Literature DB >> 3678952

Anal canal pressure profile: a reappraisal as determined by rapid pullthrough technique.

S M McHugh1, N E Diamant.   

Abstract

Previous station pull through techniques of anal canal pressure measurement have not truly represented the differences among individuals and between sexes in the length and pressure profile of the anal canal. Furthermore, the techniques commonly used in anal canal pressure determination have not been adequately compared or standardised. Therefore, a mechanised rapid pull through technique using an 8-lumen, 4-quadrant, continuously perfused catheter was evaluated and used to define the anal canal pressure profile. For measurement of the resting anal canal pressures, this technique was compared with the more usual station pull through technique in 12 subjects. There were no differences in resting pressure recorded by either technique with infusion rates ranging from 0.5 to 1.2 cc/min/orifice and over a range of catheter withdrawal rates of 0.19 to 0.48 cm/sec. Twenty two subjects (12 men/10 women) had their anal canal pressure profiles assessed using the rapid pull through technique. Anal canal length representing the mean of four axes differed between the sexes (p less than 0.005) and the difference was largely accounted for by a decrease in length of the anterior axis in women. A standardisation technique was used to account for between subject variation and for a more accurate between sex comparison of the pressure profiles. Significant differences in radial symmetry were found between the sexes. In the anterior axis the pressure was higher distally in women, while in the anterior and lateral axes the pressure was higher proximally in men. Anteriorly in women the highest pressures were exerted over a much shorter canal length than in men. We conclude that the usual station pull through technique can give reliable resting pressure measurements in the anal canal. The rapid pull through technique described herein, however, used a flexible catheter system which follows the normal anal canal and rectal contours, allows a more appropriate assessment of the anal sphincter profile, and provides findings that are consistent with the known local anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3678952      PMCID: PMC1433468          DOI: 10.1136/gut.28.10.1234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  8 in total

1.  CONTRIBUTION OF THE EXTERNAL ANAL SPHINCTER TO THE PRESSURE ZONE IN THE ANAL CANAL.

Authors:  H L DUTHIE; J M WATTS
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1965-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Measurement of anal pressure and motility.

Authors:  B D Hancock
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Anatomy of the external anal sphincter.

Authors:  C Oh; A E Kark
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Perfusion urethral profilometry.

Authors:  P H Abrams
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Force in the anal canal and anal continence.

Authors:  C D Collins; H L Duthie; T Shelley; G E Whittaker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Longitudinal and radial variations of pressure in the human anal sphincter.

Authors:  B M Taylor; R W Beart; S F Phillips
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Anal profilometry, a method of investigating the physiology of the anal canal and the pelvic floor.

Authors:  J Kielmann; T Bonnesen
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1985-03

8.  Functional evaluation of the rectal ampulla with ampullometrogram.

Authors:  M P Bubrick; C J Godec; A S Cass
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 18.000

  8 in total
  17 in total

Review 1.  Anal manometry.

Authors:  R J Felt-Bersma; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Functional morphology of anal sphincter complex unveiled by high definition anal manometery and three dimensional ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  V Raizada; V Bhargava; A Karsten; R K Mittal
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Investigating and treating fecal incontinence: when and how.

Authors:  Adriana Lazarescu; Geoffrey K Turnbull; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 4.  High resolution and high definition anorectal manometry and pressure topography: diagnostic advance or a new kid on the block?

Authors:  Yeong Yeh Lee; Askin Erdogan; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-12

5.  Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Manfred Nagelschmidt; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.

Authors:  P J Shorvon; S McHugh; N E Diamant; S Somers; G W Stevenson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Normal values and pressure morphology for three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry of asymptomatic adults: a study in 110 subjects.

Authors:  Yuwei Li; Xiaoqing Yang; Chen Xu; Yi Zhang; Xipeng Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Anorectal physiology: test and clinical application.

Authors:  Hyeon-Min Cho
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2010-10-31

9.  A Predictive Model to Identify Patients With Fecal Incontinence Based on High-Definition Anorectal Manometry.

Authors:  Ali Zifan; Melissa Ledgerwood-Lee; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  The role of pouch compliance measurement in the management of pouch dysfunction.

Authors:  Yasuko Maeda; María Elena Molina; Christine Norton; Simon D McLaughlin; Carolynne J Vaizey; Søren Laurberg; Susan K Clark
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.