BACKGROUND: Informal, unpaid, family caregivers provide much hospice care in the United States. These caregivers suffer physically, psychologically, emotionally, and socially from the burden of caring. The most often identified area of caregiver burden is the management of end-of-life pain. However, little empirical evidence exists of effective interventions to help caregivers manage end-of-life pain, and issues surrounding caregiver pain management remain vague and undefined. Understanding these concerns will inform the design of effective caregiver interventions. AIM: The purpose of this study was to describe and organize caregiver pain management challenges faced by home hospice caregivers of cancer patients. DESIGN: A content analysis of secondary data, namely, recordings of caregiver interviews, was conducted to describe pain management issues. These interviews were part of a larger clinical trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Multiple sessions with 29 informal caregivers, of patients dying of cancer, were audio-recorded. Subjects were purposively selected from two hospice programs in the Northwestern United States. Caregivers of noncancer patients were excluded from the study sample. RESULTS: A framework of six major themes with subordinate subthemes was developed through a literature review and peer review. The framework was used to organize the content of 87 caregiver interviews. The six major themes identified in the analysis included Caregiver-Centric Issues, Caregiver Medication Skills and Knowledge Issues, End-of-Life Symptom Knowledge Issues, Communication and Teamwork Issues, Organizational Skill Issues, and Patient-Centric Issues. CONCLUSION: This analysis clearly articulated and classified caregiver issues surrounding pain management. Future hospice research may benefit from the use of this analysis and framework in the development of tools to alleviate this major cause of caregiver burden.
BACKGROUND: Informal, unpaid, family caregivers provide much hospice care in the United States. These caregivers suffer physically, psychologically, emotionally, and socially from the burden of caring. The most often identified area of caregiver burden is the management of end-of-life pain. However, little empirical evidence exists of effective interventions to help caregivers manage end-of-life pain, and issues surrounding caregiver pain management remain vague and undefined. Understanding these concerns will inform the design of effective caregiver interventions. AIM: The purpose of this study was to describe and organize caregiver pain management challenges faced by home hospice caregivers of cancerpatients. DESIGN: A content analysis of secondary data, namely, recordings of caregiver interviews, was conducted to describe pain management issues. These interviews were part of a larger clinical trial. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Multiple sessions with 29 informal caregivers, of patients dying of cancer, were audio-recorded. Subjects were purposively selected from two hospice programs in the Northwestern United States. Caregivers of noncancer patients were excluded from the study sample. RESULTS: A framework of six major themes with subordinate subthemes was developed through a literature review and peer review. The framework was used to organize the content of 87 caregiver interviews. The six major themes identified in the analysis included Caregiver-Centric Issues, Caregiver Medication Skills and Knowledge Issues, End-of-Life Symptom Knowledge Issues, Communication and Teamwork Issues, Organizational Skill Issues, and Patient-Centric Issues. CONCLUSION: This analysis clearly articulated and classified caregiver issues surrounding pain management. Future hospice research may benefit from the use of this analysis and framework in the development of tools to alleviate this major cause of caregiver burden.
Entities:
Keywords:
Caregivers; end-of-life; hospice care; pain; pain management; palliative care
Authors: Denys T Lau; Rebecca Berman; Leslie Halpern; A Simon Pickard; Robert Schrauf; Whitney Witt Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Laurel L Northouse; Maria C Katapodi; Lixin Song; Lingling Zhang; Darlene W Mood Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2010-08-13 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Thomas J Smith; Sarah Temin; Erin R Alesi; Amy P Abernethy; Tracy A Balboni; Ethan M Basch; Betty R Ferrell; Matt Loscalzo; Diane E Meier; Judith A Paice; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Mark Somerfield; Ellen Stovall; Jamie H Von Roenn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nai-Ching Chi; George Demiris; Kenneth C Pike; Karla Washington; Debra Parker Oliver Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Robin Tarter; George Demiris; Kenneth Pike; Karla Washington; Debra Parker Oliver Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Sue Latter; Jane B Hopkinson; Alison Richardson; Jane A Hughes; Elizabeth Lowson; Deborah Edwards Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 3.568