Literature DB >> 23607396

Expectation and entropy in spoken word recognition: effects of age and hearing acuity.

Amanda Lash1, Chad S Rogers, Amy Zoller, Arthur Wingfield.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/STUDY CONTEXT: Older adults, especially those with reduced hearing acuity, can make good use of linguistic context in word recognition. Less is known about the effects of the weighted distribution of probable target and nontarget words that fit the sentence context (response entropy). The present study examined the effects of age, hearing acuity, linguistic context, and response entropy on spoken word recognition.
METHODS: Participants were 18 older adults with good hearing acuity (M age = 74.3 years), 18 older adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss (M age = 76.1 years), and 18 young adults with age-normal hearing (M age = 19.6 years). Participants heard sentence-final words using a word-onset gating paradigm, in which words were heard with increasing amounts of onset information until they could be correctly identified. Degrees of context varied from a neutral context to a high context condition.
RESULTS: Older adults with poor hearing acuity required a greater amount of word onset information for recognition of words when heard in a neutral context compared with older adults with good hearing acuity and young adults. This difference progressively decreased with an increase in words' contextual probability. Unlike the young adults, both older adult groups' word recognition thresholds were sensitive to response entropy. Response entropy was not affected by hearing acuity.
CONCLUSION: Increasing linguistic context mitigates the negative effect of age and hearing loss on word recognition. The effect of response entropy on older adults' word recognition is discussed in terms of an age-related inhibition deficit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23607396      PMCID: PMC3668645          DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2013.779175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  43 in total

1.  Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  J R Dubno; J B Ahlstrom; A R Horwitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of age and hearing sensitivity on the use of prosodic information in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  A Wingfield; K C Lindfield; H Goodglass
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Effects of aging and noise on real-time spoken word recognition: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Boaz M Ben-David; Craig G Chambers; Meredyth Daneman; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Eyal M Reingold; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The effect of linguistic entropy on speech perception in noise in young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  J C van Rooij; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of gated, highly familiar spoken monosyllabic nouns by children, teenagers, and older adults.

Authors:  L L Elliott; M A Hammer; K E Evan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

6.  Effect of verbal context on latency of word selection.

Authors:  A M Treisman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

8.  The structure of the initial cohort: evidence from gating.

Authors:  L K Tyler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-11

9.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts.

Authors:  P A Bloom; I Fischler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-11

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more
  35 in total

1.  Lexical influences on competing speech perception in younger, middle-aged, and older adults.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus-independent semantic bias misdirects word recognition in older adults.

Authors:  Chad S Rogers; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Social Coordination in Older Adulthood: A Dual-Process Model.

Authors:  Meghan L Healey; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Effect of informational content of noise on speech representation in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Linguistic Context Versus Semantic Competition in Word Recognition by Younger and Older Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Nicole M Amichetti; Eriko Atagi; Ying-Yee Kong; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Semantic priming, not repetition priming, is to blame for false hearing.

Authors:  Chad S Rogers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

8.  Effects of Age, Acoustic Challenge, and Verbal Working Memory on Recall of Narrative Speech.

Authors:  Caitlin M Ward; Chad S Rogers; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Jenna Terpening; Angela C Costanzi; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.