Literature DB >> 22901250

Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids?

Peter M Lansdorp1, Ester Falconer, Jiang Tao, Julie Brind'Amour, Ulrike Naumann.   

Abstract

Semi-conservative replication ensures that the DNA sequence of sister chromatids is identical except for replication errors and variation in the length of telomere repeats resulting from replicative losses and variable end processing. What happens with the various epigenetic marks during DNA replication is less clear. Many chromatin marks are likely to be copied onto both sister chromatids in conjunction with DNA replication, whereas others could be distributed randomly between sister chromatids. Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids could also emerge in a more predictable manner, for example, following processes that are associated with lagging strand DNA replication. The resulting epigenetic differences between sister chromatids could result in different gene expression patterns in daughter cells. This possibility has been difficult to test because techniques to distinguish between parental sister chromatids require analysis of single cells and are not obvious. Here, we briefly review the topic of sister chromatid epigenetics and discuss how the identification of sister chromatids in cells could change the way we think about asymmetric cell divisions and stochastic variation in gene expression between cells in general and paired daughter cells in particular.
© 2012 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22901250      PMCID: PMC3753021          DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06505.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  35 in total

1.  Hairpin-bisulfite PCR: assessing epigenetic methylation patterns on complementary strands of individual DNA molecules.

Authors:  Charles D Laird; Nicole D Pleasant; Aaron D Clark; Jessica L Sneeden; K M Anwarul Hassan; Nathan C Manley; Jay C Vary; Todd Morgan; R Scott Hansen; Reinhard Stöger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing.

Authors:  Chryssa Kanellopoulou; Stefan A Muljo; Andrew L Kung; Shridar Ganesan; Ronny Drapkin; Thomas Jenuwein; David M Livingston; Klaus Rajewsky
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Differentiated parental DNA strands confer developmental asymmetry on daughter cells in fission yeast.

Authors:  A J Klar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Apr 2-8       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Characterization of Dicer-deficient murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Murchison; Janet F Partridge; Oliver H Tam; Sihem Cheloufi; Gregory J Hannon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Transcripts from opposite strands of gamma satellite DNA are differentially expressed during mouse development.

Authors:  F Rudert; S Bronner; J M Garnier; P Dollé
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  The segregation of DNA in epithelial stem cells.

Authors:  C S Potten; W J Hume; P Reid; J Cairns
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Relationship between histone H3 lysine 9 methylation, transcription repression, and heterochromatin protein 1 recruitment.

Authors:  M David Stewart; Jiwen Li; Jiemin Wong
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Cdc42 regulates GSK-3beta and adenomatous polyposis coli to control cell polarity.

Authors:  Sandrine Etienne-Manneville; Alan Hall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands.

Authors:  Gilbert H Smith
Journal:  Development       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Orientation of asymmetric stem cell division by the APC tumor suppressor and centrosome.

Authors:  Yukiko M Yamashita; D Leanne Jones; Margaret T Fuller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  Single-cell template strand sequencing by Strand-seq enables the characterization of individual homologs.

Authors:  Ashley D Sanders; Ester Falconer; Mark Hills; Diana C J Spierings; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 2.  The Inherent Asymmetry of DNA Replication.

Authors:  Jonathan Snedeker; Matthew Wooten; Xin Chen
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 3.  Strand-seq: a unifying tool for studies of chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Ester Falconer; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Nonrandom sister chromatid segregation mediates rDNA copy number maintenance in Drosophila.

Authors:  George J Watase; Jonathan O Nelson; Yukiko M Yamashita
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 14.957

5.  Karyotype features of trematode Himasthla elongata.

Authors:  Anna I Solovyeva; Vera N Stefanova; Olga I Podgornaya; Serghei Iu Demin
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  The mre11 A470 alleles influence the hereditability and the segregation of telosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  In-Joon Baek; Daniel S Moss; Arthur J Lustig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Centromere function in asymmetric cell division in Drosophila female and male germline stem cells.

Authors:  Antje M Kochendoerfer; Federica Modafferi; Elaine M Dunleavy
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 6.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.