Literature DB >> 22425381

Can ultrasound enable efficient intracellular uptake of molecules? A retrospective literature review and analysis.

Ying Liu1, Jing Yan, Mark R Prausnitz.   

Abstract

Most applications of therapeutic ultrasound (US) for intracellular delivery of drugs, proteins, DNA/RNA and other compounds would benefit from efficient uptake of these molecules into large numbers of cells without killing cells in the process. In this study we tested the hypothesis that efficient intracellular uptake of molecules can be achieved with high cell viability after US exposure in vitro. A search of the literature for studies with quantitative data on uptake and viability yielded 26 published papers containing 898 experimental data points. Analysis of these studies showed that just 7.7% of the data points corresponded to relatively efficient uptake (>50% of cells exhibiting uptake). Closer examination of the data showed that use of Definity US contrast agent (as opposed to Optison) and elevated sonication temperature at 37°C (as opposed to room temperature) were associated with high uptake, which we further validated through independent experiments carried out in this study. Although these factors contributed to high uptake, almost all data with efficient uptake were from studies that had not accounted for lysed cells when determining cell viability. Based on retrospective analysis of the data, we showed that not accounting for lysed cells can dramatically increase the calculated uptake efficiency. We further argue that if all the data considered in this study were re-analyzed to account for lysed cells, there would be essentially no data with efficient uptake. We therefore conclude that the literature does not support the hypothesis that efficient intracellular uptake of molecules can be achieved with high cell viability after US exposure in vitro, which poses a challenge to future applications of US that require efficient intracellular delivery.
Copyright © 2012 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425381      PMCID: PMC3428263          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  55 in total

1.  Quantification of microbubble destruction of three fluorocarbon-filled ultrasonic contrast agents.

Authors:  C M Moran; T Anderson; S D Pye; V Sboros; W N McDicken
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. II. Heterogeneous effects on cells.

Authors:  H R Guzmán; D X Nguyen; S Khan; M R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Intracellular drug delivery using low-frequency ultrasound: quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability.

Authors:  K Keyhani; H R Guzmán; A Parsons; T N Lewis; M R Prausnitz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Therapeutic ultrasound: its application in drug delivery.

Authors:  Ka-yun Ng; Yang Liu
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.944

5.  Sonoluminescence as an indicator of cell membrane disruption by acoustic cavitation.

Authors:  S A Cochran; M R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Photomechanical transdermal delivery: the effect of laser confinement.

Authors:  S Lee; D J McAuliffe; T J Flotte; N Kollias; A G Doukas
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Equilibrium loading of cells with macromolecules by ultrasound: effects of molecular size and acoustic energy.

Authors:  Héctor R Guzmán; Daniel X Nguyen; Andrew J McNamara; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  Pressure-dependent attenuation in ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Quan Chen; James Zagzebski; Thaddeus Wilson; Timothy Stiles
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Frequency-dependent evaluation of the role of definity in producing sonoporation of Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  Monica M Forbes; Ryan L Steinberg; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Shock wave-mediated molecular delivery into cells.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kodama; Apostolos G Doukas; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2002-01-30
View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  In vitro and ex vivo strategies for intracellular delivery.

Authors:  Martin P Stewart; Armon Sharei; Xiaoyun Ding; Gaurav Sahay; Robert Langer; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effect of a Flexible Linker on Recombinant Expression of Cell-Penetrating Peptide Fusion Proteins and Their Translocation into Fungal Cells.

Authors:  Zifan Gong; Mackenzie T Walls; Alisha N Karley; Amy J Karlsson
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Acoustic Cavitation-Mediated Delivery of Small Interfering Ribonucleic Acids with Phase-Shift Nano-Emulsions.

Authors:  Mark T Burgess; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Single-site sonoporation disrupts actin cytoskeleton organization.

Authors:  Xian Chen; Ruen Shan Leow; Yaxin Hu; Jennifer M F Wan; Alfred C H Yu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Multiparameter evaluation of in vivo gene delivery using ultrasound-guided, microbubble-enhanced sonoporation.

Authors:  Galina Shapiro; Andrew W Wong; Maxim Bez; Fang Yang; Sarah Tam; Lisa Even; Dmitriy Sheyn; Shiran Ben-David; Wafa Tawackoli; Gadi Pelled; Katherine W Ferrara; Dan Gazit
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Energy Transfer Mechanisms during Molecular Delivery to Cells by Laser-Activated Carbon Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Aritra Sengupta; Michael D Gray; Sean C Kelly; Stefany Y Holguin; Naresh N Thadhani; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Synthesis and characterization of transiently stable albumin-coated microbubbles via a flow-focusing microfluidic device.

Authors:  Johnny L Chen; Ali H Dhanaliwala; Adam J Dixon; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Low Intensity Ultrasound Mediated Liposomal Doxorubicin Delivery Using Polymer Microbubbles.

Authors:  Francois T H Yu; Xucai Chen; Jianjun Wang; Bin Qin; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Enhanced intracellular delivery of a model drug using microbubbles produced by a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Adam J Dixon; Ali H Dhanaliwala; Johnny L Chen; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Control of Acoustic Cavitation for Efficient Sonoporation with Phase-Shift Nanoemulsions.

Authors:  Mark T Burgess; Tyrone M Porter
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.