Literature DB >> 18811738

Intracranial thrombus extent predicts clinical outcome, final infarct size and hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke: the clot burden score.

Volker Puetz1, Imanuel Dzialowski, Michael D Hill, Suresh Subramaniam, P N Sylaja, Andrea Krol, Christine O'Reilly, Mark E Hudon, William Y Hu, Shelagh B Coutts, Philip A Barber, Timothy Watson, Jayanta Roy, Andrew M Demchuk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In ischemic stroke, functional outcomes vary depending on site of intracranial occlusion. We tested the prognostic value of a semiquantitative computed tomography angiography-based clot burden score.
METHODS: Clot burden score allots major anterior circulation arteries 10 points for presence of contrast opacification on computed tomography angiography. Two points each are subtracted for thrombus preventing contrast opacification in the proximal M1, distal M1 or supraclinoid internal carotid artery and one point each for M2 branches, A1 and infraclinoid internal carotid artery. We retrospectively studied patients with disabling neurological deficits (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score >or=5) and computed tomography angiography within 24-hours from symptom onset. We analyzed percentages independent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score <or=2), final infarct Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score and parenchymal hematoma rates across categorized clot burden score groups and performed multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: We identified 263 patients (median age 73-years, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score 10, onset-to-computed tomography angiography time 165 min). Clot burden score<10 was associated with reduced odds of independent functional outcome (odds ratio 0.09 for clot burden score<or=5; odds ratio 0.22 for clot burden score 6-7; odds ratio 0.48 for clot burden score 8-9; all versus clot burden score 10; P<0.02 for all). Lower clot burden scores were associated with lower follow-up Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Scores (P<0.02 for all). Lower clot burden scores were associated with lower follow-up Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores (P<0.001) and higher parenchymal hematoma rates (P=0.008). Inter-rater reliability for clot burden score was 0.87 (lower 95% confidence interval 0.71) and intra-rater reliability 0.96 (lower 95% confidence interval 0.92).
CONCLUSION: The quantification of intracranial thrombus extent with the clot burden score predicts functional outcome, final infarct size and parenchymal hematoma risk acutely. The score needs external validation and could be useful for patient stratification in stroke trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18811738     DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2008.00221.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  90 in total

1.  Admission CT perfusion is an independent predictor of hemorrhagic transformation in acute stroke with similar accuracy to DWI.

Authors:  Leticia C S Souza; Seyedmehdi Payabvash; Yifei Wang; Shervin Kamalian; Pamela Schaefer; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Karen L Furie; Michael H Lev
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Location of the clot and outcome of perfusion defects in acute anterior circulation stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis.

Authors:  N Sillanpää; J T Saarinen; H Rusanen; I Elovaara; P Dastidar; S Soimakallio
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Brain imaging in acute ischemic stroke—MRI or CT?

Authors:  Heinrich J Audebert; Jochen B Fiebach
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Predictors of reperfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  A D Horsch; J W Dankbaar; J M Niesten; T van Seeters; I C van der Schaaf; Y van der Graaf; W P Th M Mali; B K Velthuis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Computed Tomography Perfusion Derived Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Does Not Yet Improve Prediction of Hemorrhagic Transformation.

Authors:  Alexander D Horsch; Edwin Bennink; Tom van Seeters; L Jaap Kappelle; Yolanda van der Graaf; Willem P T M Mali; Hugo W A M de Jong; Birgitta K Velthuis; Jan Willem Dankbaar
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 6.  Vascular imaging in stroke: comparative analysis.

Authors:  Kristian Barlinn; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Future trials of endovascular mechanical recanalisation therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients - a position paper endorsed by ESMINT and ESNR : part II: methodology of future trials.

Authors:  Jens Fiehler; Michael Söderman; Francis Turjman; Philip M White; Søren Jacob Bakke; Salvatore Mangiafico; Rüdiger von Kummer; Mario Muto; Christophe Cognard; Jan Gralla
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Sonothrombolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Guillaume Bouchoux; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Multi-center prediction of hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke using permeability imaging features.

Authors:  Fabien Scalzo; Jeffry R Alger; Xiao Hu; Jeffrey L Saver; Krishna A Dani; Keith W Muir; Andrew M Demchuk; Shelagh B Coutts; Marie Luby; Steven Warach; David S Liebeskind
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  CT angiography in an acute stroke protocol: correlation between occlusion site and outcome of intravenous thrombolysis.

Authors:  S Porelli; M Leonardi; A Stafa; C Barbara; G Procaccianti; L Simonetti
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 1.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.