Literature DB >> 23653758

Introductory biology textbooks under-represent scientific process.

Dara B Duncan1, Alexandra Lubman, Sally G Hoskins.   

Abstract

Attrition of undergraduates from Biology majors is a long-standing problem. Introductory courses that fail to engage students or spark their curiosity by emphasizing the open-ended and creative nature of biological investigation and discovery could contribute to student detachment from the field. Our hypothesis was that introductory biology books devote relatively few figures to illustration of the design and interpretation of experiments or field studies, thereby de-emphasizing the scientific process. To investigate this possibility, we examined figures in six Introductory Biology textbooks published in 2008. On average, multistep scientific investigations were presented in fewer than 5% of the hundreds of figures in each book. Devoting such a small percentage of figures to the processes by which discoveries are made discourages an emphasis on scientific thinking. We suggest that by increasing significantly the illustration of scientific investigations, textbooks could support undergraduates' early interest in biology, stimulate the development of design and analytical skills, and inspire some students to participate in investigations of their own.

Year:  2011        PMID: 23653758      PMCID: PMC3577256          DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v12i2.307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ        ISSN: 1935-7877


  10 in total

Review 1.  Meeting the challenge of science literacy: project 2061 efforts to improve science education.

Authors:  Mary Koppal; Ann Caldwell
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse.

Authors:  Jonathan Osborne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Doing more for Kate.

Authors:  Thomas Cech; Donald Kennedy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Teaching more by lecturing less.

Authors:  Jennifer K Knight; William B Wood
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

5.  Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: seven strategies, from the simple to complex.

Authors:  Deborah Allen; Kimberly Tanner
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

Review 6.  Learning our L.I.M.I.T.S.: less is more in teaching science.

Authors:  Sally G Hoskins; Leslie M Stevens
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Community-based inquiry improves critical thinking in general education biology.

Authors:  Ian J Quitadamo; Celia L Faiola; James E Johnson; Martha J Kurtz
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology.

Authors:  Peter Armbruster; Maya Patel; Erika Johnson; Martha Weiss
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Comparison of views of the nature of science between natural science and nonscience majors.

Authors:  Marie C Desaulniers Miller; Lisa M Montplaisir; Erika G Offerdahl; Fu-Chih Cheng; Gerald L Ketterling
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Identifying future scientists: predicting persistence into research training.

Authors:  Richard McGee; Jill L Keller
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  On the edge of mathematics and biology integration: improving quantitative skills in undergraduate biology education.

Authors:  Jason Feser; Helen Vasaly; Jose Herrera
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Implementing recommendations for introductory biology by writing a new textbook.

Authors:  Mark J Barsoum; Patrick J Sellers; A Malcolm Campbell; Laurie J Heyer; Christopher J Paradise
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Examining an online microbiology game as an effective tool for teaching the scientific process.

Authors:  Kristi G Bowling; Yvonne Klisch; Shu Wang; Margaret Beier
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2013-05-06

4.  How much is too much assessment? Insight into assessment-driven student learning gains in large-scale undergraduate microbiology courses.

Authors:  Jack T H Wang; Mark A Schembri; Roy A Hall
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2013-05-06

5.  The CREATE Strategy for Intensive Analysis of Primary Literature Can Be Used Effectively by Newly Trained Faculty to Produce Multiple Gains in Diverse Students.

Authors:  Leslie M Stevens; Sally G Hoskins
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Lighten the Load: Scaffolding Visual Literacy in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

Authors:  Erika G Offerdahl; Jessie B Arneson; Nicholas Byrne
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  A Single, Narrowly Focused CREATE Primary Literature Module Evokes Gains in Genetics Students' Self-Efficacy and Understanding of the Research Process.

Authors:  Alison Krufka; Kristy Kenyon; Sally Hoskins
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2020-04-30

8.  CREATE cornerstone: introduction to scientific thinking, a new course for STEM-interested freshmen, demystifies scientific thinking through analysis of scientific literature.

Authors:  Alan J Gottesman; Sally G Hoskins
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.