Literature DB >> 19171805

Clinical information technologies and inpatient outcomes: a multiple hospital study.

Ruben Amarasingham1, Laura Plantinga, Marie Diener-West, Darrell J Gaskin, Neil R Powe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite speculation that clinical information technologies will improve clinical and financial outcomes, few studies have examined this relationship in a large number of hospitals.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of urban hospitals in Texas using the Clinical Information Technology Assessment Tool, which measures a hospital's level of automation based on physician interactions with the information system. After adjustment for potential confounders, we examined whether greater automation of hospital information was associated with reduced rates of inpatient mortality, complications, costs, and length of stay for 167 233 patients older than 50 years admitted to responding hospitals between December 1, 2005, and May 30, 2006.
RESULTS: We received a sufficient number of responses from 41 of 72 hospitals (58%). For all medical conditions studied, a 10-point increase in the automation of notes and records was associated with a 15% decrease in the adjusted odds of fatal hospitalizations (0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.97). Higher scores in order entry were associated with 9% and 55% decreases in the adjusted odds of death for myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass graft procedures, respectively. For all causes of hospitalization, higher scores in decision support were associated with a 16% decrease in the adjusted odds of complications (0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.90). Higher scores on test results, order entry, and decision support were associated with lower costs for all hospital admissions (-$110, -$132, and -$538, respectively; P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Hospitals with automated notes and records, order entry, and clinical decision support had fewer complications, lower mortality rates, and lower costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19171805     DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  91 in total

1.  Use of health information technology by office-based physicians: comparison of two contemporaneous public-use physician surveys.

Authors:  Chenghui Li
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2011-10-01

2.  Quantifying the impact of health IT implementations on clinical workflow: a new methodological perspective.

Authors:  Kai Zheng; Hilary M Haftel; Ronald B Hirschl; Michael O'Reilly; David A Hanauer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  A nationwide survey of trauma center information technology leverage capacity for mental health comorbidity screening.

Authors:  Erik G Van Eaton; Douglas F Zatzick; Thomas H Gallagher; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Frederick P Rivara; David R Flum; Roselyn Peterson; Ronald V Maier
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  A Randomized Trial of Voice-Generated Inpatient Progress Notes: Effects on Professional Fee Billing.

Authors:  Andrew A White; Tyler Lee; Michelle M Garrison; Thomas H Payne
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Collaboration Between Surgeons and Medical Oncologists and Outcomes for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Tanvir Hussain; Hsien-Yen Chang; Christine M Veenstra; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Quantifying clinical narrative redundancy in an electronic health record.

Authors:  Jesse O Wrenn; Daniel M Stein; Suzanne Bakken; Peter D Stetson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 7.  Precision diagnosis: a view of the clinical decision support systems (CDSS) landscape through the lens of critical care.

Authors:  Arnaud Belard; Timothy Buchman; Jonathan Forsberg; Benjamin K Potter; Christopher J Dente; Allan Kirk; Eric Elster
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Improving clinical quality indicators through electronic health records: it takes more than just a reminder.

Authors:  Dean F Sittig; Jonathan M Teich; Jerome A Osheroff; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Comparison of Time to Therapeutic aPTT in Patients Who Received Continuous Unfractionated Heparin After Implementation of Pharmacy-wide Intervention Alerts.

Authors:  Duaa Alsulaiman; Katelyn Sylvester; Craig Stevens; Danielle Carter
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-09

10.  Computerized decision support for the cardiovascular clinician: applications for venous thromboembolism prevention and beyond.

Authors:  Gregory Piazza; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.