Literature DB >> 35858444

Assortative mating enhances postzygotic barriers to gene flow via ancestry bundling.

Pavitra Muralidhar1,2, Graham Coop1,2, Carl Veller1,2.   

Abstract

Hybridization and subsequent genetic introgression are now known to be common features of the histories of many species, including our own. Following hybridization, selection often purges introgressed DNA genome-wide. While assortative mating can limit hybridization in the first place, it is also known to play an important role in postzygotic selection against hybrids and, thus, the purging of introgressed DNA. However, this role is usually thought of as a direct one: a tendency for mates to be conspecific reduces the sexual fitness of hybrids, reducing the transmission of introgressed ancestry. Here, we explore a second, indirect role of assortative mating as a postzygotic barrier to gene flow. Under assortative mating, parents covary in their ancestry, causing ancestry to be "bundled" in their offspring and later generations. This bundling effect increases ancestry variance in the population, enhancing the efficiency with which postzygotic selection purges introgressed DNA. Using whole-genome simulations, we show that the bundling effect can comprise a substantial portion of mate choice's overall effect as a postzygotic barrier to gene flow. We then derive a simple method for estimating the impact of the bundling effect from standard metrics of assortative mating. Applying this method to data from a diverse set of hybrid zones, we find that the bundling effect increases the purging of introgressed DNA by between 1.2-fold (in a baboon system with weak assortative mating) and 14-fold (in a swordtail system with strong assortative mating). Thus, assortative mating's bundling effect contributes substantially to the genetic isolation of species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assortative mating; introgression; mate choice; sexual selection; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35858444      PMCID: PMC9335313          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2122179119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  47 in total

1.  Population-genomic inference of the strength and timing of selection against gene flow.

Authors:  Simon Aeschbacher; Jessica P Selby; John H Willis; Graham Coop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Non-self recognition-based self-incompatibility can alternatively promote or prevent introgression.

Authors:  Alexander Harkness; Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  The Effects of Migration and Assortative Mating on Admixture Linkage Disequilibrium.

Authors:  Noah Zaitlen; Scott Huntsman; Donglei Hu; Melissa Spear; Celeste Eng; Sam S Oh; Marquitta J White; Angel Mak; Adam Davis; Kelly Meade; Emerita Brigino-Buenaventura; Michael A LeNoir; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Esteban G Burchard; Eran Halperin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Assortative mating and the maintenance of population structure in a natural hybrid zone.

Authors:  Zachary W Culumber; Olivia M Ochoa; Gil G Rosenthal
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Immigration and hybridization patterns of yellow and anubis baboons in and around Amboseli, Kenya.

Authors:  S C Alberts; J Altmann
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.371

6.  The Genetic Cost of Neanderthal Introgression.

Authors:  Kelley Harris; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Unidirectional spread of secondary sexual plumage traits across an avian hybrid zone.

Authors:  T J Parsons; S L Olson; M J Braun
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  SLiM 3: Forward Genetic Simulations Beyond the Wright-Fisher Model.

Authors:  Benjamin C Haller; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The many landscapes of recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron; Ramesh Ratnappan; Samuel Bailin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  High-resolution mapping reveals hundreds of genetic incompatibilities in hybridizing fish species.

Authors:  Molly Schumer; Rongfeng Cui; Daniel L Powell; Rebecca Dresner; Gil G Rosenthal; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.