Literature DB >> 22312101

American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: the integration of palliative care into standard oncology care.

Thomas J Smith1, Sarah Temin, Erin R Alesi, Amy P Abernethy, Tracy A Balboni, Ethan M Basch, Betty R Ferrell, Matt Loscalzo, Diane E Meier, Judith A Paice, Jeffrey M Peppercorn, Mark Somerfield, Ellen Stovall, Jamie H Von Roenn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (PCO) offers timely clinical direction to ASCO's membership following publication or presentation of potentially practice-changing data from major studies. This PCO addresses the integration of palliative care services into standard oncology practice at the time a person is diagnosed with metastatic or advanced cancer. CLINICAL CONTEXT: Palliative care is frequently misconstrued as synonymous with end-of-life care. Palliative care is focused on the relief of suffering, in all of its dimensions, throughout the course of a patient's illness. Although the use of hospice and other palliative care services at the end of life has increased, many patients are enrolled in hospice less than 3 weeks before their death, which limits the benefit they may gain from these services. By potentially improving quality of life (QOL), cost of care, and even survival in patients with metastatic cancer, palliative care has increasing relevance for the care of patients with cancer. Until recently, data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating the benefits of palliative care in patients with metastatic cancer who are also receiving standard oncology care have not been available. RECENT DATA: Seven published RCTs form the basis of this PCO. PROVISIONAL CLINICAL OPINION: Based on strong evidence from a phase III RCT, patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer should be offered concurrent palliative care and standard oncologic care at initial diagnosis. While a survival benefit from early involvement of palliative care has not yet been demonstrated in other oncology settings, substantial evidence demonstrates that palliative care-when combined with standard cancer care or as the main focus of care-leads to better patient and caregiver outcomes. These include improvement in symptoms, QOL, and patient satisfaction, with reduced caregiver burden. Earlier involvement of palliative care also leads to more appropriate referral to and use of hospice, and reduced use of futile intensive care. While evidence clarifying optimal delivery of palliative care to improve patient outcomes is evolving, no trials to date have demonstrated harm to patients and caregivers, or excessive costs, from early involvement of palliative care. Therefore, it is the Panel's expert consensus that combined standard oncology care and palliative care should be considered early in the course of illness for any patient with metastatic cancer and/or high symptom burden. Strategies to optimize concurrent palliative care and standard oncology care, with evaluation of its impact on important patient and caregiver outcomes (eg, QOL, survival, health care services utilization, and costs) and on society, should be an area of intense research. NOTE: ASCO's provisional clinical opinions (PCOs) reflect expert consensus based on clinical evidence and literature available at the time they are written and are intended to assist physicians in clinical decision making and identify questions and settings for further research. Because of the rapid flow of scientific information in oncology, new evidence may have emerged since the time a PCO was submitted for publication. PCOs are not continually updated and may not reflect the most recent evidence. PCOs cannot account for individual variation among patients and cannot be considered inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other treatments. It is the responsibility of the treating physician or other health care provider, relying on independent experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine the best course of treatment for the patient. Accordingly, adherence to any PCO is voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding its application to be made by the physician in light of each patient's individual circumstances. ASCO PCOs describe the use of procedures and therapies in clinical trials and cannot be assumed to apply to the use of these interventions in the context of clinical practice. ASCO assumes no responsibility for any injury or damage to persons or property arising out of or related to any use of ASCO's PCOs, or for any errors or omissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22312101     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  386 in total

1.  Palliative care: ASCO provisional clinical opinion.

Authors:  Mina Razzak
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Practical guidelines for developing new palliative care services: resource management.

Authors:  T J Smith; P J Coyne; J B Cassel
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Automatic referral to standardize palliative care access: an international Delphi survey.

Authors:  David Hui; Masanori Mori; Yee-Choon Meng; Sharon M Watanabe; Augusto Caraceni; Florian Strasser; Tiina Saarto; Nathan Cherny; Paul Glare; Stein Kaasa; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  End-of-Life Services Among Patients With Cancer: Evidence From Cancer Registry Records Linked With Commercial Health Insurance Claims.

Authors:  Cara L McDermott; Catherine Fedorenko; Karma Kreizenbeck; Qin Sun; Bruce Smith; J Randall Curtis; Ted Conklin; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Illness and end-of-life experiences of children with cancer who receive palliative care.

Authors:  Erica C Kaye; Courtney A Gushue; Samantha DeMarsh; Jonathan Jerkins; April Sykes; Zhaohua Lu; Jennifer M Snaman; Lindsay Blazin; Liza-Marie Johnson; Deena R Levine; R Ray Morrison; Justin N Baker
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  The Lake Wobegon effect: are all cancer patients above average?

Authors:  Jacqueline H Wolf; Kevin S Wolf
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Rural versus urban differences in end-of-life care for lung cancer patients in Germany.

Authors:  Julia Walter; Amanda Tufman; Reiner Leidl; Rolf Holle; Larissa Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Characteristics and outcomes of advanced cancer patients who miss outpatient supportive care consult appointments.

Authors:  Marvin Omar Delgado Guay; Marvin Omar Delgado Guay; Silvia Tanzi; Maria Teresa San Miguel Arregui; Maria Teresa San Miguel Arregui; Gary Chisholm; Maxine G De la Cruz; Maxine de la Cruz; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Characteristics and Outcomes of Ethics Consultations on a Comprehensive Cancer Center's Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Service.

Authors:  Virginia Corbett; Andrew S Epstein; Mary S McCabe
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2018-12

10.  Use of a Shared Mental Model by a Team Composed of Oncology, Palliative Care, and Supportive Care Clinicians to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in a Patient With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah F D'Ambruoso; Anne Coscarelli; Sara Hurvitz; Neil Wenger; David Coniglio; Dusty Donaldson; Christopher Pietras; Anne M Walling
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.