Literature DB >> 23657352

Long-term speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users.

Margaret T Dillon1, Emily Buss, Marcia C Adunka, English R King, Harold C Pillsbury, Oliver F Adunka, Craig A Buchman.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: A review of a test battery presented in both quiet and noise may clarify what the progression of speech perception abilities is in older adult cochlear implant users and whether the performance declines with advancing age.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether older adults (≥65 years) with cochlear implants maintain stable speech perception performance after at least 10 years of listening experience with an external speech processor. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective analysis performed in an academic tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen older adult cochlear implant recipients with at least 10 years of listening experience. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception outcomes as measured with Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant words in quiet and Hearing in Noise Test sentences in quiet and steady-state noise were analyzed retrospectively at the 6-month and 1-, 5-, and 10-year postoperative follow-up intervals.
RESULTS: Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word scores remained stable between 6 months and 1 year of listening experience, improved significantly (P < .001) between 1 year and 5 years, and remained stable between 5 years and 10 years. Hearing in Noise Test sentence scores in quiet and noise showed a similar pattern, with stability in performance between the 6-month to 1-year and 5-year to 10-year follow-up intervals, and significantly improved performance (P = .04) between the 1-year and 5-year follow-up intervals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: On average, patients who undergo cochlear implantation at age 65 years or older do not experience a decline in speech perception performance with extended listening experience and may potentially continue to see improvements beyond the 1-year follow-up interval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23657352     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  23 in total

1.  Linguistic Context Versus Semantic Competition in Word Recognition by Younger and Older Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Nicole M Amichetti; Eriko Atagi; Ying-Yee Kong; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Bruna S S Mussoi; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Speech Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants: The Effects of Working Memory, Phonological Sensitivity, and Aging.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Michael S Harris; Lauren Boyce; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Hearing rehabilitation for unilateral deafness using a cochlear implant: the influence of the subjective duration of deafness on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Tobias Rader; Oliver Julian Waleka; Sebastian Strieth; Klaus Wolfgang Georg Eichhorn; Andrea Bohnert; Dimitrios Koutsimpelas; Christoph Matthias; Benjamin Philipp Ernst
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Use of Auditory Training and Its Influence on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Priyanka Reddy; Cheng Ma; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Cochlear implantation in the elderly: outcomes, long-term evolution, and predictive factors.

Authors:  Leire Garcia-Iza; Zuriñe Martinez; Ane Ugarte; Mercedes Fernandez; Xabier Altuna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Residual Cochlear Function in Adults and Children Receiving Cochlear Implants: Correlations With Speech Perception Outcomes.

Authors:  Tatyana Elizabeth Fontenot; Christopher Kenneth Giardina; Margaret Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Holly F Teagle; Lisa R Park; Kevin David Brown; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Carla V Valenzuela; Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Shannon M Lefler; Kanthaiah Koka; Craig A Buchman; Amanda J Ortmann
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.970

9.  Speech Recognition as a Function of Age and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Alexander T Murr; Michael W Canfarotta; Brendan P O'Connell; Emily Buss; English R King; Andrea L Bucker; Sarah A Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Matthew M Dedmon; Kevin D Brown; Margaret T Dillon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.970

10.  The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.

Authors:  William J Riggs; Chloe Vaughan; Jeffrey Skidmore; Sara Conroy; Angela Pellittieri; Brittney L Carter; Curtis J Stegman; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.