Literature DB >> 8003448

Constant light affects retinal dopamine levels and blocks deprivation myopia but not lens-induced refractive errors in chickens.

M Bartmann1, F Schaeffel, G Hagel, E Zrenner.   

Abstract

Chickens were raised with either translucent occluders or lenses, both under normal light cycles (12-h light/12-h dark) and in constant light (CL). Under normal light cycles, eyes with occluders became very myopic, and eyes with lenses became either relatively hyperopic (positive lenses) or myopic (negative lenses). After the treatment, retinal dopamine (DA), DOPAC, and serotonin levels were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC-EC). A significant drop in daytime retinal DOPAC (-20%) was observed after 1 week of deprivation, and in both DOPAC (-40%) and DA (-30%) after 2 weeks of deprivation. No changes in retinal serotonin levels were found. Retinal DA or DOPAC content remained unchanged after 2 or 4 days of lens wearing even though the lenses had already exerted their maximal effect on axial eye growth. When the chickens were raised in CL, development of deprivation myopia was reduced (8 days CL) or entirely blocked (13 days CL). Lens-induced changes in eye growth were not different after either 6 or 11 days in CL, compared to animals raised in a normal light cycle. Thirteen days of CL resulted in a dramatic reduction of DA and DOPAC levels, but serotonin levels were also lowered. The results suggest that lens-induced changes in refraction may not be dependent on dopaminergic pathways whereas deprivation myopia requires normal diurnal DA rhythms to develop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8003448     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800001565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  39 in total

1.  Protective effects of high ambient lighting on the development of form-deprivation myopia in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Earl L Smith; Li-Fang Hung; Juan Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Constant light rearing disrupts compensation to imposed- but not induced-hyperopia and facilitates compensation to imposed myopia in chicks.

Authors:  Varuna Padmanabhan; Jennifer Shih; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Bidirectional, optical sign-dependent regulation of BMP2 gene expression in chick retinal pigment epithelium.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yue Liu; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Retinal function with lens-induced myopia compared with form-deprivation myopia in chicks.

Authors:  T Fujikado; Y Kawasaki; A Suzuki; G Ohmi; Y Tano
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Quantifying light exposure patterns in young adult students.

Authors:  Amanda A Alvarez; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  J Mod Opt       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.464

6.  Gene expression signatures in tree shrew sclera in response to three myopiagenic conditions.

Authors:  Lin Guo; Michael R Frost; Li He; John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Alterations in ZENK and glucagon RNA transcript expression during increased ocular growth in chickens.

Authors:  Regan Ashby; Peter Kozulin; Pam L Megaw; Ian G Morgan
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  Patching fellow eyes during subjective night does not prevent disruption to minus lens compensation in constant light-reared chicks.

Authors:  Varuna Padmanabhan; Jennifer Shih; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Pharmacology of myopia and potential role for intrinsic retinal circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Richard A Stone; Machelle T Pardue; P Michael Iuvone; Tejvir S Khurana
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Breed- and gender-dependent differences in eye growth and form deprivation responses in chick.

Authors:  K Schmid; C Wildsoet
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.