Literature DB >> 23643062

Enhanced intracellular delivery of a model drug using microbubbles produced by a microfluidic device.

Adam J Dixon1, Ali H Dhanaliwala, Johnny L Chen, John A Hossack.   

Abstract

Focal drug delivery to a vessel wall facilitated by intravascular ultrasound and microbubbles holds promise as a potential therapy for atherosclerosis. Conventional methods of microbubble administration result in rapid clearance from the bloodstream and significant drug loss. To address these limitations, we evaluated whether drug delivery could be achieved with transiently stable microbubbles produced in real time and in close proximity to the therapeutic site. Rat aortic smooth muscle cells were placed in a flow chamber designed to simulate physiological flow conditions. A flow-focusing microfluidic device produced 8 μm diameter monodisperse microbubbles within the flow chamber, and ultrasound was applied to enhance uptake of a surrogate drug (calcein). Acoustic pressures up to 300 kPa and flow rates up to 18 mL/s were investigated. Microbubbles generated by the flow-focusing microfluidic device were stabilized with a polyethylene glycol-40 stearate shell and had either a perfluorobutane (PFB) or nitrogen gas core. The gas core composition affected stability, with PFB and nitrogen microbubbles exhibiting half-lives of 40.7 and 18.2 s, respectively. Calcein uptake was observed at lower acoustic pressures with nitrogen microbubbles (100 kPa) than with PFB microbubbles (200 kPa) (p < 0.05, n > 3). In addition, delivery was observed at all flow rates, with maximal delivery (>70% of cells) occurring at a flow rate of 9 mL/s. These results demonstrate the potential of transiently stable microbubbles produced in real time and in close proximity to the intended therapeutic site for enhancing localized drug delivery.
Copyright © 2013 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23643062      PMCID: PMC3674153          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  42 in total

Review 1.  Introduction to ultrasound contrast agents: physics overview.

Authors:  L Dalla Palma; M Bertolotto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery.

Authors:  Sophie Mehier-Humbert; Thierry Bettinger; Feng Yan; Richard H Guy
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Optimal drug and gene delivery in cancer cells by ultrasound-induced cavitation.

Authors:  Irina V Larina; B Mark Evers; Rinat O Esenaliev
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Harmonic intravascular ultrasound imaging with a dual-frequency catheter.

Authors:  Martijn E Frijlink; David E Goertz; Hendrik J Vos; Erik Tesselaar; Gerrit Blacquière; Andries Gisolf; Rob Krams; Antonius F W van der Steen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Tailoring the size distribution of ultrasound contrast agents: possible method for improving sensitivity in molecular imaging.

Authors:  Esra Talu; Kanaka Hettiarachchi; Shukui Zhao; Robert L Powell; Abraham P Lee; Marjorie L Longo; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.488

6.  Focused in vivo delivery of plasmid DNA to the porcine vascular wall via intravascular ultrasound destruction of microbubbles.

Authors:  Linsey C Phillips; Alexander L Klibanov; Douglas K Bowles; Michael Ragosta; John A Hossack; Brian R Wamhoff
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 1.934

Review 7.  Can ultrasound enable efficient intracellular uptake of molecules? A retrospective literature review and analysis.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Jing Yan; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Transfection of mammalian cells with plasmid DNA by scrape loading and sonication loading.

Authors:  M Fechheimer; J F Boylan; S Parker; J E Sisken; G L Patel; S G Zimmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Improving sensitivity in ultrasound molecular imaging by tailoring contrast agent size distribution: in vivo studies.

Authors:  Jason E Streeter; Ryan Gessner; Iman Miles; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  Acoustic responses of monodisperse lipid-encapsulated microbubble contrast agents produced by flow focusing.

Authors:  Mehmet Kaya; Steven Feingold; Kanaka Hettiarachchi; Abraham P Lee; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Bubble Sci Eng Technol       Date:  2010-12
View more
  19 in total

1.  An IVUS transducer for microbubble therapies.

Authors:  Joseph P Kilroy; Abhay V Patil; Joshua J Rychak; John A Hossack
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Engineering the Echogenic Properties of Microfluidic Microbubbles Using Mixtures of Recombinant Protein and Amphiphilic Copolymers.

Authors:  Zhuo Chen; Katherine W Pulsipher; Rajarshi Chattaraj; Daniel A Hammer; Chandra M Sehgal; Daeyeon Lee
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.882

3.  Reducing Neointima Formation in a Swine Model with IVUS and Sirolimus Microbubbles.

Authors:  Joseph P Kilroy; Ali H Dhanaliwala; Alexander L Klibanov; Douglas K Bowles; Brian R Wamhoff; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Closed-loop feedback control of microbubble diameter from a flow-focusing microfluidic device.

Authors:  Yanjun Xie; Adam J Dixon; J M Robert Rickel; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Localized in vivo model drug delivery with intravascular ultrasound and microbubbles.

Authors:  Joseph P Kilroy; Alexander L Klibanov; Brian R Wamhoff; Douglas K Bowles; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Microfluidic manufacture of rt-PA -loaded echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Madhuvanthi A Kandadai; Prithviraj Mukherjee; Himanshu Shekhar; George J Shaw; Ian Papautsky; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.838

7.  Efficacy of Sonothrombolysis Using Microbubbles Produced by a Catheter-Based Microfluidic Device in a Rat Model of Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Adam J Dixon; Jun Li; John-Marschner Robert Rickel; Alexander L Klibanov; Zhiyi Zuo; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Synthesis and characterization of transiently stable albumin-coated microbubbles via a flow-focusing microfluidic device.

Authors:  Johnny L Chen; Ali H Dhanaliwala; Adam J Dixon; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  In Vitro Sonothrombolysis Enhancement by Transiently Stable Microbubbles Produced by a Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Device.

Authors:  Adam J Dixon; John Marschner Robert Rickel; Brian D Shin; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Control of Acoustic Cavitation for Efficient Sonoporation with Phase-Shift Nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Mark T Burgess; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.