Random chromosome segregation in mouse intestinal epithelial stem cells.

Authors:  Catherine Legraverend; Philippe Jay
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 7.  Nonrandom sister chromatid segregation of sex chromosomes in Drosophila male germline stem cells.

Authors:  Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 8.  Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids?

Authors:  Peter M Lansdorp; Ester Falconer; Jiang Tao; Julie Brind'Amour; Ulrike Naumann
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Loss of maternal ATRX results in centromere instability and aneuploidy in the mammalian oocyte and pre-implantation embryo.

Authors:  Claudia Baumann; Maria M Viveiros; Rabindranath De La Fuente
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Immortalized, pre-malignant epithelial cell populations contain long-lived, label-retaining cells that asymmetrically divide and retain their template DNA.

Authors:  Karen M Bussard; Corinne A Boulanger; Frances S Kittrell; Fariba Behbod; Daniel Medina; Gilbert H Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.