Literature DB >> 28275819

Serial clinical and MRI examinations after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction using double-row technique.

F Pfalzer1, J Huth2, E Stürmer3, D Endele1, B Kniesel3, F Mauch1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rotator cuff reconstruction using arthroscopic double-row technique enables a better repair of the anatomical footprint at the tendon insertion. Objective of this serial study was to illustrate structural and functional results during recovery following double-row reconstruction.
METHODS: Forty-five patients with mid-sized ruptures of the supraspinatus tendon were assessed prospectively and underwent arthroscopic surgery using the double-row technique. Rupture localization, size, form, and extent of retraction were recorded intraoperatively. Clinical and MRI follow-up examinations were carried out for all patients after 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. A A standard protocol was used during the follow-up examinations to determine tendon integration, signal changes in the tendon, extent of bone marrow edema near the enclosed absorbable suture anchors, muscle changes. The clinical results were correlated with the MRI appearance.
RESULTS: After 26 weeks, the Constant score (CS) showed a highly significant increase for the first time with a value of 78 (p < 0.001). Tendon integration according to Sugaya showed a left shift over time, with higher CS-values for lower Sugaya classifications. Significant improvements in strength were first measured between the 26-week and 52-week follow-ups (9->19/p < 0.001). Highly significant improvement (p < 0.001) of the tendon signal and the fatty infiltration was found in the same time interval. The hypotrophy showed slight improvement, while a highly significant reduction of the bone marrow edema was found between weeks 12 and 26 (p < 0.001). There were no re-ruptures after week 26.
CONCLUSIONS: The present serial study showed that it took 26 weeks to reach a significant clinical improvement concerning CS. With regard to tendon healing, no further deterioration of the structural results occurred between week 26 and week 52 postoperative. There were slightly but not significant better clinical results according to the the Sugaya classification. However, parameter "strength" was significantly increased between weeks 26 and 52. This was consistent with a significant decrease in the signal intensity at the repaired tendon site, an additional improvement in the fatty infiltration, and the atrophy according to Thomazeau in the same time interval. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-row; MRI; Rotator cuff rupture; Serial; Tendon recovery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28275819     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4437-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Ian K Y Lo; Stephen S Burkhart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Clinical outcome and imaging of arthroscopic single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Hsiao-Li Ma; En-Rung Chiang; Hung-Ta H Wu; Shih-Chieh Hung; Shih-Tein Wang; Chien-Lin Liu; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Temporal evolution of MRI findings after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Julia Crim; Robert Burks; Betty J Manaster; Christopher Hanrahan; Man Hung; Patrick Greis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Peter J Millett; Carlos A Guanche; Stephen A Santangelo; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. Surgical technique.

Authors:  Laurent Lafosse; Roman Brzoska; Bruno Toussaint; Reuben Gobezie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Classification of rotator cuff lesions.

Authors:  D Patte
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears.

Authors:  Daniel Goutallier; Jean-Marie Postel; Pascal Gleyze; Pierre Leguilloux; Stéphane Van Driessche
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Robert T Burks; Julia Crim; Nick Brown; Barbara Fink; Patrick E Greis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus muscle after rotator cuff repair: an anatomic measure of outcome.

Authors:  Chris Hyunchul Jo; Ji Sun Shin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study.

Authors:  Joseph P Iannotti; Allen Deutsch; Andrew Green; Sally Rudicel; Jared Christensen; Shannon Marraffino; Scott Rodeo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  Agreement in rotator cuff muscles measurement between ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Ueda; Hiroshi Tanaka; Yoshiki Takeuchi; Takashi Tachibana; Hiroaki Inui; Katsuya Nobuhara; Jun Umehara; Noriaki Ichihashi
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2022-03-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.