Literature DB >> 16212999

Effects of interchanging hyperopic defocus and form deprivation stimuli in normal and optic nerve-sectioned chicks.

Vivian Choh1, MinJung Y Lew, Michel W Nadel, Christine F Wildsoet.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that the same mechanisms mediate form deprivation and lens-induced myopia, the ocular growth responses of chicks alternately exposed to lenses and diffusers at regular intervals (3h) were compared to those of chicks exposed to either negative lenses or diffusers alone. In total, there were four experiments: (1) -15 D lenses and/or diffusers on normal birds, (2) -15 D lenses and/or diffusers on optic nerve-sectioned (ONS) birds, (3) -5/-10/-15 D lenses (sequentially applied) and/or diffusers on normal birds and (4) -5/-10/-15 D lenses and/or diffusers on ONS birds. All treatments were monocular. In all experiments, optical axial lengths (cornea-to-retina distances) in treated eyes were greater than in fellow eyes, irrespective of the optical device (diffuser, lens or switch), lens power (fixed or incremented) and optic nerve condition (intact or severed). In normal chicks, optical axial length responses in the switch group were significantly reduced relative to those of the diffuser but not to those of the -15 D lens group. For both groups of ONS birds, diffusers exaggerated the optical axial length changes. For all groups, the responses to the switch and lens groups were most similar. These results together suggest that the mechanisms mediating form deprivation- and lens-induced myopia are different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16212999     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  The hyperopic effect of narrow-band long-wavelength light in tree shrews increases non-linearly with duration.

Authors:  Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton; Carrie E Huisingh; Timothy J Gawne
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visually-driven ocular growth in mice requires functional rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Han na Park; Seema B Jabbar; Christopher C Tan; Curran S Sidhu; Jane Abey; Fazila Aseem; Gregor Schmid; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Effects of imposed defocus of opposite sign on temporal gene expression patterns of BMP4 and BMP7 in chick RPE.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yue Liu; Carol Ho; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 5.  Light levels, refractive development, and myopia--a speculative review.

Authors:  Thomas T Norton; John T Siegwart
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  The significance of retinal image contrast and spatial frequency composition for eye growth modulation in young chicks.

Authors:  Nina Tran; Sara Chiu; Yibin Tian; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Effects of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) and poly(vinyl-pyrrolidone) hydrogel implants on myopic and normal chick sclera.

Authors:  James Su; Elena Iomdina; Elena Tarutta; Brian Ward; Jie Song; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different?

Authors:  Ian G Morgan; Regan S Ashby; Debora L Nickla
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  An epidemiological study of the risk factors associated with myopia in young adult men in Korea.

Authors:  Dong Cheol Lee; Se Youp Lee; Yu Cheol Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Strain-Dependent Differences in Sensitivity to Myopia-Inducing Stimuli in Guinea Pigs and Role of Choroid.

Authors:  Liqin Jiang; Mariana B Garcia; David Hammond; Dinasha Dahanayake; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.