Literature DB >> 23604175

Arthroscopic double-row repair of the rotator cuff: a comparison of bio-absorbable and non-resorbable anchors regarding osseous reaction.

Hendrik Haneveld1, Konstantin Hug, Gerd Diederichs, Markus Scheibel, Christian Gerhardt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse the osseous reaction after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair using bio-absorbable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) and non-absorbable polyetheretherketone (PEEK) suture anchors. Focus of interest was the appearance of peri-implant fluid and anchor tunnel widening.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients were evaluated at final follow-up (16 PLLA and 20 PEEK). Clinical results were acquired by use of the subjective shoulder value, the Constant score and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Radiological results were analysed by supraspinatus tendon integrity, footprint coverage, muscular atrophy and fatty infiltration. Furthermore, anchor tunnel expansion was measured, anchor structure and peri-implant fluids graduated.
RESULTS: At 28.4 ± 8.9-month follow-up, clinical outcome was similar (n.s.). MRI investigation revealed osseous reaction in both groups; tunnel widening was 0.9 ± 0.7 mm in PLLA and 0.8 ± 0.6 mm in PEEK anchors (n.s.). Peri-implant fluid was pronounced in PLLA anchors (p < 0.05). Tunnel widening was significantly higher in lateral anchors irrespectively of the material used. Tendon integrity, muscular atrophy, fatty infiltration and footprint coverage were not significantly different (n.s.).
CONCLUSION: Both materials lead to osseous reaction in this study, whereas consequences of pronounced fluid in PLLA patients remain unclear. Pronounced tunnel widening in lateral anchors leads to the assumption that other causes such as mechanical stress potentially have to be considered when analysing osseous reaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23604175     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2510-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  45 in total

Review 1.  Biodegradable implants in sports medicine: the biological base.

Authors:  A Weiler; R F Hoffmann; A C Stähelin; H J Helling; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Is the etiology of pretibial cyst formation after absorbable interference screw use related to a foreign body reaction?

Authors:  Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas; Ryan T Cassilly; Fabrizio Remotti; William N Levine
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Extensive osteolysis after rotator cuff repair with a bioabsorbable suture anchor: a case report.

Authors:  Dane Glueck; Timothy C Wilson; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Osteolysis and arthropathy of the shoulder after use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors. A report of four cases.

Authors:  George S Athwal; Shyam M Shridharani; Shawn W O'Driscoll
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors and associated accelerated shoulder arthropathy: report of 3 cases.

Authors:  Richard A Boden; Elizabeth Burgess; David Enion; Makaram S Srinivasan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Classification of rotator cuff lesions.

Authors:  D Patte
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained?

Authors:  Nam Su Cho; Bong Gun Lee; Yong Girl Rhee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Complications of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder.

Authors:  Aman Dhawan; Neil Ghodadra; Vasili Karas; Michael J Salata; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations.

Authors:  Stephan Pauly; Bettina Kieser; Alexander Schill; Christian Gerhardt; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Tissue restoration after resorption of polyglycolide and poly-laevo-lactic acid screws.

Authors:  O M Böstman; O M Laitinen; O Tynninen; S T Salminen; H K Pihlajamäki
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-11
View more
  11 in total

1.  Ultrasonic evaluation of the repair integrity can predict functional outcomes after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Johannes Barth; Elias Fotiadis; Renaud Barthelemy; Sophie Genna; Mo Saffarini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for the assessment of the rotator cuff after repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Complications after arthroscopic labral repair for shoulder instability.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsuki; Hiroyuki Sugaya
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

4.  Serial clinical and MRI examinations after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction using double-row technique.

Authors:  F Pfalzer; J Huth; E Stürmer; D Endele; B Kniesel; F Mauch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Biocomposite Suture Anchors Remain Visible Two Years After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Mirco Sgroi; Theresa Friesz; Michael Schocke; Heiko Reichel; Thomas Kappe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Are Knotted or Knotless Techniques Better for Reconstruction of Full-Thickness Tears of the Superior Portion of the Subscapularis Tendon? A Study in Cadavers.

Authors:  Mirco Sgroi; Thomas Kappe; Marius Ludwig; Michael Fuchs; Daniel Dornacher; Heiko Reichel; Anita Ignatius; Lutz Dürselen; Anne Seywald; Andreas Martin Seitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Perianchor Cyst Formation Is Similar Between All-Suture and Conventional Suture Anchors Used for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in the Same Shoulder.

Authors:  Elliott W Cole; Brian C Werner; Patrick J Denard
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 8.  Does Medial-Row Fixation Technique Affect the Retear Rate and Functional Outcomes After Double-Row Transosseous-Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair?

Authors:  Ameer M Elbuluk; Francesca R Coxe; Peter D Fabricant; Nicholas L Ramos; Michael J Alaia; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05-16

9.  Protocol for a Retrospective Comparative Study to Determine the Effect of Two Different Biocomposite Suture Anchors on the Occurrence of Bony Ingrowth and Implant Reabsorption Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Tanujan Thangarajah; Saho Tsuchiya; Ian K Lo
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2021-07-29

10.  Long-term follow-up of perianchor cyst formation after rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Douglas Matijakovich; David Solomon; Carlos L Benitez; Hsin-Hui Huang; Jashvant Poeran; Natalie Berger; Amir Lebaschi; Aruna Seneviratne
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.