BACKGROUND: The ABC (ATP-binding cassette) gene superfamily is widespread across all living species. The majority of ABC genes encode ABC transporters, which are membrane-spanning proteins capable of transferring substrates across biological membranes by hydrolyzing ATP. Although ABC transporters have often been associated with resistance to drugs and toxic compounds, within the Arthropoda ABC gene families have only been characterized in detail in several insects and a crustacean. In this study, we report a genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the ABC gene superfamily in the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, a chelicerate ~ 450 million years diverged from other Arthropod lineages. T. urticae is a major agricultural pest, and is among of the most polyphagous arthropod herbivores known. The species resists a staggering array of toxic plant secondary metabolites, and has developed resistance to all major classes of pesticides in use for its control. RESULTS: We identified 103 ABC genes in the T. urticae genome, the highest number discovered in a metazoan species to date. Within the T. urticae ABC gene set, all members of the eight currently described subfamilies (A to H) were detected. A phylogenetic analysis revealed that the high number of ABC genes in T. urticae is due primarily to lineage-specific expansions of ABC genes within the ABCC, ABCG and ABCH subfamilies. In particular, the ABCC subfamily harbors the highest number of T. urticae ABC genes (39). In a comparative genomic analysis, we found clear orthologous relationships between a subset of T. urticae ABC proteins and ABC proteins in both vertebrates and invertebrates known to be involved in fundamental cellular processes. These included members of the ABCB-half transporters, and the ABCD, ABCE and ABCF families. Furthermore, one-to-one orthologues could be distinguished between T. urticae proteins and human ABCC10, ABCG5 and ABCG8, the Drosophila melanogaster sulfonylurea receptor and ecdysone-regulated transporter E23. Finally, expression profiling revealed that ABC genes in the ABCC, ABCG ABCH subfamilies were differentially expressed in multi-pesticide resistant mite strains and/or in mites transferred to challenging (toxic) host plants. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we present the first comprehensive analysis of ABC genes in a polyphagous arthropod herbivore. We demonstrate that the broad plant host range and high levels of pesticide resistance in T. urticae are associated with lineage-specific expansions of ABC genes, many of which respond transcriptionally to xenobiotic exposure. This ABC catalogue will serve as a basis for future biochemical and toxicological studies. Obtaining functional evidence that these ABC subfamilies contribute to xenobiotic tolerance should be the priority of future research.
BACKGROUND: The ABC (ATP-binding cassette) gene superfamily is widespread across all living species. The majority of ABC genes encode ABC transporters, which are membrane-spanning proteins capable of transferring substrates across biological membranes by hydrolyzing ATP. Although ABC transporters have often been associated with resistance to drugs and toxic compounds, within the Arthropoda ABC gene families have only been characterized in detail in several insects and a crustacean. In this study, we report a genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the ABC gene superfamily in the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, a chelicerate ~ 450 million years diverged from other Arthropod lineages. T. urticae is a major agricultural pest, and is among of the most polyphagous arthropod herbivores known. The species resists a staggering array of toxic plant secondary metabolites, and has developed resistance to all major classes of pesticides in use for its control. RESULTS: We identified 103 ABC genes in the T. urticae genome, the highest number discovered in a metazoan species to date. Within the T. urticaeABC gene set, all members of the eight currently described subfamilies (A to H) were detected. A phylogenetic analysis revealed that the high number of ABC genes in T. urticae is due primarily to lineage-specific expansions of ABC genes within the ABCC, ABCG and ABCH subfamilies. In particular, the ABCC subfamily harbors the highest number of T. urticaeABC genes (39). In a comparative genomic analysis, we found clear orthologous relationships between a subset of T. urticae ABC proteins and ABC proteins in both vertebrates and invertebrates known to be involved in fundamental cellular processes. These included members of the ABCB-half transporters, and the ABCD, ABCE and ABCF families. Furthermore, one-to-one orthologues could be distinguished between T. urticae proteins and humanABCC10, ABCG5 and ABCG8, the Drosophila melanogastersulfonylurea receptor and ecdysone-regulated transporter E23. Finally, expression profiling revealed that ABC genes in the ABCC, ABCGABCH subfamilies were differentially expressed in multi-pesticide resistant mite strains and/or in mites transferred to challenging (toxic) host plants. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we present the first comprehensive analysis of ABC genes in a polyphagous arthropod herbivore. We demonstrate that the broad plant host range and high levels of pesticide resistance in T. urticae are associated with lineage-specific expansions of ABC genes, many of which respond transcriptionally to xenobiotic exposure. This ABC catalogue will serve as a basis for future biochemical and toxicological studies. Obtaining functional evidence that these ABC subfamilies contribute to xenobiotic tolerance should be the priority of future research.
ATP-binding cassette (ABC) proteins form one of the largest protein families that are present in all living organisms on earth. The majority of ABC proteins are membrane bound primary transporters, using ATP to translocate substrates across extra- and intracellular membranes. In addition, these ABC transporters are mostly uniporters, mediating the unidirectional translocation of a substrate [1-4]. The Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) is another large transporter family present in all living organisms, but as opposed to ABC transporters, it comprises secondary carriers that can be either uniporters, symporters or antiporters [5]. In most ABC proteins two types of domains can be distinguished, an ATP-binding domain (also named the nucleotide binding domain (NBD)) and a transmembrane domain (TMD). The highly conserved NBD contains three motifs: a Walker A and Walker B domain and the ABC signature (LSSG-motif). The NBD binds and hydrolyses ATP and provides energy to transport substrates. The TMD consists of five to six membrane spanning helices and provides the specificity for the substrate. Full transporters comprise two NBDs and two TMDs while half transporters have only one of each type and require homo- or heterodimerization to form a functional unit [1-4]. Based on the homology of their NBDs, ABC proteins have been divided into seven subfamilies, ABCA to ABCH [1,6]. Interestingly, the ABCH subfamily was discovered during analysis of the Drosophila melanogaster genome and is present in all sequenced arthropod genomes to date and teleost fish, but not in mammals, plants or fungi [6-16].In humans, ABC proteins mainly function in the membrane transport of substrates, including amino acids, sugars, lipids, inorganic ions, polysaccharides, metals, peptides, toxic metabolites and drugs [2,4]. In addition to transporters, the humanABC protein superfamily also contains ion channels (CFTR), receptors (SUR1 and 2) and proteins involved in translation (humanABCE and ABCF1, 2 and 3) [1]. Mutations in ABC genes have been linked to several human disorders, like cystic fibrosis, adrenoleukodystrophy, sitosterolemia and diabetes [17,18]. Furthermore, within the ABCB, C and G subfamilies, many genes code for proteins that contribute to resistance of cancer cells against chemotherapeutic agents: the multidrug resistance proteins or P-glycoproteins (MDR or P-gps, members of the ABCB subfamily), the multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRP, members of the ABCC subfamily) and the breast cancer protein (BCRP or humanABCG2) [19,20]. In insects, it has been shown that ABC transporters have functions that affect metabolism, development and resistance to xenobiotics including insecticides and plant secondary toxic compounds (allelochemicals) [14]. Some ABC transporters have specific functions that are well documented in arthropods. In D. melanogaster the ABCC transporter Mdr49 controls the export of a germ cell attractant [21]. D. melanogaster white, on the other hand, is a member of the ABCG subfamily and is involved in the uptake of pigment precursors in the developing eye [22]. Its orthologs in Bombyx mori (Bmwh3) and T. castaneum (TcABCG-9B) have similar functions, and w-3B. mori mutants and TcABCG-9B dsRNA injected adult beetles have white eyes [8,23]. In the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, orthologs of humanP-gps are essential as they prevent the influx of nicotine across the blood brain barrier [24,25]. Insect orthologs of humanP-gps and MRPs have also been frequently linked to pesticide resistance [26-29]. Resistance to pesticides in insects is either related to reduced target-site sensitivity or sequestration/metabolism of the pesticide before it reaches the target site by quantitative or qualitative changes of genes involved in the detoxification process [30,31]. These “detoxification” genes comprise members of the P450 mono-oxygenases (P450s), glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs), carboxyl/cholinesterases (CCEs) and also the less known ABC transporters. Although the ABC transporters have often been overlooked in studies that describe the detoxification toolkit in sequenced insect genomes [32-34], clear examples of their importance in detoxification have been documented. For example, Lanning et al. [28] showed that increased expression of humanP-gp orthologues in H. virescens was associated with resistance to thiodicarb, and a mutation in the same ABCC member of four different lepidopteran species was recently associated with resistance to the Cry1A toxin [27,29].Complete and correctly annotated gene inventories are a prerequisite to study the biological role and evolutionary history of ABC genes. Among arthropods, detailed studies of ABC families have been published for members of several different insect orders [1,8,9,12,14,16] and the crustacean Daphnia pulex[11]. In contrast, besides the identification of nine ABC genes in the mange mite Sarcoptes scabiei[35], there are no reported studies in the subphylum Chelicerata (spiders, scorpions, mites and ticks), one of the most diverse groups of terrestrial animals [36]. Recently, the first published draft genome sequence of a chelicerate, the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, was reported [37]. The spider mite is one of the most polyphagous herbivores known, and has been documented to feed on more than 1,100 plant species that belong to more than 140 different plant families, including many that produce toxic compounds [38,39]. In addition, spider mites are major agricultural pests and are the “resistance champion” among arthropods as they have the most documented instances of resistance to diverse pesticides [31,40]. The molecular mechanisms underlying spider mite resistance to xenobiotics (pesticides and allelochemicals) are less understood compared to insects [31,41]. However, the availability of the draft genome sequence now provides unique information and tools for the study of the role of gene families involved in xenobiotic metabolism in spider mites [42-44]. Characterization of spider mite gene families associated with detoxification of xenobiotics, including ABC genes, is the first step towards a better understanding of how spider mites cope with these compounds [44]. An initial preliminary analysis of ABC genes in the spider mite genome focused solely on ABCB and ABCC subfamilies [37], and lacked a complete description of the phylogenetic relationships with other metazoan ABCs. In this study, we provide a detailed comparison of all ABC subfamilies (ABCA-ABCH) in T. urticae with those of the insect D. melanogaster, the crustacean D. pulex, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and the mammalHomo sapiens. Further, we show that expression levels of ABC genes change in pesticide resistant strains and when new and challenging plant host are encountered. Our analyses will facilitate biochemical and toxicological studies of the role of T. urticaeABC transporters in spider mite physiology, and in particular the extraordinary host range and pesticide resistance development.
Results and discussion
Identification of spider mite ABC genes
We identified 103 putative ABC genes in the genome of T. urticae (Table 1). To our knowledge, this is the largest number of ABC genes reported for any metazoan species so far [8,9,13,45]. Of all organisms sequenced to date, only the protozoan ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila has more ABC genes [46]. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis grouped the T. urticae ABC proteins into each of the eight known ABC subfamilies with high bootstrap support (Figure 1, Additional file 1). We identified 9, 4, 39, 2, 1, 3, 23 and 22 ABC proteins belonging to the ABCA, ABCB, ABCC, ABCD, ABCE, ABCF, ABCG and ABCH subfamilies, respectively (Table 2). Significant homology (E-value ≤ e-4) with one of the 103 putative T. urticaeABC genes was found at an additional 41 loci in the T. urticae genome. However, gene models at these loci, most of which had homology to the ABCC or ABCH subfamilies, lacked one or both vital domains (NBDs, TMD) of canonical ABC genes. These likely represent gene fragments or pseudogenized genes, and were excluded from detailed analysis (Additional file 2). From the 103 full-length T. urticaeABC genes, almost half (48) are located on only 5 genomic scaffolds (11, 9, 6, 11 and 10 ABC genes on scaffold 1, 3, 4, 9 and 11, respectively). In addition, a high complexity was observed within gene structures, with exon numbers ranging from 1 to 20 (Table 1). To determine the accurate evolutionary position of the 103 T. urticae ABC proteins, phylogenetic analyses, including full-length ABC protein sequences from the draft genomes of T. urticae and D. pulex and from the finished genomes of C. elegans, D. melanogaster and H. sapiens, were performed for each subfamily separately. The results of these analyses are discussed below.
Table 1
Characterisation of 103 . ABC proteins
Subfamily
Tetur ID1
Name
Length(AA)
Strand
Exons
Topology2
N-Glc3
O-Glc4
A (9)
tetur01g00580
TuABCA-01
1659
-
5
(6TM-NBD)2
5
tetur01g15090
TuABCA-02
1639
+
4
(7/8TM-NBD)2
2
1
tetur11g05030
TuABCA-03
1670
-
5
(5/6TM-NBD)2
3
tetur11g05040
TuABCA-04
1670
-
5
(6TM-NBD)2
2
tetur11g05200
TuABCA-05
1672
-
5
(6TM-NBD)2
2
tetur15g01990
TuABCA-06
1666
+
5
(6TM -NBD)2
3
tetur25g01640
TuABCA-07
2302
+
20
(6TM-NBD)2
8
tetur27g01890
TuABCA-08
2082
+
2
(7/4TM-NBD)2
5
27
tetur30g01960
TuABCA-09
1651
-
5
(6/8TM-NBD)2
3
B (4)
tetur11g04030
TuABCB-01
1294
+
15
(6TM-NBD)2
4
tetur11g04040
TuABCB-02
1292
+
16
(6TM-NBD)2
4
tetur17g02000
TuABCB-03
688
-
8
4TM-NBD
1
tetur32g01330
TuABCB-04
656
-
8
5TM-NBD
3
C (39)
tetur01g07880
TuABCC-01
1507
+
11
5TM-(5TM-NBD)2
1
2
tetur01g10390
TuABCC-02
1529
+
11
7TM-(5TM-NBD)2
tetur01g15310
TuABCC-03
1299
+
15
(5/6TM-NBD)2
5
1
tetur01g15330
TuABCC-04
1328
+
14
(7TM-NBD)2
5
tetur01g15340
TuABCC-05
1338
+
14
(8/7TM-NBD)2
3
tetur03g02240
TuABCC-06
1375
-
12
(6TM-NBD)2
2
tetur03g07460
TuABCC-07
1481
-
11
6TM-(5TM-NBD)2
2
tetur03g07490
TuABCC-08
1483
-
11
6TM-(5TM-NBD)2
1
tetur03g07840
TuABCC-09
1457
-
5
5TM-(6TM-NBD)2
1
tetur03g09800
TuABCC-10
1490
+
11
6TM-(5TM-NBD)2
1
tetur03g09880
TuABCC-11
1495
+
11
4TM-(5TM-NBD)2
1
1
tetur04g04360
TuABCC-12
1522
+
5
8TM-(5TM-NBD)2
3
tetur04g05540
TuABCC-13
1503
+
8
6TM-(5TM-NBD)2
5
tetur04g07860
TuABCC-14
1501
-
8
7TM-(4TM-NBD)2
3
tetur04g07910
TuABCC-15
1493
-
8
6TM-(5TM-NBD)2
2
tetur05g01110
TuABCC-16
1522
-
11
4TM-(5TM-NBD)2
6
1
tetur05g04300
TuABCC-17
1490
+
8
5TM-(6TM-NBD)2
6
2
tetur06g00360
TuABCC-18
1516
+
11
6TM-(5TM-NBD)2
4
1
tetur06g03510
TuABCC-19
1343
+
6
(6TM-NBD)2
2
tetur06g03560
TuABCC-20
1339
+
6
(5/7TM-NBD)2
2
tetur07g04290
TuABCC-21
1324
-
5
(6TM-NBD)2
1
tetur07g04410
TuABCC-22
1324
+
5
(6TM-NBD)2
1
tetur09g00580
TuABCC-23
1506
+
8
7TM-(6TM-NBD)2
2
tetur09g00590
TuABCC-24
1496
+
9
6TM-(6TM-NBD)2
1
tetur09g04610
TuABCC-25
1521
+
8
7TM-(6TM-NBD)2
4
1
tetur09g04620
TuABCC-26
1501
+
8
6TM-(5TM-NBD)2
5
tetur11g02060
TuABCC-27
1499
-
11
4TM-(6TM-NBD)2
1
tetur11g02120
TuABCC-28
1492
+
11
6TM-(4TM-NBD)2
2
1
tetur11g05990
TuABCC-29
1683
-
15
5TM-(6TM-NBD)2
6
tetur14g02290
TuABCC-30
1309
-
16
(5/7TM-NBD)2
4
tetur14g02300
TuABCC-31
1312
-
16
(5/7TM-NBD)2
5
tetur14g02310
TuABCC-32
1308
-
16
(6/7TM-NBD)2
3
1
tetur14g02320
TuABCC-33
1309
-
16
(7TM-NBD)2
2
1
tetur14g02330
TuABCC-34
1309
-
16
(5/7TM-NBD)2
2
tetur16g03480
TuABCC-35
1513
-
11
6TM-(5TM-NBD)2
2
1
tetur23g02452
TuABCC-36
1344
-
6
(8/6TM-NBD)2
2
tetur25g01780
TuABCC-37
1525
+
12
5TM-(5TM-NBD)2
tetur28g01950
TuABCC-38
1287
+
7
(6TM-NBD)2
3
tetur40g00010
TuABCC-39
1490
+
11
5TM-(5TM-NBD)2
1
D (2)
tetur05g06640
TuABCD-01
829
+
4
5TM-NBD
2
1
tetur35g01360
TuABCD-02
656
+
5
5TM-NBD
4
E (1)
tetur30g01400
TuABCE-01
614
-
2
NBD-NBD
F (3)
tetur20g02610
TuABCF-01
612
+
4
NBD-NBD
3
tetur29g00620
TuABCF-02
584
+
1
NBD-NBD
3
tetur32g00490
TuABCF-03
718
-
4
NBD-NBD
4
G (23)
tetur01g16280
TuABCG-01
915
-
6
NBD-7TM
1
1
tetur01g16290
TuABCG-02
643
+
3
NBD-6TM
1
tetur02g11270
TuABCG-03
689
+
11
NBD-6TM
1
tetur02g11400
TuABCG-04
811
-
2
NBD-6TM
3
1
tetur02g13710
TuABCG-05
810
-
2
NBD-6TM
3
tetur03g04350
TuABCG-06
687
-
2
NBD-6TM
2
tetur04g04550
TuABCG-07
720
+
2
NBD-6TM
3
1
tetur05g05440
TuABCG-08
721
+
2
NBD-8TM
1
1
tetur06g05430
TuABCG-09
646
-
12
NBD-7TM
3
tetur09g01930
TuABCG-10
685
+
9
NBD-5TM
2
tetur09g01950
TuABCG-11
682
+
9
NBD-5TM
1
tetur09g01960
TuABCG-12
683
+
9
NBD-5TM
3
tetur09g01970
TuABCG-13
687
+
9
NBD-6TM
3
tetur09g01980
TuABCG-14
680
+
9
NBD-6TM
4
tetur09g01990
TuABCG-15
687
+
9
NBD-6TM
2
4
tetur09g02000
TuABCG-16
682
+
9
NBD-7TM
3
tetur11g00520
TuABCG-17
792
-
1
NBD-8TM
2
3
tetur11g01800
TuABCG-18
790
-
1
NBD-8TM
2
3
tetur17g02510
TuABCG-19
832
-
4
NBD-4TM
2
1
tetur17g03970
TuABCG-20
700
-
2
NBD-8TM
5
tetur19g01160
TuABCG-21
775
-
1
NBD-7TM
4
2
tetur33g01719
TuABCG-22
760
+
1
NBD-6TM
1
tetur37g01090
TuABCG-23
779
-
1
NBD-7TM
1
14
H (22)
tetur01g03530
TuABCH-01
827
+
1
NBD-8TM
6
7
tetur01g05940
TuABCH-02
766
-
6
NBD-6TM
2
2
tetur01g05970
TuABCH-03
734
-
6
NBD-6TM
1
1
tetur03g03080
TuABCH-04
767
-
2
NBD-8TM
3
tetur03g05300
TuABCH-05
738
-
1
NBD-6TM
1
tetur04g06390
TuABCH-06
707
+
1
NBD-7TM
2
1
tetur05g05000
TuABCH-07
713
+
1
NBD-7TM
3
tetur07g05200
TuABCH-08
764
-
4
NBD-6TM
tetur12g03340
TuABCH-09
744
-
1
NBD-5TM
1
tetur12g03910
TuABCH-10
713
+
1
NBD-7TM
3
tetur13g02010
TuABCH-11
703
-
1
NBD-8TM
2
1
tetur13g02060
TuABCH-12
723
-
1
NBD-7TM
3
tetur18g00230
TuABCH-13
735
-
2
NBD-8TM
4
20
tetur19g01780
TuABCH-14
692
-
1
NBD-7TM
5
2
tetur21g00940
TuABCH-15
716
+
2
NBD-6TM
1
1
tetur26g02620
TuABCH-16
708
-
10
NBD-7TM
2
4
tetur28g00780
TuABCH-17
726
-
1
NBD-8TM
1
2
tetur28g00870
TuABCH-18
720
+
1
NBD-7TM
3
1
tetur30g00890
TuABCH-19
721
-
1
NBD-7TM
2
tetur32g01710
TuABCH-20
804
-
1
NBD-6TM
2
4
tetur36g00240
TuABCH-21
777
-
1
NBD-6TM
3
1
tetur36g00630
TuABCH-22
704
-
1
NBD-6TM
1
1T. urticae gene models can be accessed at the ORCAE genome portal, http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/orcae/overview/Tetur[120].
2 transmembrane helices (TMs) were predicted using the SCAMPI server [128] while nucleotide binding domains (NBD) were determined using the ScanProSite facility [121] and Prosite profile PS50893; ( )2 indicates that the T. urticae ABC protein is a full transporter.
3 N-glycosylation sites were predicted using NetNGlyc 1.0 server [131]; only N-glycosylation site with a “potential” score > 0.5 and with a jury agreement were taken into account.
4O-glycosylation sites were predicted using NetOGlyc 3.1 server [132]; if the G-score was higher than 0.5 the residue was considered to be O-glycosylated; in this table the total number of O-glycosylated sites (glycosylated serines and threonines) is shown.
Figure 1
Unrooted phylogenetic tree of N-terminal NBDs of 103 ABC proteins of . Amino acid sequences of NBDs were aligned using MUSCLE [122] and subjected to a maximum likelihood analysis using Treefinder [124]. For amino acid alignment, amino acid substitution model and likelihood score of the constructed phylogenetic tree see Additional file 9 and Additional file 10. Numbers at important nodes represent the bootstrap values resulting from 1000 pseudoreplicates (LR-ELW). The scale bar represents 0.5 amino-acid substitutions per site. The different ABC protein subfamilies are indicated by shaded colors. T. urticae ABC protein sequences can be found in Additional file 12.
Table 2
ABC subfamilies in . , . , . , . , . , . and .
ABC subfamily*
S. cerevisiae
C. elegans
H. sapiens
D. melanogaster
T. castaneum
D. pulex
T. urticae
A
0
7
12
10
9
4
10
B-full
1
14
4
4
4
2
2
B-half
3
10
7
4
2
5
2
C
6
9
12
14
35
7
39
D
2
5
4
2
2
3
2
E
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
F
6
3
3
3
3
4
3
G
10
9
5
15
13
24
23
H
0
0
0
3
3
15
22
TOTAL
30
58
48
56
73
65
103
* numbers were derived from [8,9,11] and this study; one additional ABCG transporter was identified for D. pulex (Dappu1_300887) in this study resulting in 65 D. pulex ABCs; a C. elegans ABCB half transporter discussed by [62] was added to the number of C. elegans ABCB half transporters resulting in 58 ABC transporters for C. elegans.
Characterisation of 103 . ABC proteins1T. urticae gene models can be accessed at the ORCAE genome portal, http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/orcae/overview/Tetur[120].2 transmembrane helices (TMs) were predicted using the SCAMPI server [128] while nucleotide binding domains (NBD) were determined using the ScanProSite facility [121] and Prosite profile PS50893; ( )2 indicates that the T. urticaeABC protein is a full transporter.3 N-glycosylation sites were predicted using NetNGlyc 1.0 server [131]; only N-glycosylation site with a “potential” score > 0.5 and with a jury agreement were taken into account.4O-glycosylation sites were predicted using NetOGlyc 3.1 server [132]; if the G-score was higher than 0.5 the residue was considered to be O-glycosylated; in this table the total number of O-glycosylated sites (glycosylated serines and threonines) is shown.Unrooted phylogenetic tree of N-terminal NBDs of 103 ABC proteins of . Amino acid sequences of NBDs were aligned using MUSCLE [122] and subjected to a maximum likelihood analysis using Treefinder [124]. For amino acid alignment, amino acid substitution model and likelihood score of the constructed phylogenetic tree see Additional file 9 and Additional file 10. Numbers at important nodes represent the bootstrap values resulting from 1000 pseudoreplicates (LR-ELW). The scale bar represents 0.5 amino-acid substitutions per site. The different ABC protein subfamilies are indicated by shaded colors. T. urticaeABC protein sequences can be found in Additional file 12.ABC subfamilies in . , . , . , . , . , . and .* numbers were derived from [8,9,11] and this study; one additional ABCG transporter was identified for D. pulex (Dappu1_300887) in this study resulting in 65 D. pulexABCs; a C. elegansABCB half transporter discussed by [62] was added to the number of C. elegansABCB half transporters resulting in 58 ABC transporters for C. elegans.The ABCA family comprises 9 full transporters (hereafter FTs) in T. urticae. In contrast to plants and some insects, no ABCA half transporters (hereafter HTs) were identified (Table 1) [9,12,47]. The T. urticaeABCA subfamily contains the largest T. urticaeABC protein, tetur25g01640 (2302 amino acids) (Table 1). ABCAs share a distinct set of characteristics across species: an extracellular loop between the first and second transmembrane helices (TMs), a conserved motif downstream of each NBD [48] and a conserved motif at the N-terminus (xLxxKN, [49]). All T. urticaeABCAs have a characteristic extracellular loop between the first and the second TMs of each TMD (see Additional file 3 for position of TMs). The conserved motif downstream of each NBD was, except for tetur25g01640, present in all T. urticaeABCAs, while the N-terminus conserved motif could only be found in a single T. urticaeABCA (tetur25g01640). Instead of xLxxKN, the remainder of T. urticaeABCAs harbor either a xMxxKD/S (7) or xLxxHR (1) N-terminal motif. A phylogenetic analysis of metazoan ABCAs is shown in Additional file 4. Six T. urticaeABCAs (tetur01g00580, tetur11g05030, tetur11g05040, tetur11g05200, tetur15g01990 and tetur30g01960) clustered together with high bootstrap support. These six ABCAs show high amino acid identity (62.3-94.1%, Additional file 5) and have identical exonic structure (Additional file 3), indicating they might have arisen by recent duplication events. Together with tetur01g15090, they form a sister-group with D. melanogasterCG31731, an ABCA reported to be down regulated in the salivary glands of an E93 mutant of D. melanogaster ([50]; the early ecdysone responsive gene E93 is a critical regulator of programmed cell death during D. melanogaster metamorphosis). D. melanogasterCG31731 and the seven T. urticaeABCA genes cluster together, albeit with moderate bootstrap support, with a group of C. elegansABCA transporters. The latter contains Ced-7, which is involved in the engulfment of cell corpses during programmed cell death in C. elegans[51].Further, tetur27g01890 and D. melanogasterCG34120 form a sister clade of humanABCA12 and ABCA13, while tetur25g01640, D. pulex Dappu1-312055 and Dappu1-312056 cluster with humanABCA1, ABCA2, ABCA4 and ABCA7 (Additional file 4). These humanABCAs contain conserved predicted N-glycosylation sites at N400, N1453 and N1637 of humanABCA1 [48]. In addition, it has been experimentally shown that D. melanogasterCG34120 is also glycosylated at an asparagine (N272, at NASFEEL motif of CG34120 [52]) aligning with one of these conserved sites (N400 of humanABCA1). The tetur27g01890 and tetur25g01640 proteins also have many predicted N-glycosylation sites (Table 1) of which at least one (N303 in tetur27g01890; N1705 in tetur25g01640) is shared with those conserved in humanABCA1, 2, 4, 7 and 12. In humans, these ABCAs have highly specialized roles in phospho- and sphingolipid export [48]. For example, humanABCA1 controls the initial steps leading to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) formation at the cell membrane and is crucial for reverse cholesterol transport from peripheral tissues to the liver [53]. HumanABCA12 works as an epidermal keratinocyte lipid transporter and a defective ABCA12 results in loss of the skin lipid barrier [54,55]. Although we cannot assign such highly specific roles to the two T. urticaeABCA orthologues above, they may also be involved in lipid transport processes.The ABCB subfamily consists of 2 FTs and 2 HTs in T. urticae (Table 1). A phylogenetic analysis of ABCB FTs revealed that transporters of each species in the analysis clustered into separate clades, confirming an earlier hypothesis by Sturm et al. that this subfamily has diversified through lineage-specific duplications [11] (Figure 2A). This diversification hypothesis is supported in mites by the fact that the T. urticaeABCB FTs, tetur11g04030 and tetur11g04040, have well-supported phylogenetic clustering, similar exon patterns (15 and 16 exons for tetur11g04030 and tetur11g04040, respectively (see Additional file 3)) and high amino acid identity (64.8%, see Additional file 5). T. urticaeABCB FTs form a sistergroup to a clade of C. elegans, H. sapiens and D. melanogasterABCB FTs. The function of most members of this clade has been well documented in literature. HumanABCB FT, originally termed P-glycoproteins (P-gps) but now also known as multiple drug resistance (MDR) proteins, are among the best characterized ABC pumps and have been shown to be involved in transport of hydrophobic substrates including drugs, lipids, steroids, xenobiotics and peptides (Dean et al. 2001). The precise role of their orthologues in Drosophila has been a focus of recent study. D. melanogasterMdr65 has been shown to function as an orthologue of humanABCB1/MDR1, a major ABC transporter of cytotoxic xenobiotics at the human blood–brain barrier, and is required for chemical protection of the fruitfly brain [56] while Mdr49 has been shown to be essential in germ cell migration [21]. Interestingly, arthropod ABCB FT orthologues have frequently been linked to pesticide resistance [14,26]. For example, inhibition of a H. virescens orthologue of humanABCB1 by the P-gp inhibitor quinidine decreased the toxicity of thiodicarb by 12.5-fold in a resistant strain, compared to 1.8-fold in a susceptible strain [28]. Recently, it was found that pretreatment of D. melanogaster with the P-gp inhibitor verapamil reduced the toxicity of DDT by 10-fold in a resistant strain [57]. The involvement of P-gps in pesticide resistance is probably best documented for ivermectin resistance. This compound has been shown to be a substrate for both mammalian as insect-pgps and several cases of P-gp associated ivermectin resistance have been reported [26,58-60].
Figure 2
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCB full and half transporters of five metazoan species: (A) ABCB full transporters, (B) ABCB half transporters. Full-length ABC proteins were aligned using MUSCLE [122] and subjected to a maximum likelihood analysis using Treefinder [124]. The resulting tree was midpoint rooted. For amino acid alignment, amino acid substitution model and likelihood score of the constructed phylogenetic tree see Additional file 9 and Additional file 10. Numbers at the branch point of each node represent the bootstrap value resulting from 1000 pseudoreplicates (LR-ELW). Species, abbreviations, and color codes are: Ce, C. elegans (purple); h, H. sapiens (green); Dm, D. melanogaster (red); Dp, D. pulex (yellow); and tetur, T. urticae (blue). The scale bar represents 0.2 and 0.5 amino-acid substitutions per site in Figure 2A and Figure 2B, respectively. Accession numbers of metazoan ABC protein sequences can be found in Additional file 11 while T. urticae ABC protein sequences can be found in Additional file 12.
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCB full and half transporters of five metazoan species: (A) ABCB full transporters, (B) ABCB half transporters. Full-length ABC proteins were aligned using MUSCLE [122] and subjected to a maximum likelihood analysis using Treefinder [124]. The resulting tree was midpoint rooted. For amino acid alignment, amino acid substitution model and likelihood score of the constructed phylogenetic tree see Additional file 9 and Additional file 10. Numbers at the branch point of each node represent the bootstrap value resulting from 1000 pseudoreplicates (LR-ELW). Species, abbreviations, and color codes are: Ce, C. elegans (purple); h, H. sapiens (green); Dm, D. melanogaster (red); Dp, D. pulex (yellow); and tetur, T. urticae (blue). The scale bar represents 0.2 and 0.5 amino-acid substitutions per site in Figure 2A and Figure 2B, respectively. Accession numbers of metazoan ABC protein sequences can be found in Additional file 11 while T. urticaeABC protein sequences can be found in Additional file 12.A phylogenetic analysis of ABCB HTs revealed, as was also shown by Sturm et al. [11], clear orthologous relationships between ABCB HTs, suggesting they have evolutionary conserved roles in metazoan species (Figure 2B). In the case of T. urticaeABCB HTs, an orthologous relationship between tetur32g01330 and D. melanogasterCG7955, D. pulex Dappu1-347270, C. elegansABTM-1 and humanABCB7 was found, while tetur17g02000 groups together with D. melanogasterCG1824, D. pulex Dappu1-347266, C. elegansHaf-6, and humanABCB8. As both tetur32g01330 and tetur17g02000 are predicted (data not shown) to have a mitochondrial targeting signal, these T. urticae transporters are most likely trafficked to the mitochondria, as has been demonstrated for their human orthologues (humanABCB7 and ABCB8) [61]. This suggests that tetur32g01330 and tetur17g02000 fulfill a similar role as their human orthologues. The humanABCB7 protein plays a crucial role in iron homeostasis in the cytoplasm and mutations in this gene have been linked to several diseases [61]. Recently, it was also shown that disruption of the C. elegans orthologue (ABTM-1) of humanABCB7 induced oxidative stress and premature cell death [62]. Furthermore, an orthologue (GenBank acc. No. AAEL006717) of humanABCB7 in the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti, was reported to be upregulated in an insecticide resistant strain [9,63]. The function of humanABCB8 is not well understood, but it was shown to mediate resistance against the chemotherapeutic agent doxorubicin in melanoma cells [64,65]. Also, Ichikawa et al. found that disruption of the mouse orthologue of humanABCB8 lead to cardiomyopathy and decreased mitochondrial iron export [66]. Orthologues of the remaining human mitochondrial transporters, ABCB6 and ABCB10, could be identified in D. pulex, D. melanogaster and C. elegans but were not found in T. urticae[1,11] (Figure 2B). Interestingly, the localization of humanABCB6 is currently under debate, as some studies suggest that it is located in lysosomes [67]. Finally, similar to Sturm et al. [11], we did not identify arthropod orthologues of humanABCB HTs related to antigen processing (humanABCB2, ABCB3 and ABCB9) (Figure 2B).The ABCC subfamily consists of 39 transporters in T. urticae. To our knowledge, this is the largest number of ABCC transporters reported in any metazoan species, including the flour beetle, T. castaneum, which also has an exceptionally large number of ABCCs [8,9] (Table 2). ABCC proteins are FTs, bearing 2 TMDs and 2 NBDs, with diverse functions: ion transport, cell-surface receptor activity and translocation of a broad array of substrates like drugs, cyclic nucleotides, endogenous compounds and their glutathione conjugates and glutathione [19,68-70]. Because of their ability to extrude drugs, many of these ABCCs are also termed multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRPs) [1]. MRPs can be categorized according to the presence or absence of a third N-terminal transmembrane-spanning domain (TMD0) . In humans, “long” MRPs like ABCC1, 2, 3, 6 and 10 (MRP1, 2, 3, 6 and 7, respectively) have such a TMD0 while “short” human MRPs like ABCC4, 5, 11 and 12 do not (MRP4, 5, 8 and 9, respectively) [71]. In addition to MRPs, the ABCC family also harbors the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR, humanABCC7) and sulfonylurea receptors (humanABCC8/SUR1 and ABCC9/SUR2) [1].In our phylogenetic analysis, 23 T. urticaeABCCs clustered with D. melanogasterCG6214, D. pulex Dappu1-347281 and a group of human “long” MRPs (MRP1, 2, 3 and 6) (Figure 3). Twenty-two of the transporters (size ranging from 1481 to 1529 amino acids) from this T. urticaeABCC clade also have a TMD0, while we could not identify this additional transmembrane domain in tetur28g01950 (1287 amino acids) (Table 1), Additional file 3). Within this T. urticaeABCC clade, transporters clustered into 2 distinct groups. One group (“group 1”) consists of 8 T. urticaeABCC genes, each with 7 introns, and tetur04g04360, which has only 4 introns (see Additional file 3). Interestingly, tetur04g04360 is positioned at the basal node, indicating that intron gain events may have occurred in this group (Figure 3). The other group (“group 2”) consists of 14 T. urticaeABCC genes: 12 with 10 introns, tetur25g01780 with 11 introns and tetur28g01950 having only 6 introns (Additional file 3). The intron loss in tetur28g01950 can be directly linked to the lack of the TMD0 (see above, Additional file 3), while the nature of the intron gain event in tetur25g01780 is unclear (the extra intron contains stop codons in each frame, and is located in a non conserved region). HumanMRP1, MRP2, MRP3 and MRP6 along with D. melanogasterCG6214 and D. pulex Dappu1-347281 form a sister clade of T. urticaeABCC groups 1 and 2 (Figure 3). These proteins have been extensively studied as transporters of natural product drugs like anthracyclines and plant alkaloids [72]. MRPs also share many substrates with humanP-gps (see above) but, while P-gps transport drugs in their original form, MRPs mostly transport their glucuronate, sulfate and glutathione (GSH) conjugates. In the latter case, GSH is fused by GSTs with xenobiotics or their metabolites and finally transported out of the cell by MRPs [46,72,73]. In humans, GSTs from the alpha, mu and pi-class have been reported to act in synergy with MRPs [74]. Intriguingly, a clear expansion of GSTs in the T. urticae genome was found for the delta and mu GST subclasses, the latter of which is not present in insects and until recently was believed to be vertebrate specific [37,75]. Future studies should point out if there is a coordinated action between the GSTs of these subfamilies and the many MRP orthologues of T. urticae.
Figure 3
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCC proteins of five metazoan species.
See the legend of Figure 2 for procedure and display details.
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCC proteins of five metazoan species.See the legend of Figure 2 for procedure and display details.Most of the biochemical properties of humanMRP1 have been confirmed in its D. melanogaster orthologue CG6214 [76,77]. Recently, it was also found that exposure to the P450 mono-oxygenase inhibitor piperonylbutoxide and the antimetabolite/antifolate drug methotrexate alters the expression (27-fold and 1100-fold upregulation, respectively) of the D. melanogasterCG6214 gene in the Malpighian tubuli, which are organs known to play important roles in excretion and xenobiotic detoxification [78,79]. The orthologue (PhABCC4) of CG6214 in the human body louse, Pediculus humanus, has also been reported to be upregulated after exposure to the pesticide ivermectin. Moreover, injection of PhABCC4 dsRNA in P. humanus female lice increased their sensitivity to ivermectin by 20-30% [60].Fourteen spider mite ABCCs clustered with high bootstrap support in a group with 11 D. melanogasterABCC proteins, humanABCC4/MRP4 and ABCC7 and D. pulex Dappu1-347288 (Figure 3). All fourteen T. urticaeABCCs show the structural properties of “short” MRPs (see above, Table 1), Additional file 3). Five of these T. urticaeABCCs group as a sister clade (“group 3”) of the 11 D. melanogasterABCC proteins (Figure 3). Detailed physiological roles for most of the 11 D. melanogasterABCC proteins are unknown. D. melanogasterCG10505 is regulated by heavy metals through the metal-responsive transcription factor 1 (MTF-1) and contributes to metal homeostasis [80]. D. melanogasterCG14709 controls responsiveness to O2deprivation and might also be involved in oxidative stress response [81,82] while 31% of embryos of D. melanogasterCG7627 mutants were unable to heal wounds 16 h postwounding [83]. Recently, it was also shown that D. melanogasterCG4562, which is highly expressed in the midgut, was upregulated in Cyp6g1 knockdown flies, indicating molecular crosstalk within a detoxification network [84]. Furthermore, a point mutation in lepidopteran homologs of this D. melanogasterABCC group has been clearly linked with resistance against the B. thuringiensis Cry1A toxin [27,29]. Another 9 T. urticaeABCCs (“group 4”) form, together with D. pulex Dappu1-347288 and the 11 D. melanogaster and five T. urticaeABCCs (“group 3”, see above) a sister clade of humanABCC4 and ABCC7 (Figure 3). The function of D. pulex Dappu1-347288 is not known, but humanABCC7/CFTR acts as a chloride channel, a unique function not found in any other ABC transporter [69]. In our analysis, CFTR clustered with humanABCC4/MRP4, which is its closest ABC paralog according to Jordan et al. [69]. HumanMRP4 (and MRP5) have the ability to transport a range of endogenous molecules involved in cellular signaling, like cyclic nucleotides, eicosanoids and conjugated steroid hormones [19]. As a drug transporter, MRP4 also stands out for its broad substrate specificity, covering antiviral, antibiotic, cardiovascular and cytotoxic agents [85].Interestingly, many transporter genes in T. urticaeABCC groups 1–4 form closely related sister groups and show high amino acid identity between their corresponding protein sequences (see Additional file 5). Together with their conserved exon pattern (see Additional file 3), this strongly suggests that multiple tandem duplications underlie the proliferation of these genes. This is in contrast to the crustacean D. pulex, which has only few ABCC genes [11], and more closely resembles what is generally observed for insects, where gene duplication of ABCC genes occurs frequently [8,9,12].Furthermore, clear orthologous relationships were found for the two remaining T. urticaeABCCs: tetur03g07840 and tetur11g05990. Tetur03g07840 clustered as an orthologue of D. melanogasterCG7806, D. pulex Dappu1-347323 and humanABCC10/MRP7 (Figure 3). Similar to its orthologues, tetur03g07840 has a TMD0[11,86] (Table 1), Additional file 3). The functions of D. melanogasterCG7806 and D. pulex Dappu1-34723 are not known. A growing understanding of the physiological role of humanABCC10/MRP7 is, on the other hand, beginning to emerge. HumanMRP7 is distinct from other humanABCCs in that it shows little or no activity towards glutathione, sulfate conjugates and cyclic nucleotides, substrates that can be handled by other human MRPs (see above). Instead, humanMRP7 is able to confer resistance to taxanes (which are diterpenes originally derived from plants of the genus Taxus and widely used as chemotherapy agents (e.g. docetaxel)) [86]. However, the presence of one-to-one orthologues in other metazoans, might indicate a more conserved function of this ABCC protein in this group of species.Tetur11g05990 is located in the same clade as D. pulex, human and D. melanogastersulfonylurea receptors (SURs). In contrast to vertebrates, the N-terminal SUR Interpro-motif (IPR000388) is not present in tetur11g05990 and other arthropod SURs (see OrthoDb group EOG531ZCW, [87]). However, the presence of a TMD0 typical for SURs and “long” MRPs [71], and the well-supported clustering with humanABCC8/SUR1 and ABCC9/SUR2 support the idea that tetur11g05990 is a SUR homologue. Four SUR subunits assemble into an octameric complex with four pore-forming subunits, characteristic for inwardly rectifying potassium (Kir) channels, to form ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels [68]. Three orthologues of these pore- forming subunits were also found in the T. urticae genome (tetur17g01380, tetur24g01270 and tetur24g01280 having a BLASTx E-value of 1e-99, 4e-103 and 3e-103 with Ir (CG44159) of D. melanogaster), suggesting that a functional KATP channel can be formed in T. urticae. KATP channels are involved in multiple physiological processes, with roles in glucose homeostasis, ischemic protection and innate immunity [68,88]. Intriguingly, in 2004 it was suggested that the SUR was the direct target of benzoylureas, a group of chitin synthesis inhibitors [89]. This was largely based on similar effects of glibenclamide, a well-known SUR inhibitor in humans and anti-diabetic drug, on the inhibition of chitin synthesis. However, it was later shown by Gangishetti et al. [90] that SUR is not expressed in the D. melanogaster epidermis, where chitin disruption is observed. Recently, based on genetic mapping of etoxazole resistance genes, it was suggested that the action of chitin synthesis inhibitors is mediated by a direct interaction with chitin synthase, a processive glycosyl transferase [43]. The lack of a role for SUR in chitin production, transport or metabolism is further confirmed by recent studies, where it was shown that the SUR receptor is dispensable for chitin synthesis in D. melanogaster[91], and RNAi knockdown of its orthologue in T. castaneum did not result into a phenotype [8]. Elucidating the role of SUR in T. urticae will therefore require additional studies.Finally, no orthologues of humanABCC5, 11 and 12 were identified in T. urticae, although three orthologues were found in the genome of D. pulex (Figure 3), confirming earlier findings by Sturm et al. [11]. Surprisingly, a single nucleotide polymorphism in humanABCC11 was identified as the determinant of the human earwax type [92]. However, the potential roles of related transporters in other organisms (such as D. pulex) are not clear.The ABCD subfamily harbors HTs that in humans are located in the peroxisome where they are involved in the import of long and branched chain acyl-coA into this organelle [93]. The T. urticae genome has 2 ABCD genes, tetur05g06640 and tetur35g01360 (Table 1). This number of ABCD genes equals those found in insects [9] while 3, 4 and 5 are found in the genomes of D. pulex, H. sapiens and C. elegans, respectively (Table 1). T. urticae ABCDs carry the EAA-like motif between TM4 and TM5 and the loop1 motif (L105, R108 and T109 (S. cerevisiae numbering)), both considered to be essential for canonical ABCD function [94]. The clear orthologous relationships we identified between T. urticae ABCDs and other metazoan ABCDs (Additional file 6) suggests that the function of T. urticae ABCDs is likely to be conserved with those in other metazoans.The ABCE and F proteins are characterized by two linked NBDs, but lack TMDs and thus are involved in biological processes other than transport. The ABCE protein is essential in all eukaryotes examined to date and is one of the most conserved proteins known [95]. HumanABCE1 was first discovered as an inhibitor of RNase L [96], but was later found to have a more fundamental role in ribosome biogenesis and translation regulation [95]. In line with all eukaryotes to date, we found one ABCE protein (tetur30g01400) in T. urticae (Table 1) and Table 2) that has high amino acid identity (77.1%) with D. melanogasterABCE1 (pixie) (Additional file 5). Similar to humanABCE, ABCF1 is involved in translation regulation, but probably does not play a role in ribosome biogenesis [97]. In most eukaryotes 3 ABCF genes are found, and T. urticae conforms to this expectation (Liu et al. [9], Table 1) and Table 2). The essential role of ABCE and ABCF genes was recently shown in the flour beetle, T. castaneum, where RNAi–mediated knockdown of members of the ABCE and F families resulted in 100% mortality in penultimate larvae [8].A phylogenetic analysis of ABCE and ABCF proteins was performed together (Additional file 7). Tetur30g01400 grouped with metazoan ABCE1 orthologues, while each T. urticaeABCF (tetur20g02610, tetur29g00620 and tetur32g00940) clustered into well-supported separate clades with its metazoan orthologues, C. elegans F42A10.1 excluded (Additional file 7). The ABCE and ABCF subfamilies are highly conserved, and T. urticaeABCE1 and ABCFs probably have analogous roles as their orthologues in other metazoans.The ABCG transporter family is present in most metazoan species, fungi and plants such as Arabidopsis. For metazoan species, only ABCG HTs have been reported to date, while in plants and fungi also ABCG FTs are present [1,15,47]. In humans, ABCG HTs are primarily implicated in transport of endogenous and dietary lipids, while the humanABCG2 functions as a multidrug efflux pump [18,98]. Within the T. urticae genome we identified 23 ABCGs, all having a typical reverse domain organization (the NBD is localized to the N-terminal side of the TMD) (Table 1), see Additional file 3). A similar number of ABCGs has also been found in D. pulex, and is the highest reported among metazoan species [11] (Table 2). According to Sturm et al. [11], the high number of ABCG genes in D. pulex and D. melanogaster genomes is due to extensive lineage specific duplications. Our phylogenetic analysis confirms this hypothesis not only for these two arthropod species but also for T. urticae, with twenty out of 23 ABCGs grouping into one of the two T. urticae specific clades (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCG proteins of five metazoan species.
See the legend of Figure 2 for procedure and display details.
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCG proteins of five metazoan species.See the legend of Figure 2 for procedure and display details.One clade (bottom of tree, Figure 4) consists of 11 T. urticaeABCGs, each having a maximum of 1 intron (see Additional file 3). Another T. urticae specific ABCG clade comprises 9 transporters of which 7 are located next to each other on scaffold 9. These seven ABCGs show high amino acid identity (between 50.8 and 91.7%) and have a conserved exon pattern (9 exons), indicating a common origin by successive tandem duplication events. Together with tetur06g05430 and tetur02g11270 they form a well-supported sister clade of D. melanogaster white and its D. pulex orthologues. Interestingly, no orthologues of D. melanogasterABCGs brown and scarlet were found in T. urticae, while only one D. pulex orthologue of scarlet could be identified (Figure 4, [11]). About a century ago, the discovery of D. melanogaster white mutants with a remarkable eye-color phenotype marked the beginning of Drosophila genetics. As a consequence, D. melanogaster white is one of the most intensively studied fruit fly genes [99]. D. melanogaster white dimerises with either D. melanogaster scarlet or brown to form a transporter involved in the uptake of pigment precursors (guanine and tryptophan) in cells of developing compound and simple eyes [22]. T. urticae has, in contrast to D. pulex and D. melanogaster, no compound eyes and only four simple eyes (ocelli) [100]. Although no T. urticae orthologues of scarlet or brown were identified, dimerisation between the nine T. urticae co-orthologues of D. melanogaster white might result in a transporter capable of translocating pigment precursors into the cells of the spider mite ocelli (which have red pigment, as in D. melanogaster). However, these transporters might also have other functions besides transporting pigment precursors, as in other species roles have been documented in courtship behavior [101,102], transport of biogenic amines [103] and uptake of uric acid [104] as was shown for D. melanogaster white and/or its B. mori orthologue.In the middle of the ABCG phylogenetic tree, tetur01g16280 clustered with humanABCG8, D. melanogasterCG31121 and D. pulex Dappu1-258299, while tetur01g16290 clustered with humanABCG5, D. melanogasterCG11069, and D. pulex Dappu1-300887. C. elegans orthologues of humanABCG5/8 could not be identified (Figure 4). Similar to humanABCG5/8, D. melanogasterCG31121/CG11069[105] and D. pulex Dappu1-258299/Dappu1-300887[106], tetur01g16280 and tetur01g16290 are found juxtaposed in a head to head orientation. Annilo et al. [7] have suggested an evolutionary constraint on the separation of these genes, probably for the maintenance of shared regulatory regions. In humans, ABCG5 and ABCG8 are both glycoproteins and obligate heterodimers that limit intestinal absorption and promote biliary excretion of neutral sterols [107]. Both tetur01g16280 and tetur01g16290 have at least one well-predicted glycosylation site (Table 1). Together with their head-to-head arrangement and the well-supported clustering with humanABCG8 and 5, it seems likely that these T. urticaeABCGs have similar functions as their human counterparts.A clear orthologous relationship was found between tetur17g02510, D. melanogasterCG3327 and D. pulex Dappu1-347416. D. melanogasterCG3327, also known as E23 (Early gene at 23), is a 20-OH ecdysone (20E) induced ABC transporter that is capable of regulating 20E responses during metamorphosis, probably by removing 20E from cells [108]. Recently, Broehan et al. [8] showed through RNAi-mediated knockdown experiments and expression profiling that the T. castaneum orthologue of E23 (TcABCG-8A) appears to serve a similar function in metamorphosis. In addition, it is also believed that E23 controls the circadian clock in adult flies through ecdysone-mediated expression of the clock gene vrille[109]. Interestingly, it was shown that not only the B. mori orthologue of E23 (BmABC010557) but also four other midgut-specific B. moriABCG genes (BmABC005226, BmABC005203, BmABC005202 and BmABC010555) could be induced by 20E [9]. As T. urticae uses a different molting hormone (ponasterone A instead of 20E) compared to arthropods [37], future experiments are required to establish if tetur17g02510 has a similar function as its insect counterparts, and more specifically whether it can be induced by ponasterone A.T. urticae orthologues of humanABCG1 and 4 were not identified in the phylogenetic analysis of ABCG transporters, and only one was found in D. melanogaster (Atet) and D. pulex (Dappu1-34744) (Figure 4). The function of humanABCG4 is not well understood, while it is proposed that humanABCG1 functions in conjunction with humanABCA1 and is involved in cholesterol homeostasis [18,98]. The D. melanogaster orthologue of humanABCG1 (Atet) has been poorly characterized, but is expressed in the trachea [110]. Finally, no clear orthologues of humanABCG2 were identified (Figure 4). This transporter is the most thoroughly characterized humanABCG and is capable of transporting an array of substrates, including anticancer drugs [18,19,98]. Because of this feature, it has been proposed that arthropod ABCGs could be involved in pesticide resistance [14]. However, to the best of our knowledge there has only been two studies that correlated increased arthropod ABCG expression levels with resistance. In both reports, however, no functional evidence was obtained [13,111]. In Fungi on the other hand, several cases of ABCG FTs involved in fungicide resistance, have been reported [112].The ABCH subfamily was first discovered in D. melanogaster and is lacking in mammals, plants or fungi [1,15,47]. In addition to arthropods ([1,8,9,11], this study), members of this subfamily have also been reported in teleost fish [6,7,10]. Most insects have only 3 ABCH genes, while 15 and 22 are present in D. pulex and T. urticae, respectively ([9,13], Table 2). Liu et al. [9] suggested that all insect ABCHs diversified from a common ancestral copy. According to our phylogenetic analysis, this insect ancestor seems not to be shared with T. urticae ABCH proteins (Figure 5). TetranychusABCHs clustered, similar to D. pulexABCHs (see also [11]), into a distinct clade, indicating that the diversity of the ABCH family in T. urticae has been due to lineage specific duplications. Interestingly, 16 of the 22 T. urticaeABCHs appear to be intronless (Additional file 3). Although ABCHs have the same structural organization as metazoan ABCGs (HTs, NBD at N-terminal side of TMD), their physiological functions have remained enigmatic. In the zebrafish, D. rerio, ABCH1 has highest expression in brain, gills and kidney followed by lower expression in intestine, gonads, skeletal muscle and liver [10]. D. melanogasterABCHs are enriched in the adult crop and hindgut [113] and at least one of them (CG9990) is glycosylated as shown by mass spectrometry of N-glycosylated peptides [52]. An RNAi screen of D. melanogaster genes revealed that an RNAi line that silences CG9990 is lethal [114,115]. In addition, microarray analysis demonstrated an almost two-fold upregulation of a D. melanogasterABCH (CG33970) after cold hardening of adult fruit flies [116]. In the diamondback mothPlutella xylostella, it was recently found that an ABCH transporter (Px014955, [117]) was the most up-regulated ABC gene in two resistant strains [13]. The most groundbreaking finding about insect ABCH function was just recently reported by the excellent study of Broehan et al. [8]. RNAi-mediated knockdown of an ABCH gene (TcABCH-9C) in T. castaneum larvae resulted in dessication and 100% mortality. Injection of TcABCH-9C dsRNA into adults also drastically reduced the number of eggs laid and all eggs failed to hatch. Furthermore, cryosections of TcABCH-9C dsRNA injected larvae stained with Nile Red (a fluorescent dye that stains lipids) revealed a lack of lipids in the epicuticle. Based on these results, the authors suggested that TcABCH-9C functions as a transporter of lipids to the cuticle and is required for the formation of a waterproof barrier in the epicuticle.
Figure 5
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCH proteins of five metazoan species.
See the legend of Figure 2 for procedure and display details.
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCH proteins of five metazoan species.See the legend of Figure 2 for procedure and display details.
Expression profiling of ABC genes
We assessed expression of ABC genes across development in the T. urticae London reference strain, as well as in London after transfer from a benign host (bean, Phaseolus vulgaris) to two more challenging hosts (Arabidopsis thaliana and tomato, Solanum lycopersicum; [37]). For the developmental and host transfer experiments, we used existing RNA-seq reads, but we recalculated gene expression using newly described or corrected ABC gene models curated as part of this study. We further examined previously published microarray data to assess the expression profiles of ABC genes in two spider mite strains, MR-VP and MAR-AB, that are resistant to multiple pesticides [42].As assessed by RNA-seq expression quantification, the majority of ABC genes were found to be expressed – 88 of the 103 full length T. urticaeABC genes had an RPKM of >1 in at least one of the spider mite life stages or on one of the plant hosts (Figure 6). In contrast, nearly all T. urticaeABC fragments or pseudogenes were not expressed (Additional file 8). Most full-length T. urticaeABC genes for which we detected no expression across development or on different hosts belonged to either ABCA, C or G subfamilies, many of which are tandem duplicated genes ((Table 1), Figure 6). In C. elegans, tandem duplicated genes were shown to be subfunctionalized, with strong stage or tissue dependent expression [118]. Whether T. urticaeABC genes that lacked expression support in the existing data are expressed at low levels, in highly restricted expression domains, or alternatively are expressed under specific environmental conditions (i.e., host plants not included in this analysis), remains to be determined.
Figure 6
Heat map of expression values (RPKM values) of 103 . ABC genes of mites on different host plants (bean, tomato and and from four different life stages (embryo, larvae, nymph and adult). A color legend with corresponding RPKM values is shown at the top of the figure. ABC genes were considered as being expressed when they had an RPKM of >1 in at least one of the spider mite life stages or on one of the plant hosts.
Heat map of expression values (RPKM values) of 103 . ABC genes of mites on different host plants (bean, tomato and and from four different life stages (embryo, larvae, nymph and adult). A color legend with corresponding RPKM values is shown at the top of the figure. ABC genes were considered as being expressed when they had an RPKM of >1 in at least one of the spider mite life stages or on one of the plant hosts.Many T. urticaeABC genes were broadly expressed, and more than half (57 genes, or 55% of the total) were expressed across all developmental stages analyzed (embryos, larvae, nymphs, and adults). However, the expression of many ABCC and ABCH genes was restricted (or at their highest levels) in larvae and nymphs; overall, embryos and adult females had the highest number of non-expressed ABCs (40 and 36 ABC genes in the adult and embryos, respectively (Figure 6)). Furthermore, tetur30g01400 and tetur20g02610, members of the ABCE and ABCF subfamilies respectively, showed very high expression in all stages (Figure 6), coinciding with their presumed conserved role in translation regulation (see above). Similar high expression of the T. castaneumABCE gene was reported in all developmental stages examined [8]. Finally, within the other ABC subfamilies, tetur27g01890 (ABCA), tetur11g04030 (ABCB), tetur04g04360 (ABCC), tetur05g06640 (ABCD), tetur02g11270 (ABCG) and tetur28g00870 (ABCH) had the highest average expression across developmental stages (Figure 6).Upon host transfer, 22 and 28 ABC genes were differentially expressed in strain London mites transferred from bean to Arabidopsis and tomato plants, respectively (Figure 7; fold change ≥ 2, FDR < 0.05 as calculated for all T. urticae genes, see Methods). We found that 73% (16/22) of the differentially expressed ABC genes in mites transferred to Arabidopsis were also differentially expressed on tomato, and belonged to three subfamilies, ABCC (4), -G (5) and -H (7). Surprisingly, ABC genes differentially expressed in two multi-pesticide resistant T. urticae strains as detected with expression microarrays [42] belonged to the same ABC subfamilies as identified with RNA-seq data in the host transfer experiment (Table 3). The ABCC subfamily has been frequently linked with xenobiotic detoxification in arthropods (see above). On the other hand, arthropod members of the ABCG and H subfamilies have only very recently been reported to be associated with detoxification of xenobiotic compounds (see discussions for the ABCG and ABCH families). The differential expression of members from these ABC subfamilies (G and H) upon host transfer/exposure to xenobiotics should be further (functionally) validated in future studies.
Figure 7
Full length differentially expressed (fold change ≥ 2, FDR adjusted p-value <0.05) ABC genes in mites after host plant change from bean to either or tomato. Subfamilies are color-coded as follows: ABCA, red; ABCB, yellow; ABCC, green; ABCE, blue; ABCG, purple; and ABCH, brown. Genes found to be significant in only one of the pairwise comparisons have had their fold change values assigned to zero for the non-significant comparison. Fold change values of differentially expressed ABC genes can be found in Additional file 13.
Table 3
Fold changes of full length differentially expressed ABC genes of two multi-resistant strains (MR-VP and MAR-AB) compared to a susceptible strain (London)
Tetur ID
Name
MAR-AB
MR-VP
tetur01g10390
TuABCC-02
2.87
tetur03g07460
TuABCC-07
2.03
tetur03g07490
TuABCC-08
2.03
tetur03g09800
TuABCC-10
2.13
tetur03g09880
TuABCC-11
2.04
tetur04g05540
TuABCC-13
−2.29
tetur05g04300
TuABCC-17
2.45
tetur40g00010
TuABCC-39
2.00
tetur18g00230
TuABCH-13
2.21
tetur21g00940
TuABCH-15
2.19
Full length differentially expressed (fold change ≥ 2, FDR adjusted p-value <0.05) ABC genes in mites after host plant change from bean to either or tomato. Subfamilies are color-coded as follows: ABCA, red; ABCB, yellow; ABCC, green; ABCE, blue; ABCG, purple; and ABCH, brown. Genes found to be significant in only one of the pairwise comparisons have had their fold change values assigned to zero for the non-significant comparison. Fold change values of differentially expressed ABC genes can be found in Additional file 13.Fold changes of full length differentially expressed ABC genes of two multi-resistant strains (MR-VP and MAR-AB) compared to a susceptible strain (London)It is worth noting that the differentially expressed T. urticaeABCC, -G and -H genes mentioned above were not among the most highly differentially expressed genes in these experiments, both in expression level and fold change. In total, 893 and 977 differentially expressed genes were identified in the two multi-resistant strains [42]. Likewise, 2,502 and 3,951 differentially expressed genes were detected in mites when fed on Arabidopsis and tomato in comparison with bean, respectively [37]. The Major Facilitator Superfamily, another large and widespread transporter family [5], showed overall a more pronounced response both in the number of genes differentially expressed, and in the fold change values of differentially expressed genes in both resistant strains and after host plant change [37,42]. Thus, despite the exceptional number of ABC transporters in the T. urticae genome, other transporters and non-transporter proteins also play key roles in the detoxification of xenobiotics [37,42].
Conclusions
The spider mite T. urticae is among the most polyphagous pests worldwide and is notorious for its ability to develop resistance against numerous pesticides. One of the prerequisites to study xenobiotic metabolism (pesticides and plant secondary metabolites) in this species is to inventory genes related to detoxification. Here, we provide a survey of the ABC gene superfamily, whose members have frequently been reported to play roles in detoxification, either by directly transporting toxicants out of cells, or after conjugation with glutathione. We identified 103 ABC genes (distributed over eight subfamilies, ABCA-H) in the genome of the spider mite T. urticae. To date, this is the largest number of ABC genes reported in any metazoan species. The large number is mainly due to lineage-specific expansions in subfamilies C, G and H. Of particular note, most of the differentially expressed ABC genes in acaricide resistant strains and after introduction of mites to challenging host plants belong to these expanded ABC subfamilies. This hints at their potential role in detoxification and may explain their retention after duplication in the mite genome. However, obtaining functional evidence that members of these ABC subfamilies contribute to xenobiotic tolerance should be the priority of further research.Due to the lineage specific expansions in the ABCC, G, and H families, inferring the function of specific T. urticaeABC family members based on phylogenetic relationships is not straightforward. Nevertheless, we found clear orthologous relationships between some of the T. urticae ABC proteins and humanABCC10, ABCG5 and ABCG8, the D. melanogastersulfonylurea receptor and the ecdysone-regulated transporter E23. Furthermore, we found a high conservation between T. urticae ABC proteins and members of the ABCB-half transporters and ABCD, -E, and –F subfamilies, which are known to be involved in fundamental processes. To conclude, this study provides the first thorough ABC gene analysis of a polyphagous arthropod herbivore and represents a useful resource for future biochemical and toxicological studies on the role of ABC transporters in the extremely broad host range and development of pesticide resistance of T. urticae.
Methods
Annotation and phylogeny of ABC transporters
ABCs were identified in a similar way as for D. pulex[11]. Briefly, tBLASTn searches [119] were performed on the T. urticae genome sequence assembly (version July 2012, available at http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/orcae/overview/Tetur[120]) using the highly conserved nucleotide binding domain (NBD) of D. melanogasterABC proteins as queries. One search was carried out per subfamily, using the sequence of the NBD of a representative D. melanogaster protein (A: CG1718; B: CG3879 (Mdr49); C: CG9270; D: CG12703; E: CG5651; F: CG9330; G: white; H: CG9990). If the D. melanogaster transporter had two NBDs, the N-terminal domain was used. All hits with an E-value less than e-4 were withdrawn for analysis and gene models were refined or created on the basis of homology and RNA-seq support [120]. The NBDs from those T. urticae gene models encoding complete ABCs (i.e. not lacking one or both vital domains (TMD and NBD)) were extracted using the ScanProsite facility [121] and the Prosite profile PS50893. T. urticae ABC protein NBDs were aligned with NBDs of D. melanogaster and humanABC transporters using MUSCLE [122]. Model selection was done with Prottest 2.4 [123]. According to the Akaike information criterion LG+F+G was optimal for phylogenetic analysis (see Additional file 9 and Additional file 10 for protein alignment and likelihood scores, respectively). A maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis of T. urticae, D. melanogaster and humanABC protein NBDs, bootstrapping with 1000 pseudoreplicates, was performed using Treefinder [124] to confirm the position of T. urticaeABCs within ABC classes (A-G). A similar phylogenetic analysis, restricted to N-terminal NBDs of T. urticae, was also performed (optimal model according to the Akaike Information Criterion: LG+I+G+F, see Additional file 9 and Additional file 10 for protein alignment and likelihood score, respectively). Similar to previous studies, in the phylogenetic analysis using T. urticae, D. melanogaster and humanABC protein NBDs C-terminal NBDs of the ABCC subfamily clustered together with NBDs of the ABCB subfamily [9,45,125]. The subfamily assignment was further confirmed by BLASTp analyses of the manually corrected models on the NCBI website. We adopted the guidelines set forth by the human genome organization nomenclature committee (HGNC) for naming the T. urticae ABC proteins. Separate phylogenetic analyses on full ABC protein sequences of T. urticae, D. pulex, C. elegans, D. melanogaster and H. sapiensABCs were also carried out for each subfamily, using the same methodology as above (for ABC protein alignments see Additional file 9, for model choice and likelihood scores see Additional file 10). According to previous studies [7,11], this approach facilitates bioinformatics analyses and results in a more meaningful degree of resolution in phylogenetic analysis. Finally, in order to detect ABC pseudogenes/fragments not containing ABC NBDs, all protein sequences of complete ABCs were used as query in tBLASTn-searches against the T. urticae genome. Phylogenetic trees were visualized and edited using MEGA5 [126] and CorelDraw X3 (Corel Inc.), respectively.
Sequence similarity, transmembrane prediction and gene structure of T. urticae ABC proteins
ABC protein sequence similarities and identities were calculated using MatGAT 2.03 [127] using default settings (BLOSUM50 matrix, gap opening and extending gap penalty set to 12 and 2, respectively). Transmembrane domains of T. urticaeABCs were predicted using the SCAMPI prediction server [128]. Subcellular localization was predicted using TargetP 1.0 [129] . Gene structures of T. urticaeABCs were visualized using the coordinates of each T. urticaeABC transporter (available at [120]) and the fancyGene visualization software [130]. N-glycosylation sites were predicted with NetNGlyc1.0 server [131]. Only N-glycosylation sites with a “potential” score > 0.5 and with a jury agreement (“++”-sign or higher) were included in analyses. O-glycosylation sites were predicted using NetOGlyc 3.1 server [132]. If the G-score was higher than 0.5 the residue was considered to be O-glycosylated. The number of O-glycoslated sites (glycosylated serines and threonines) is shown in Table 1).Expression profiling of ABC genes was assessed using microarray expression data of two multi-pesticide resistant strains (MR-VP and MAR-AB) [42] and a previously published RNA-seq dataset [37]. The RNA-seq dataset consists of replicated RNA-seq libraries of spider mites feeding on different host plants (bean, tomato and Arabidopsis) and a single RNA-seq library for different developmental stages of spider mites (embryo, larvae, nymph and adult). Experimental details can be found in Grbić et al. [37] and the RNA-seq data are available via Gene Expression Omnibus under reference GSE32342. To ensure the best possible alignment of RNA-seq reads to our manually curated ABC transporter gene models, we re-mapped the RNA-seq reads to the spider mite genome with an updated annotation (Nov 15, 2012 release; [120]). Read alignments and expression quantification were performed after Grbić et al. [37]. For host transfer experiments, differential gene expression was assessed with the DESeq R package [133] as previously described [37]. For the microarray experiment, differentially expressed genes were assessed as reported earlier [42]. For both the host transfer experiment (RNA-seq) and expression profiling with multi-pesticide resistant strains (microarrays), ABC genes with a fold change higher than two and a FDR adjusted p-value less than 0.05 were considered as differentially expressed.
Abbreviations
ABC: ATP-binding cassette; FDR: False discovery rate; FT: Full transporter; GST: Glutathione S-transferase; HT: Half transporter; MDR: Multidrug resistance protein; MRP: Multidrug resistance associated protein; P-gp: P-glycoprotein; RPKM: Reads per kilobase per million mapped reads; SUR: Sulfonylurea receptor
Competing interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
WD and TVL designed research. WD and EJO analyzed data. WD and TVL wrote the manuscript, with input from RMC, EJO and LT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Additional file 1
Midpoint rooted maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of ABC NBDs of , and . For amino acid alignment, amino acid substitution model and likelihood score of the constructed phylogenetic tree see Additional file 9 and Additional file 10. Main nodes were collapsed to create a better overview of the phylogenetic relationships between the different ABC subfamilies. Numbers at the branch point of each node represent the bootstrap value resulting from 1000 pseudoreplicates (LR-ELW). The scale bar represents 0.5 amino-acid substitutions per site. For accession numbers of metazoan ABC protein sequences see Additional file 11 while T. urticaeABC protein sequences can be found in Additional file 12.Click here for file
Additional file 2
ABC fragments.Click here for file
Additional file 3
Exon-intron pattern of 103 ABC genes. Exons are depicted as light grey boxes while strandlines represent introns. Within exons red boxes represent NBDs, while small dark grey boxes represent transmembrane helices (TM). Solid arrows indicate direction of transcription.Click here for file
Additional file 4
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCA proteins of five metazoan species, derived according to the procedure in the Figure
2
legend.Click here for file
Additional file 5
Identity/similarity matrices between and ABC proteins. In the upper triangle identity values are shown, while in the lower triangle similarity values are presented.Click here for file
Additional file 6
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCD proteins of five metazoan species, derived according to the procedure in the Figure
2
legend.Click here for file
Additional file 7
Phylogenetic analysis of ABCE and ABCF proteins of five metazoan species, derived according to the procedure in the Figure
2
legend.Click here for file
Additional file 8
Heat plot of mean expression values (rpkm) of
ABC fragments from mites on different host plants (bean, tomato and
) and of expression values of
ABC fragments from four different life stages (embryo, larvae, nymph and adult).Click here for file
Additional file 9
Alignment of N-terminal NBDs of ABC proteins (ABC_N-term_NBD_Tetranychus.fas), N- and C-terminal NBDs of metazoan ABC proteins (ABC_NBD_Metazoa_simple.fas) and of full length metazoan ABCA, -B, C, D, E, F, G and H protein sequences (ABCA-H.fas) (bundled in a .rar file) (examination of the files in this .rar file requires the BioEdit program (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html)).Click here for file
Additional file 10
Amino acid substitution models used for maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses and likelihood scores of constructed phylogenetic trees.Click here for file
Additional file 11
Accession numbers of sequences used for phylogenetic analysis.Click here for file
Additional file 12
103 ABC protein sequences (.fasta) (examination of this file requires the BioEdit program (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html)).Click here for file
Additional file 13
Fold change values of differentially expressed ABC genes of mites after host plant change to either
or tomato.Click here for file
Authors: Sheetal Shah; Carol Yarrow; Rebecca Dunning; Ben Cheek; Simon Vass; John Windass; Stephen Hadfield Journal: Pest Manag Sci Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 4.845
Authors: Isabel Campos; Jennifer A Geiger; Ana Catarina Santos; Vanessa Carlos; Antonio Jacinto Journal: Genetics Date: 2009-11-02 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Anne Lespine; Cécile Ménez; Catherine Bourguinat; Roger K Prichard Journal: Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Peter T Nelson; Gregory A Jicha; Wang-Xia Wang; Eseosa Ighodaro; Sergey Artiushin; Colin G Nichols; David W Fardo Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: M R Kant; W Jonckheere; B Knegt; F Lemos; J Liu; B C J Schimmel; C A Villarroel; L M S Ataide; W Dermauw; J J Glas; M Egas; A Janssen; T Van Leeuwen; R C Schuurink; M W Sabelis; J M Alba Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Dorith Rotenberg; Aaron A Baumann; Sulley Ben-Mahmoud; Olivier Christiaens; Wannes Dermauw; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Chris G C Jacobs; Iris M Vargas Jentzsch; Jonathan E Oliver; Monica F Poelchau; Swapna Priya Rajarapu; Derek J Schneweis; Simon Snoeck; Clauvis N T Taning; Dong Wei; Shirani M K Widana Gamage; Daniel S T Hughes; Shwetha C Murali; Samuel T Bailey; Nicolas E Bejerman; Christopher J Holmes; Emily C Jennings; Andrew J Rosendale; Andrew Rosselot; Kaylee Hervey; Brandi A Schneweis; Sammy Cheng; Christopher Childers; Felipe A Simão; Ralf G Dietzgen; Hsu Chao; Huyen Dinh; Harsha Vardhan Doddapaneni; Shannon Dugan; Yi Han; Sandra L Lee; Donna M Muzny; Jiaxin Qu; Kim C Worley; Joshua B Benoit; Markus Friedrich; Jeffery W Jones; Kristen A Panfilio; Yoonseong Park; Hugh M Robertson; Guy Smagghe; Diane E Ullman; Maurijn van der Zee; Thomas Van Leeuwen; Jan A Veenstra; Robert M Waterhouse; Matthew T Weirauch; John H Werren; Anna E Whitfield; Evgeny M Zdobnov; Richard A Gibbs; Stephen Richards Journal: BMC Biol Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 7.431
Authors: Wim Jonckheere; Wannes Dermauw; Vladimir Zhurov; Nicky Wybouw; Jan Van den Bulcke; Carlos A Villarroel; Robert Greenhalgh; Mike Grbić; Rob C Schuurink; Luc Tirry; Geert Baggerman; Richard M Clark; Merijn R Kant; Bartel Vanholme; Gerben Menschaert; Thomas Van Leeuwen Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Caleb R Schlachter; Leily Daneshian; Jose Amaya; Vincent Klapper; Nicky Wybouw; Tomasz Borowski; Thomas Van Leeuwen; Vojislava Grbic; Miodrag Grbic; Thomas M Makris; Maksymilian Chruszcz Journal: Insect Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 4.714
Authors: Robert Greenhalgh; Wannes Dermauw; Joris J Glas; Stephane Rombauts; Nicky Wybouw; Jainy Thomas; Juan M Alba; Ellen J Pritham; Saioa Legarrea; René Feyereisen; Yves Van de Peer; Thomas Van Leeuwen; Richard M Clark; Merijn R Kant Journal: Elife Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 8.140