Literature DB >> 24907822

Development of speech glimpsing in synchronously and asynchronously modulated noise.

Joseph W Hall1, Emily Buss1, John H Grose1.   

Abstract

This study investigated development of the ability to integrate glimpses of speech in modulated noise. Noise was modulated synchronously across frequency or asynchronously such that when noise below 1300 Hz was "off," noise above 1300 Hz was "on," and vice versa. Asynchronous masking was used to examine the ability of listeners to integrate speech glimpses separated across time and frequency. The study used the Word Intelligibility by Picture Identification (WIPI) test and included adults, older children (age 8-10 yr) and younger children (5-7 yr). Results showed poorer masking release for the children than the adults for synchronous modulation but not for asynchronous modulation. It is possible that children can integrate cues relatively well when all intervals provide at least partial speech information (asynchronous modulation) but less well when some intervals provide little or no information (synchronous modulation). Control conditions indicated that children appeared to derive less benefit than adults from speech cues below 1300 Hz. This frequency effect was supported by supplementary conditions where the noise was unmodulated and the speech was low- or high-pass filtered. Possible sources of the developmental frequency effect include differences in frequency weighting, effective speech bandwidth, and the signal-to-noise ratio in the unmodulated noise condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24907822      PMCID: PMC4048449          DOI: 10.1121/1.4873518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.

Authors:  L S Eisenberg; R V Shannon; A S Martinez; J Wygonski; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Ken W Grant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lisa N Whittle; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Cas Smits; Joost M Festen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults.

Authors:  Marcin Wróblewski; Dawna E Lewis; Daniel L Valente; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  A picture identification test for hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  M Ross; J Lerman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1970-03

8.  Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose; Patricia A Roush
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Audibility-based predictions of speech recognition for children and adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise.

Authors:  Andrew Stuart
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  3 in total

1.  Factors affecting the development of speech recognition in steady and modulated noise.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Forward and Backward Masking of Consonants in School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Heather L Porter; Emily R Spitzer; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.