Literature DB >> 23616896

Capturing information needs of care providers to support knowledge sharing and distributed decision making.

M Rogers1, L Zach, Y An, P Dalrymple.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This paper reports on work carried out to elicit information needs at a trans-disciplinary, nurse-managed health care clinic that serves a medically disadvantaged urban population. The trans-disciplinary model provides a "one-stop shop" for patients who can receive a wide range of services beyond traditional primary care. However, this model of health care presents knowledge sharing challenges because little is known about how data collected from the non-traditional services can be integrated into the traditional electronic medical record (EMR) and shared with other care providers. There is also little known about how health information technology (HIT) can be used to support the workflow in such a practice.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this case study was to identify the information needs of care providers in order to inform the design of HIT to support knowledge sharing and distributed decision making.
METHODS: A participatory design approach is presented as a successful technique to specify requirements for HIT applications that can support a trans-disciplinary model of care.
RESULTS: Using this design approach, the researchers identified the information needs of care providers working at the clinic and suggested HIT improvements to integrate non-traditional information into the EMR. These modifications allow knowledge sharing among care providers and support better health decisions.
CONCLUSIONS: We have identified information needs of care providers as they are relevant to the design of health information systems. As new technology is designed and integrated into various workflows it is clear that understanding information needs is crucial to acceptance of that technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Information needs; clinical information technology; nursing workflow; participatory design; provider-provider communications; requirements analysis and design

Year:  2012        PMID: 23616896      PMCID: PMC3613015          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2011-08-CR-0053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  25 in total

1.  The CISQ: a tool to measure staff involvement in and attitudes toward the implementation of a clinical information system.

Authors:  B Gugerty; P Wooldridge; M Brennan
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

2.  Computerized physician order entry: helpful or harmful?

Authors:  Robert G Berger; J P Kichak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records.

Authors:  David W Bates
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  What's in a name? Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary.

Authors:  Pamela H Mitchell
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Understanding nurses' information needs and searching behaviour in acute care settings.

Authors:  Xiaomin Xu; Roberto A Rocha; Sharon M Bigelow; Carrie J Wallace; Timothy Hanna; Lorrie K Roemer
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

6.  Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry.

Authors:  Joan S Ash; Dean F Sittig; Richard H Dykstra; Kenneth Guappone; James D Carpenter; Veena Seshadri
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Participatory design of a collaborative clinical trial protocol writing system.

Authors:  Chunhua Weng; David W McDonald; Dana Sparks; Jason McCoy; John H Gennari
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Supporting nurse decision making in primary care: exploring use of and attitude to decision tools.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Natasha Mitchell; Carl Thompson; Dorothy McCaughan; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study.

Authors:  Ruben Amarasingham; Laura Plantinga; Marie Diener-West; Darrell J Gaskin; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-01-26

10.  'Rage against the machine?': nurses' and midwives' experiences of using Computerized Patient Information Systems for clinical information.

Authors:  Philip Darbyshire
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.036

View more
  1 in total

1.  Provider Use of a Novel EHR display in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Large Customizable Interactive Monitor (LCIM).

Authors:  Onur Asan; Richard J Holden; Kathryn E Flynn; Yushi Yang; Laila Azam; Matthew C Scanlon
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.342

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.