Literature DB >> 23662966

Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different?

Ian G Morgan1, Regan S Ashby, Debora L Nickla.   

Abstract

In the following point-counterpoint article, internationally-acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer-reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point-Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics
© 2013 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23662966      PMCID: PMC3745013          DOI: 10.1111/opo.12059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  25 in total

1.  Light- and focus-dependent expression of the transcription factor ZENK in the chick retina.

Authors:  A J Fischer; J J McGuire; F Schaeffel; W K Stell
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Differences in time course and visual requirements of ocular responses to lenses and diffusers.

Authors:  C S Kee; D Marzani; J Wallman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Effects of interchanging hyperopic defocus and form deprivation stimuli in normal and optic nerve-sectioned chicks.

Authors:  Vivian Choh; MinJung Y Lew; Michel W Nadel; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  An updated view on the role of dopamine in myopia.

Authors:  Marita Feldkaemper; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Retinal function with lens-induced myopia compared with form-deprivation myopia in chicks.

Authors:  T Fujikado; Y Kawasaki; A Suzuki; G Ohmi; Y Tano
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Retinal dopamine and form-deprivation myopia.

Authors:  R A Stone; T Lin; A M Laties; P M Iuvone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dopaminergic behaviour in chicken retina and the effect of form deprivation.

Authors:  P L Megaw; I G Morgan; M K Boelen
Journal:  Aust N Z J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-05

8.  Retinal dopamine and lens-induced refractive errors in chicks.

Authors:  S S Guo; J G Sivak; M G Callender; B Diehl-Jones
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.424

Review 9.  Review: avian models for experimental myopia.

Authors:  J K Lauber
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol       Date:  1991

10.  Constant light affects retinal dopamine levels and blocks deprivation myopia but not lens-induced refractive errors in chickens.

Authors:  M Bartmann; F Schaeffel; G Hagel; E Zrenner
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  20 in total

1.  The Muscarinic Antagonist MT3 Distinguishes Between Form Deprivation- and Negative Lens-Induced Myopia in Chicks.

Authors:  Debora L Nickla; Yekaterina Yusupova; Kristen Totonelly
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.424

2.  Comparison of form-deprived myopia and lens-induced myopia in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Hui Xiao; Zhong-Yi Fan; Xiao-Dan Tian; Yan-Chun Xu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Differential gene expression of BMP2 and BMP receptors in chick retina & choroid induced by imposed optical defocus.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yue Liu; Abraham Hang; Eileen Phan; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Scleral ultrastructure and biomechanical changes in rabbits after negative lens application.

Authors:  Xiao Lin; Bing-Jie Wang; Yen-Chiao Wang; Ren-Yuan Chu; Jin-Hui Dai; Xing-Tao Zhou; Xiao-Mei Qu; Hong Liu; Hao Zhou
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  The effect of intravitreal injection of vehicle solutions on form deprivation myopia in tree shrews.

Authors:  Alexander H Ward; John T Siegwart; Michael R Frost; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Gene expression signatures in tree shrew choroid in response to three myopiagenic conditions.

Authors:  Li He; Michael R Frost; John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Intermittent episodes of bright light suppress myopia in the chicken more than continuous bright light.

Authors:  Weizhong Lan; Marita Feldkaemper; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Head-Mounted Spectacle Frame for the Study of Mouse Lens-Induced Myopia.

Authors:  Yangshun Gu; Baisheng Xu; Chunfei Feng; Yang Ni; Qin Wu; Chixin Du; Nan Hong; Peng Li; Zhihua Ding; Bo Jiang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Intravitreal brimonidine inhibits form-deprivation myopia in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Yifang Yang; Junshu Wu; Defu Wu; Qi Wei; Tan Zhong; Jun Yang; Xiaowei Yang; Meizhen Zeng; Xingwu Zhong
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-14

10.  Development of Experimental Myopia in Chicks in a Natural Environment.

Authors:  Richard A Stone; Yuval Cohen; Alice M McGlinn; Sherrill Davison; Susan Casavant; James Shaffer; Tejvir S Khurana; Machelle T Pardue; P Michael Iuvone
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.