Literature DB >> 20674921

The influence of altering push force effectiveness on upper extremity demand during wheelchair propulsion.

Jeffery W Rankin1, Andrew M Kwarciak, W Mark Richter, Richard R Neptune.   

Abstract

Manual wheelchair propulsion has been linked to a high incidence of overuse injury and pain in the upper extremity, which may be caused by the high load requirements and low mechanical efficiency of the task. Previous studies have suggested that poor mechanical efficiency may be due to a low effective handrim force (i.e. applied force that is not directed tangential to the handrim). As a result, studies attempting to reduce upper extremity demand have used various measures of force effectiveness (e.g., fraction effective force, FEF) as a guide for modifying propulsion technique, developing rehabilitation programs and configuring wheelchairs. However, the relationship between FEF and upper extremity demand is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to use forward dynamics simulations of wheelchair propulsion to determine the influence of FEF on upper extremity demand by quantifying individual muscle stress, work and handrim force contributions at different values of FEF. Simulations maximizing and minimizing FEF resulted in higher average muscle stresses (23% and 112%) and total muscle work (28% and 71%) compared to a nominal FEF simulation. The maximal FEF simulation also shifted muscle use from muscles crossing the elbow to those at the shoulder (e.g., rotator cuff muscles), placing greater demand on shoulder muscles during propulsion. The optimal FEF value appears to represent a balance between increasing push force effectiveness to increase mechanical efficiency and minimize upper extremity demand. Thus, care should be taken in using force effectiveness as a metric to reduce upper extremity demand.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674921      PMCID: PMC2963661          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  39 in total

1.  Consequence of feedback-based learning of an effective hand rim wheelchair force production on mechanical efficiency.

Authors:  S de Groot; H E J Veeger; A P Hollander; L H V van der Woude
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  The push force pattern in manual wheelchair propulsion as a balance between cost and effect.

Authors:  L A Rozendaal; H E J Veeger; L H V van der Woude
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Low-impact wheelchair propulsion: achievable and acceptable.

Authors:  W Mark Richter; Peter W Axelson
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 May-Jun

4.  A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control.

Authors:  Katherine R S Holzbaur; Wendy M Murray; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Biomechanics and strength of manual wheelchair users.

Authors:  Fabrisia Ambrosio; Michael L Boninger; Aaron L Souza; Shirley G Fitzgerald; Alicia M Koontz; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Is effective force application in handrim wheelchair propulsion also efficient?

Authors:  D J J Bregman; S van Drongelen; H E J Veeger
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Glenohumeral contact forces and muscle forces evaluated in wheelchair-related activities of daily living in able-bodied subjects versus subjects with paraplegia and tetraplegia.

Authors:  Stefan van Drongelen; Lucas H van der Woude; Thomas W Janssen; Edmond L Angenot; Edward K Chadwick; Dirkjan H Veeger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  The effect of visual biofeedback on the propulsion effectiveness of experienced wheelchair users.

Authors:  Brian R Kotajarvi; Jeffrey R Basford; Kai-Nan An; Duane A Morrow; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Three-dimensional pushrim forces during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  M L Boninger; R A Cooper; R N Robertson; S D Shimada
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Effects of spinal cord injury level on the activity of shoulder muscles during wheelchair propulsion: an electromyographic study.

Authors:  Sara J Mulroy; Shawn Farrokhi; Craig J Newsam; Jacquelin Perry
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  15 in total

1.  Start-up propulsion biomechanics changes with fatiguing activity in persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Fransiska M Bossuyt; Nathan S Hogaboom; Lynn A Worobey; Alicia M Koontz; Ursina Arnet; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Biomechanical contributions of posterior deltoid and teres minor in the context of axillary nerve injury: a computational study.

Authors:  Dustin L Crouch; Johannes F Plate; Zhongyu Li; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Effects of intramuscular trunk stimulation on manual wheelchair propulsion mechanics in 6 subjects with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ronald J Triolo; Stephanie Nogan Bailey; Lisa M Lombardo; Michael E Miller; Kevin Foglyano; Musa L Audu
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Computer simulation of nerve transfer strategies for restoring shoulder function after adult C5 and C6 root avulsion injuries.

Authors:  Dustin L Crouch; Zhongyu Li; Jonathan C Barnwell; Johannes F Plate; Melissa Daly; Katherine R Saul
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Musculotendon lengths and moment arms for a three-dimensional upper-extremity model.

Authors:  Jeffery W Rankin; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Individual muscle contributions to push and recovery subtasks during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Jeffery W Rankin; W Mark Richter; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Benchmarking of dynamic simulation predictions in two software platforms using an upper limb musculoskeletal model.

Authors:  Katherine R Saul; Xiao Hu; Craig M Goehler; Meghan E Vidt; Melissa Daly; Anca Velisar; Wendy M Murray
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  The influence of wheelchair propulsion hand pattern on upper extremity muscle power and stress.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slowik; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  The influence of wheelchair propulsion technique on upper extremity muscle demand: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jeffery W Rankin; Andrew M Kwarciak; W Mark Richter; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Compensatory strategies during manual wheelchair propulsion in response to weakness in individual muscle groups: A simulation study.

Authors:  Jonathan S Slowik; Jill L McNitt-Gray; Philip S Requejo; Sara J Mulroy; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.