Literature DB >> 15846456

Method validation and measurement of biomarkers in nonclinical and clinical samples in drug development: a conference report.

Jean W Lee1, Russ S Weiner, Jeff M Sailstad, Ronald R Bowsher, Dean W Knuth, Peter J O'Brien, Jean L Fourcroy, Rakesh Dixit, Lini Pandite, Robert G Pietrusko, Holly D Soares, Valerie Quarmby, Ole L Vesterqvist, David M Potter, James L Witliff, Herbert A Fritche, Timothy O'Leary, Lorah Perlee, Sunil Kadam, John A Wagner.   

Abstract

Biomarkers are increasingly used in drug development to aid scientific and clinical decisions regarding the progress of candidate and marketed therapeutics. Biomarkers can improve the understanding of diseases as well as therapeutic and off-target effects of drugs. Early implementation of biomarker strategies thus promises to reduce costs and time-to-market as drugs proceed through increasingly costly and complex clinical development programs. The 2003 American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences/Clinical Ligand Assay Society Biomarkers Workshop (Salt Lake City, UT, USA, October 24-25, 2003) addressed key issues in biomarker research, with an emphasis on the validation and implementation of biochemical biomarker assays, covering from preclinical discovery of efficacy and toxicity biomarkers through clinical and postmarketing implementation. This summary report of the workshop focuses on the major issues discussed during presentations and open forums and noted consensus achieved among the participants on topics from nomenclature to best practices. For example, it was agreed that because reliable and accurate data provide the basis for sound decision making, biomarker assays must be validated in a manner that enables the creation of such data. The nature of biomarker measurements often precludes direct application of regulatory guidelines established for clinical diagnostics or drug bioanalysis, and future guidance on biomarker assay validation should therefore be adaptable enough that validation criteria do not stifle creative biomarker solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15846456     DOI: 10.1007/s11095-005-2495-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  24 in total

1.  Bioanalytical method validation--a revisit with a decade of progress.

Authors:  V P Shah; K K Midha; J W Findlay; H M Hill; J D Hulse; I J McGilveray; G McKay; K J Miller; R N Patnaik; M L Powell; A Tonelli; C T Viswanathan; A Yacobi
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Validation of immunoassays for bioanalysis: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  J W Findlay; W C Smith; J W Lee; G D Nordblom; I Das; B S DeSilva; M N Khan; R R Bowsher
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.935

Review 3.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Workshop on bioanalytical methods validation for macromolecules: summary report.

Authors:  K J Miller; R R Bowsher; A Celniker; J Gibbons; S Gupta; J W Lee; S J Swanson; W C Smith; R S Weiner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi; Ronald W Hansen; Henry G Grabowski
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Recommendations for the bioanalytical method validation of ligand-binding assays to support pharmacokinetic assessments of macromolecules.

Authors:  Binodh DeSilva; Wendell Smith; Russell Weiner; Marian Kelley; JoMarie Smolec; Ben Lee; Masood Khan; Richard Tacey; Howard Hill; Abbie Celniker
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Mechanism-based pharmacodynamic modeling.

Authors:  G Levy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 8.  Selecting and validating biologic markers for drug development.

Authors:  W A Colburn
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 9.  Delivery of high-quality biomarker assays.

Authors:  Brian N Swanson
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  Optimization of Rolling-Circle Amplified Protein Microarrays for Multiplexed Protein Profiling.

Authors:  Weiping Shao; Zhimin Zhou; Isabelle Laroche; Hong Lu; Qiuling Zong; Dhavalkumar D. Patel; Stephen Kingsmore; Steven P. Piccoli
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2003
View more
  48 in total

1.  Molecular staging estimates occult tumor burden in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alex Mejia; Stephanie Schulz; Terry Hyslop; David S Weinberg; Scott A Waldman
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.394

Review 2.  Ligand binding assays in the 21st century laboratory: recommendations for characterization and supply of critical reagents.

Authors:  Denise M O'Hara; Valerie Theobald; Adrienne Clements Egan; Joel Usansky; Murli Krishna; Julie TerWee; Mauricio Maia; Frank P Spriggs; John Kenney; Afshin Safavi; Jeannine Keefe
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Recommendations for Use and Fit-for-Purpose Validation of Biomarker Multiplex Ligand Binding Assays in Drug Development.

Authors:  Darshana Jani; John Allinson; Flora Berisha; Kyra J Cowan; Viswanath Devanarayan; Carol Gleason; Andreas Jeromin; Steve Keller; Masood U Khan; Bill Nowatzke; Paul Rhyne; Laurie Stephen
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  SITC cancer immunotherapy resource document: a compass in the land of biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Srabani Bhaumik; Kavita Dhodapkar; Jean-Charles J B Grivel; Sumati Gupta; Brent A Hanks; Sylvia Janetzki; Thomas O Kleen; Yoshinobu Koguchi; Amanda W Lund; Cristina Maccalli; Yolanda D Mahnke; Ruslan D Novosiadly; Senthamil R Selvan; Tasha Sims; Yingdong Zhao; Holden T Maecker
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 13.751

5.  Fit-for-purpose method development and validation for successful biomarker measurement.

Authors:  Jean W Lee; Viswanath Devanarayan; Yu Chen Barrett; Russell Weiner; John Allinson; Scott Fountain; Stephen Keller; Ira Weinryb; Marie Green; Larry Duan; James A Rogers; Robert Millham; Peter J O'Brien; Jeff Sailstad; Masood Khan; Chad Ray; John A Wagner
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Multiplexed protein measurement: technologies and applications of protein and antibody arrays.

Authors:  Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 7.  Biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  J Cummings; T H Ward; A Greystoke; M Ranson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Specificity and accuracy data for ligand-binding assays for macromolecules should be interpreted with caution.

Authors:  John W A Findlay
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  An approach to the validation of flow cytometry methods.

Authors:  Jo Cunliffe; Nicola Derbyshire; Sue Keeler; Ruth Coldwell
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  Validation of analytic methods for biomarkers used in drug development.

Authors:  Cindy H Chau; Olivier Rixe; Howard McLeod; William D Figg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.