Literature DB >> 26204973

Three-Dimensional Anorectal Manometry Findings in Primigravida.

D P Wickramasinghe1, C S Perera2, H Senanayake3, D N Samarasekera4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vaginal delivery is an identified risk factor for anal sphincter injury. Therefore, to identify postpartum injury, an antepartum value or a normal range is required. However, at present, the normal values of 3D manometry are not available for primigravida or pregnant mothers. AIMS: Our study aims at describing normal values of 3D manometry in primigravida.
METHODS: We analyzed 3DARM data of 101 consecutive primigravid mothers in the third trimester. 3DARM was performed using the Given Imaging(®) ManoScan system.
RESULTS: The mean age was 24.7 (SD 5.1) years. All patients had a normal Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score. The mean resting pressure (RP) was 87.02 (SD 18.43) mmHg and the maximum squeeze pressure (SP) was 179.21 (SD 52.96) mmHg. The mean length of the high-pressure zone (HPZ) was 3.67 (SD 0.52) cm. Mean volumes for initial rectal sensation, urge, and discomfort were 50.36 (± 25.57), 76.70 (± 35.17), and 143.40 (± 66.26) ml, respectively. The pressure asymmetry was highest in the lower anal sphincter and lowest in the mid-sphincter. There was a statistically significant relationship between the HPZ and RP (Pearson ρ -0.23, p = 0.01), height (Pearson ρ 0.22, p = 0.028), and weight (Pearson ρ 0.25, p = 0.012). There were no statistically significant correlations between age, height, or weight with RP, SP, or balloon fill volumes. The characteristic appearance of the normal RP and SP was clearly visualized in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Normal 3DARM values for Sri Lankan primigravid mothers have been established. These may be used as reference values by other investigators.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pregnancy; Primigravida; Three-dimensional anorectal manometry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26204973     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3784-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  28 in total

1.  Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer.

Authors:  A C Lowry; C L Simmang; P Boulos; K C Farmer; P J Finan; N Hyman; M Killingback; D Z Lubowski; R Moore; C Penfold; P Savoca; R Stitz; J J Tjandra
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 2.  Minimum standards of anorectal manometry.

Authors:  S S C Rao; F Azpiroz; N Diamant; P Enck; G Tougas; A Wald
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  CONTRIBUTION OF THE EXTERNAL ANAL SPHINCTER TO THE PRESSURE ZONE IN THE ANAL CANAL.

Authors:  H L DUTHIE; J M WATTS
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1965-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Functional morphology of anal sphincter complex unveiled by high definition anal manometery and three dimensional ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  V Raizada; V Bhargava; A Karsten; R K Mittal
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Effect of aging on anorectal and pelvic floor functions in females.

Authors:  Jean C Fox; Joel G Fletcher; Alan R Zinsmeister; Barb Seide; Stephen J Riederer; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry.

Authors:  R C Arndorfer; J J Stef; W J Dodds; J H Linehan; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  Advances in diagnostic assessment of fecal incontinence and dyssynergic defecation.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Anorectal manometry: a new simplified technique.

Authors:  A R Vela; A J Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Manometry of the normal upper esophageal sphincter and its alterations in laryngectomy.

Authors:  R W Welch; K Luckmann; P M Ricks; S T Drake; G A Gates
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function.

Authors:  Emma V Carrington; S Mark Scott; Adil Bharucha; François Mion; Jose M Remes-Troche; Allison Malcolm; Henriette Heinrich; Mark Fox; Satish S Rao
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Redundancy in the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group Manometry Protocol: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Daphne Ang; Paul Vollebregt; Emma V Carrington; Charles H Knowles; S Mark Scott
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Duration taken for the anal sphincter pressures to stabilize prior to anorectal manometry.

Authors:  Dakshitha Praneeth Wickramasinghe; Umesh Jayarajah; Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-06-05

4.  3D high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients with perianal fistulas: comparison with 3D-anal ultrasound.

Authors:  Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; Maarten S Vlietstra; Paul F Vollebregt; Ingrid J M Han-Geurts; Vera Rempe-Sorm; Grietje J H Vander Mijnsbrugge; Charlotte B H Molenaar
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  The London Classification: Improving Characterization and Classification of Anorectal Function with Anorectal Manometry.

Authors:  S Mark Scott; Emma V Carrington
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-09-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.