BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In patients with acute stroke, the location and extent of intravascular thrombi correlate with clinical and imaging outcomes and have been used to predict the success of intravenous thrombolysis. We hypothesized that 4D-CTA reconstructed from whole-brain CTP more closely outlines intracranial thrombi than conventional single-phase CTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with anterior circulation occlusion were retrospectively analyzed. For 4D-CTA, temporal maximum intensity projections were calculated that combine all 30 spiral scans of the CTP examination through temporal fusion. Thrombus extent was assessed by a semi-quantitative clot burden score (0-10; in which 0 = complete unilateral anterior circulation occlusion and 10 = patent vasculature). In patients with sufficient collateral flow, the length of the filling defect and corresponding hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign on NCCT were measured. RESULTS: Clot burden on temporal maximum intensity projection (median clot burden score, 7.0; interquartile range, 5.1-8.0) was significantly lower than on single-phase CT angiography (median, 6.0; interquartile range, 4.5-7.0; P < .0001). The length of the hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign (14.30 ± 5.93 mm) showed excellent correlation with the filling defect in the middle cerebral artery on temporal maximum intensity projection (13.40 ± 6.40 mm); this filling defect was larger on single-phase CT angiography (18.08 ± 6.54 mm; P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: As the result of an increased sensitivity for collateral flow, 4D-CTA temporal maximum intensity projection more closely outlines intracranial thrombi than conventional single-phase CT angiography. Our findings can be helpful when planning acute neurointervention. Further research is necessary to validate our data and assess the use of 4D-CTA in predicting response to different recanalization strategies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In patients with acute stroke, the location and extent of intravascular thrombi correlate with clinical and imaging outcomes and have been used to predict the success of intravenous thrombolysis. We hypothesized that 4D-CTA reconstructed from whole-brain CTP more closely outlines intracranial thrombi than conventional single-phase CTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with anterior circulation occlusion were retrospectively analyzed. For 4D-CTA, temporal maximum intensity projections were calculated that combine all 30 spiral scans of the CTP examination through temporal fusion. Thrombus extent was assessed by a semi-quantitative clot burden score (0-10; in which 0 = complete unilateral anterior circulation occlusion and 10 = patent vasculature). In patients with sufficient collateral flow, the length of the filling defect and corresponding hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign on NCCT were measured. RESULTS: Clot burden on temporal maximum intensity projection (median clot burden score, 7.0; interquartile range, 5.1-8.0) was significantly lower than on single-phase CT angiography (median, 6.0; interquartile range, 4.5-7.0; P < .0001). The length of the hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign (14.30 ± 5.93 mm) showed excellent correlation with the filling defect in the middle cerebral artery on temporal maximum intensity projection (13.40 ± 6.40 mm); this filling defect was larger on single-phase CT angiography (18.08 ± 6.54 mm; P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: As the result of an increased sensitivity for collateral flow, 4D-CTA temporal maximum intensity projection more closely outlines intracranial thrombi than conventional single-phase CT angiography. Our findings can be helpful when planning acute neurointervention. Further research is necessary to validate our data and assess the use of 4D-CTA in predicting response to different recanalization strategies.
Authors: Ewoud J Smit; Evert-jan Vonken; Irene C van der Schaaf; Adrienne M Mendrik; Jan Willem Dankbaar; Alexander D Horsch; Tom van Seeters; Bram van Ginneken; Mathias Prokop Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: N Sillanpää; J T Saarinen; H Rusanen; I Elovaara; P Dastidar; S Soimakallio Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J Gralla; M Burkhardt; G Schroth; M El-Koussy; M Reinert; K Nedeltchev; J Slotboom; C Brekenfeld Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Christian H Riedel; Ulf Jensen; Axel Rohr; Marc Tietke; Karsten Alfke; Stephan Ulmer; Olav Jansen Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Benjamin Pulli; Pamela W Schaefer; Reza Hakimelahi; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Michael H Lev; Joshua A Hirsch; R Gilberto González; Albert J Yoo Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J Puig; S Pedraza; A Demchuk; J Daunis-I-Estadella; H Termes; G Blasco; G Soria; I Boada; S Remollo; J Baños; J Serena; M Castellanos Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-12-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Volker Puetz; Imanuel Dzialowski; Michael D Hill; Suresh Subramaniam; P N Sylaja; Andrea Krol; Christine O'Reilly; Mark E Hudon; William Y Hu; Shelagh B Coutts; Philip A Barber; Timothy Watson; Jayanta Roy; Andrew M Demchuk Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: H A F Gratama van Andel; H W Venema; C B Majoie; G J Den Heeten; C A Grimbergen; G J Streekstra Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: K M Thierfelder; W H Sommer; B Ertl-Wagner; S E Beyer; F G Meinel; W G Kunz; G Buchholz; M F Reiser; H Janssen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T Struffert; Y Deuerling-Zheng; S Kloska; T Engelhorn; S Lang; A Mennecke; M Manhart; C M Strother; S Schwab; A Doerfler Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mina Park; Kyung-Eun Kim; Na-Young Shin; Seung-Koo Lee; Soo Mee Lim; Dongbeom Song; Ji Hoe Heo; Jin Woo Kim; Se Won Oh Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 5.315