Literature DB >> 23653688

The undergraduate teaching assistant experience offers opportunities similar to the undergraduate research experience.

Kelly A Schalk1, J Randy McGinnis, Jeffrey R Harring, Amy Hendrickson, Ann C Smith.   

Abstract

There has been a growing concern in higher education about our failure to produce scientifically trained workers and scientifically literate citizens. Active-learning and research-oriented activities are posited as ways to give students a deeper understanding of science. We report on an undergraduate teaching assistant (UTA) experience and suggest that students who participate as a UTA obtain benefits analogous to those who participate as an undergraduate research assistant (URA). We examined the experiences of 24 undergraduates acting as UTAs in a general microbiology course. Self-reported gains by the UTAs were supported by observational data from undergraduates in the course who were mentored by the UTAs and by the graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) with whom the UTAs worked. Specifically, data from the UTAs' journals and self-reported Likert scales and rubrics indicated that our teaching assistants developed professional characteristics such as self-confidence and communication and leadership skills, while they acquired knowledge of microbiology content and laboratory skills. Data from the undergraduate Likert scale as well as the pre- and post-GTA rubrics further confirmed our UTA's data interpretations. These findings are significant because they offer empirical data to support the suggestion that the UTA experience is an effective option for developing skills and knowledge in undergraduates that are essential for careers in science. The UTA experience provides a valuable alternative to the URA experience.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 23653688      PMCID: PMC3577154          DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v10.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ        ISSN: 1935-7877


  2 in total

1.  Introductory biology courses: a framework to support active learning in large enrollment introductory science courses.

Authors:  Ann C Smith; Richard Stewart; Patricia Shields; Jennifer Hayes-Klosteridis; Paulette Robinson; Robert Yuan
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

2.  Professional development. Who is responsible for preparing science teachers?

Authors:  Valerie Otero; Noah Finkelstein; Richard McCray; Steven Pollock
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 47.728

  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  Assistant instructors facilitate simulation for medical students.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Joanna Choi; Adela Mahmutovic; Helen Kim; Ivy A Le; Sara K Rasmussen
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Through the Looking CLASS: When Peer Leader Learning Attitudes Are Not What They Seem.

Authors:  Emily L Atieh; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Educ       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.979

3.  PILOTing Undergraduate Students to Hands-On Teaching and Research Skills.

Authors:  Robert A Borgon; Nicole Verity; Ken Teter
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2013-05-06

4.  A Case Study Documenting the Process by Which Biology Instructors Transition from Teacher-Centered to Learner-Centered Teaching.

Authors:  Gili Marbach-Ad; Carly Hunt Rietschel
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Implementing an Undergraduate Learning Assistant Program Tailored for Remote Instruction.

Authors:  Miriam E Martin; Arik Davidyan
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2021-03-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.