Literature DB >> 23645936

Mass Spectrometry-Based Multiplexing for the Analysis of Biomarkers in Drug Development and Clinical Diagnostics- How Much is too Much?

Uwe Christians1, Jacek Klepacki, Touraj Shokati, Jost Klawitter, Jelena Klawitter.   

Abstract

Biomarkers, or more specifically molecular markers, can detect biochemical changes associated with disease processes and drug effects before histopathological and pathophysiological changes occur. Multiplexing technologies such as high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS) allow for the measurement of molecular marker patterns that confer significantly more information than the measurement of a single parameter alone. The use of multiplexing assays for drug development, and as diagnostic tools, is attractive but will require regulatory review and approval and thus requires validation following regulatory guidances. Multiplexing assays always constitute a compromise. The number of analytes that can reasonably be included in a mass spectrometry-based multiplexing assay depend on the physico-chemical properties of the analytes and their integration into a single assay in terms of extraction, HPLC separation, ionization conditions and mass spectrometry detection. Another aspect includes biomedical considerations such as the differences in physiological concentrations of analytes, the required concentration range, and how much variability is acceptable before the clinical utility of a marker is negatively affected. Regulatory considerations include validation and quality control during sample analysis. Current bioanalytical regulatory guidelines have mostly been developed for single drug compounds and are not always adequate for multiplexing molecular marker assays that often quantify endogenous compounds. Specific guidances for multiplexing assays should be developed. Even if it is possible to integrate a wide variety and large number of analytes into a multiplexing assay, it should always be taken into consideration that a set of shorter, more specialized assays, may offer a more manageable and efficient alternative.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; liquid chromatography- mass spectrometry; metabolomics; multiplexing; regulatory aspects; validation

Year:  2012        PMID: 23645936      PMCID: PMC3640576          DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2012.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microchem J        ISSN: 0026-265X            Impact factor:   4.821


  21 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Ion suppression in mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Thomas M Annesley
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  A bioinformatician's view of the metabolome.

Authors:  Irene Nobeli; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 4.  Process map proposal for the validation of genomic biomarkers.

Authors:  Federico Goodsaid; Felix Frueh
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 5.  Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility.

Authors:  Nader Rifai; Michael A Gillette; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  J Cummings; T H Ward; A Greystoke; M Ranson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Tissue-specific, non-invasive toxicity biomarkers: translation from preclinical safety assessment to clinical safety monitoring.

Authors:  Patrick Y Muller; Frank Dieterle
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.481

8.  Method validation and measurement of biomarkers in nonclinical and clinical samples in drug development: a conference report.

Authors:  Jean W Lee; Russ S Weiner; Jeff M Sailstad; Ronald R Bowsher; Dean W Knuth; Peter J O'Brien; Jean L Fourcroy; Rakesh Dixit; Lini Pandite; Robert G Pietrusko; Holly D Soares; Valerie Quarmby; Ole L Vesterqvist; David M Potter; James L Witliff; Herbert A Fritche; Timothy O'Leary; Lorah Perlee; Sunil Kadam; John A Wagner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 4.200

9.  Validating regulatory-compliant wide dynamic range bioanalytical assays using chip-based nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Bradley L Ackermann; Ajai K Chaudhary
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Development and validation of an assay for the quantification of 11 nucleotides using LC/LC-electrospray ionization-MS.

Authors:  Jost Klawitter; Volker Schmitz; Jelena Klawitter; Dieter Leibfritz; Uwe Christians
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.365

View more
  6 in total

1.  Experimental MicroRNA Targeting Validation.

Authors:  Bala Gür Dedeoğlu; Senem Noyan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 2.  Proteomics and metabolomics in renal transplantation-quo vadis?

Authors:  Rahul Bohra; Jacek Klepacki; Jelena Klawitter; Jost Klawitter; Joshua M Thurman; Uwe Christians
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 3.  Biomarkers in Transplantation--Proteomics and Metabolomics.

Authors:  Uwe Christians; Jelena Klawitter; Jost Klawitter
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Amino acids in a targeted versus a non-targeted metabolomics LC-MS/MS assay. Are the results consistent?

Authors:  Jacek Klepacki; Jost Klawitter; Jelena Klawitter; Anis Karimpour-Fard; Joshua Thurman; Gordon Ingle; Dharmesh Patel; Uwe Christians
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.281

5.  A Combination of DNA-peptide Probes and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS): A Quasi-Targeted Proteomics Approach for Multiplexed MicroRNA Quantification.

Authors:  Feifei Xu; Weixian Zhou; Jianxiang Cao; Qingqing Xu; Dechen Jiang; Yun Chen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 6.  Mass Spectrometry for the Monitoring of Lipoprotein Oxidations by Myeloperoxidase in Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Catherine Coremans; Cédric Delporte; Frédéric Cotton; Phillipe Van De Borne; Karim Zouaoui Boudjeltia; Pierre Van Antwerpen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.