Literature DB >> 18056303

Identifying future scientists: predicting persistence into research training.

Richard McGee1, Jill L Keller.   

Abstract

This study used semistructured interviews and grounded theory to look for characteristics among college undergraduates that predicted persistence into Ph.D. and M.D./Ph.D. training. Participants in the summer undergraduate and postbaccalaureate research programs at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine were interviewed at the start, near the end, and 8-12 months after their research experience. Of more than 200 themes considered, five characteristics predicted those students who went on to Ph.D. and M.D./Ph.D. training or to M.D. training intending to do research: 1) Curiosity to discover the unknown, 2) Enjoyment of problem solving, 3) A high level of independence, 4) The desire to help others indirectly through research, and 5) A flexible, minimally structured approach to the future. Web-based surveys with different students confirmed the high frequency of curiosity and/or problem solving as the primary reason students planned research careers. No evidence was found for differences among men, women, and minority and nonminority students. Although these results seem logical compared with successful scientists, their constancy, predictive capabilities, and sharp contrast to students who chose clinical medicine were striking. These results provide important insights into selection and motivation of potential biomedical scientists and the early experiences that will motivate them toward research careers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18056303      PMCID: PMC2104502          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.07-04-0020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  2 in total

1.  Collaborative co-mentored dissertations spanning institutions: influences on student development.

Authors:  Richard McGee; Mary J DeLong
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  The pipeline. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences.

Authors:  Susan H Russell; Mary P Hancock; James McCullough
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  34 in total

1.  Introductory biology textbooks under-represent scientific process.

Authors:  Dara B Duncan; Alexandra Lubman; Sally G Hoskins
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2011-12-01

2.  Involving undergraduates in genomics research to narrow the education-research gap.

Authors:  Serghei Mangul; Lana S Martin; Eleazar Eskin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  An ET-CURE pilot project supporting undergraduate training in cancer research, emerging technology, and health disparities.

Authors:  Danyell S Wilson; Bin Fang; William S Dalton; Cathy D Meade; John M Koomen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Improving Health Care Career Pipeline Programs for Underrepresented Students: Program Design that Makes a Difference.

Authors:  Shaneah Taylor; Francisco Iacobelli; Tracy Luedke; Phoenix Alicia Matthews; Melinda Monge; Jennifer Cooper; Jonathan Moreira; Paul Grippo; Jorge Girotti; Yamile Molina; Betina Yanez; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2019

5.  From Bench to Bedside: A communal utility value intervention to enhance students' biomedical science motivation.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Brown; Jessi L Smith; Dustin B Thoman; Jill M Allen; Gregg Muragishi
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20

6.  Promoting undergraduate interest, preparedness, and professional pursuit in the sciences: An outcomes evaluation of the SURE program at Emory University.

Authors:  Benjamin Junge; Catherine Quiñones; Jakub Kakietek; Daniel Teodorescu; Pat Marsteller
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Entering research: A course that creates community and structure for beginning undergraduate researchers in the STEM disciplines.

Authors:  Nicholas Balster; Christine Pfund; Raelyn Rediske; Janet Branchaw
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Defining Attributes and Metrics of Effective Research Mentoring Relationships.

Authors:  Christine Pfund; Angela Byars-Winston; Janet Branchaw; Sylvia Hurtado; Kevin Eagan
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2016-09

9.  How Women in Biomedical PhD Programs Manage Gender Consciousness as They Persist Toward Academic Research Careers.

Authors:  Robin Remich; Remi Jones; Christine V Wood; Patricia B Campbell; Richard McGee
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  A Narrative Analysis Examining Influential Factors of a Minority Research and Training Program.

Authors:  S Burton Gretchen; H Vicente Maria da Graça
Journal:  J Vocat Behav       Date:  2018-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.