OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effects of stabilizing the paralyzed trunk and pelvis with electrical stimulation on manual wheelchair propulsion. DESIGN: Single-subject design case series with subjects acting as their own concurrent controls. SETTING: Hospital-based clinical biomechanics laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=6; 4 men, 2 women; mean age ± SD, 46 ± 10.8y) who were long-time users (6.1 ± 3.9y) of implanted neuroprostheses for lower extremity function and had chronic (8.6 ± 2.8y) midcervical- or thoracic-level injuries (C6-T10). INTERVENTIONS: Continuous low-level stimulation to the hip (gluteus maximus, posterior adductor, or hamstrings) and trunk extensor (lumbar erector spinae and/or quadratus lumborum) muscles with implanted intramuscular electrodes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pushrim kinetics (peak resultant force, fraction effective force), kinematics (cadence, stroke length, maximum forward lean), and peak shoulder moment at preferred speed over 10-m level surface; speed, pushrim kinetics, and subjective ratings of effort for level 100-m sprints and up a 30.5-m ramp of approximately 5% grade. RESULTS: Three of 5 subjects demonstrated reduced peak resultant pushrim forces (P≤.014) and improved efficiency (P≤.048) with stimulation during self-paced level propulsion. Peak sagittal shoulder moment remained unchanged in 3 subjects and increased in 2 others (P<.001). Maximal forward trunk lean also increased by 19% to 26% (P<.001) with stimulation in these 3 subjects. Stroke lengths were unchanged by stimulation in all subjects, and 2 showed extremely small (5%) but statistically significant increases in cadence (P≤.021). Performance measures for sprints and inclines were generally unchanged with stimulation; however, subjects consistently rated propulsion with stimulation to be easier for both surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: Stabilizing the pelvis and trunk with low levels of continuous electrical stimulation to the lumbar trunk and hip extensors can positively impact the mechanics of manual wheelchair propulsion and reduce both perceived and physical measures of effort.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effects of stabilizing the paralyzed trunk and pelvis with electrical stimulation on manual wheelchair propulsion. DESIGN: Single-subject design case series with subjects acting as their own concurrent controls. SETTING: Hospital-based clinical biomechanics laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=6; 4 men, 2 women; mean age ± SD, 46 ± 10.8y) who were long-time users (6.1 ± 3.9y) of implanted neuroprostheses for lower extremity function and had chronic (8.6 ± 2.8y) midcervical- or thoracic-level injuries (C6-T10). INTERVENTIONS: Continuous low-level stimulation to the hip (gluteus maximus, posterior adductor, or hamstrings) and trunk extensor (lumbar erector spinae and/or quadratus lumborum) muscles with implanted intramuscular electrodes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pushrim kinetics (peak resultant force, fraction effective force), kinematics (cadence, stroke length, maximum forward lean), and peak shoulder moment at preferred speed over 10-m level surface; speed, pushrim kinetics, and subjective ratings of effort for level 100-m sprints and up a 30.5-m ramp of approximately 5% grade. RESULTS: Three of 5 subjects demonstrated reduced peak resultant pushrim forces (P≤.014) and improved efficiency (P≤.048) with stimulation during self-paced level propulsion. Peak sagittal shoulder moment remained unchanged in 3 subjects and increased in 2 others (P<.001). Maximal forward trunk lean also increased by 19% to 26% (P<.001) with stimulation in these 3 subjects. Stroke lengths were unchanged by stimulation in all subjects, and 2 showed extremely small (5%) but statistically significant increases in cadence (P≤.021). Performance measures for sprints and inclines were generally unchanged with stimulation; however, subjects consistently rated propulsion with stimulation to be easier for both surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: Stabilizing the pelvis and trunk with low levels of continuous electrical stimulation to the lumbar trunk and hip extensors can positively impact the mechanics of manual wheelchair propulsion and reduce both perceived and physical measures of effort.
Authors: Vivian K Mushahwar; Patrick L Jacobs; Richard A Normann; Ronald J Triolo; Naomi Kleitman Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2007-08-22 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: B Smith; Z Tang; M W Johnson; S Pourmehdi; M M Gazdik; J R Buckett; P H Peckham Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: John W Chow; Tim A Millikan; Les G Carlton; Woen-sik Chae; Young-tae Lim; Marty I Morse Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Ronald J Triolo; Stephanie Nogan Bailey; Michael E Miller; Lisa M Lombardo; Musa L Audu Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Chester H Ho; Ronald J Triolo; Anastasia L Elias; Kevin L Kilgore; Anthony F DiMarco; Kath Bogie; Albert H Vette; Musa L Audu; Rudi Kobetic; Sarah R Chang; K Ming Chan; Sean Dukelow; Dennis J Bourbeau; Steven W Brose; Kenneth J Gustafson; Zelma H T Kiss; Vivian K Mushahwar Journal: Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 1.784
Authors: Akhil Bheemreddy; Lisa M Lombardo; Michael E Miller; Kevin M Foglyano; Stephanie Nogan-Bailey; Ronald J Triolo; Musa L Audu Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 2.356