Bart H W te Lindert1, Eus J W Van Someren. 1. Department of Sleep and Cognition, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, an institute of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. b.te.lindert@nin.knaw.nl
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Although currently more affordable than polysomnography, actigraphic sleep estimates have disadvantages. Brand-specific differences in data reduction impede pooling of data in large-scale cohorts and may not fully exploit movement information. Sleep estimate reliability might improve by advanced analyses of three-axial, linear accelerometry data sampled at a high rate, which is now feasible using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). However, it might take some time before these analyses become available. To provide ongoing studies with backward compatibility while already switching from actigraphy to MEMS accelerometry, we designed and validated a method to transform accelerometry data into the traditional actigraphic movement counts, thus allowing for the use of validated algorithms to estimate sleep parameters. DESIGN: Simultaneous actigraphy and MEMS-accelerometry recording. SETTING: Home, unrestrained. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen healthy adults (23-36 y, 10 males, 5 females). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Actigraphic movement counts/15-sec and 50-Hz digitized MEMS-accelerometry. ANALYSES: Passing-Bablok regression optimized transformation of MEMS-accelerometry signals to movement counts. Kappa statistics calculated agreement between individual epochs scored as wake or sleep. Bland-Altman plots evaluated reliability of common sleep variables both between and within actigraphs and MEMS-accelerometers. RESULTS: Agreement between epochs was almost perfect at the low, medium, and high threshold (kappa = 0.87 ± 0.05, 0.85 ± 0.06, and 0.83 ± 0.07). Sleep parameter agreement was better between two MEMS-accelerometers or a MEMS-accelerometer and an actigraph than between two actigraphs. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm allows for continuity of outcome parameters in ongoing actigraphy studies that consider switching to MEMS-accelerometers. Its implementation makes backward compatibility feasible, while collecting raw data that, in time, could provide better sleep estimates and promote cross-study data pooling.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Although currently more affordable than polysomnography, actigraphic sleep estimates have disadvantages. Brand-specific differences in data reduction impede pooling of data in large-scale cohorts and may not fully exploit movement information. Sleep estimate reliability might improve by advanced analyses of three-axial, linear accelerometry data sampled at a high rate, which is now feasible using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). However, it might take some time before these analyses become available. To provide ongoing studies with backward compatibility while already switching from actigraphy to MEMS accelerometry, we designed and validated a method to transform accelerometry data into the traditional actigraphic movement counts, thus allowing for the use of validated algorithms to estimate sleep parameters. DESIGN: Simultaneous actigraphy and MEMS-accelerometry recording. SETTING: Home, unrestrained. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen healthy adults (23-36 y, 10 males, 5 females). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Actigraphic movement counts/15-sec and 50-Hz digitized MEMS-accelerometry. ANALYSES: Passing-Bablok regression optimized transformation of MEMS-accelerometry signals to movement counts. Kappa statistics calculated agreement between individual epochs scored as wake or sleep. Bland-Altman plots evaluated reliability of common sleep variables both between and within actigraphs and MEMS-accelerometers. RESULTS: Agreement between epochs was almost perfect at the low, medium, and high threshold (kappa = 0.87 ± 0.05, 0.85 ± 0.06, and 0.83 ± 0.07). Sleep parameter agreement was better between two MEMS-accelerometers or a MEMS-accelerometer and an actigraph than between two actigraphs. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm allows for continuity of outcome parameters in ongoing actigraphy studies that consider switching to MEMS-accelerometers. Its implementation makes backward compatibility feasible, while collecting raw data that, in time, could provide better sleep estimates and promote cross-study data pooling.
Authors: Annie Vallières; Hans Ivers; Célyne H Bastien; Simon Beaulieu-Bonneau; Charles M Morin Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: E J van Someren; W A van Gool; B F Vonk; M Mirmiran; J D Speelman; D A Bosch; D F Swaab Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 1993-07 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Wisse P van der Meijden; Bart H W Te Lindert; Jennifer R Ramautar; Yishul Wei; Joris E Coppens; Maarten Kamermans; Christian Cajochen; Patrice Bourgin; Eus J W Van Someren Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Dirk Jan Stenvers; Aldo Jongejan; Sadaf Atiqi; Jeroen P Vreijling; Eelkje J Limonard; Erik Endert; Frank Baas; Perry D Moerland; Eric Fliers; Andries Kalsbeek; Peter H Bisschop Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2019-02-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Thom S Lysen; Pinar Yilmaz; Florian Dubost; M Arfan Ikram; Marleen de Bruijne; Meike W Vernooij; Annemarie I Luik Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 5.296
Authors: Wisse P van der Meijden; Jamie L Van Someren; Bart H W Te Lindert; Jessica Bruijel; Floor van Oosterhout; Joris E Coppens; Andries Kalsbeek; Christian Cajochen; Patrice Bourgin; Eus J W Van Someren Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Annelies Brouwer; Daniël H van Raalte; Michaela Diamant; Femke Rutters; Eus J W van Someren; Frank J Snoek; Aartjan T F Beekman; Marijke A Bremmer Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Chloe Wilson; Alissa Nichles; Natalia Zmicerevska; Joanne Sarah Carpenter; Yun Ju Christine Song; Catherine McHugh; Blake Hamilton; Samuel Hockey; Elizabeth M Scott; Ian B Hickie Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jennifer Huberty; Diane K Ehlers; Jonathan Kurka; Barbara Ainsworth; Matthew Buman Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 2.809