Literature DB >> 21856927

Complications of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder.

Aman Dhawan1, Neil Ghodadra, Vasili Karas, Michael J Salata, Brian J Cole.   

Abstract

The development of the suture anchor has played a pivotal role in the transition from open to arthroscopic techniques of the shoulder. Various suture anchors have been manufactured that help facilitate the ability to create a soft tissue to bone repair. Because of reported complications of loosening, migration, and chondral injury with metallic anchors, bioabsorbable anchors have become increasingly used among orthopaedic surgeons. In this review, the authors sought to evaluate complications associated with bioabsorbable anchors in or about the shoulder and understand these in the context of the total number of bioabsorbable anchors placed. In 2008, 10 bioabsorbable anchor-related complications were reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. The reported literature complications of bioabsorbable anchors implanted about the shoulder include glenoid osteolysis, synovitis, and chondrolysis. These potential complications should be kept in mind when forming a differential diagnosis in a patient in whom a bioabsorbable anchor has been previously used. These literature reports, which amount to but a fraction of the total bioabsorbable anchors implanted in the shoulder on a yearly basis, underscore the relative safety and successful clinical results with use of bioabsorbable suture anchors. Product development continues with newer composites such as PEEK (polyetheretherketone) and calcium ceramics (tricalcium phosphate) in an effort to hypothetically create a mechanically stable construct with and improve biocompatibility of the implant. Bioabsorbable anchors remain a safe, reproducible, and consistent implant to secure soft tissue to bone in and about the shoulder. Meticulous insertion technique must be followed in using bioabsorbable anchors and may obviate many of the reported complications found in the literature. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the existing literature as it relates to the rare complications seen with use of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21856927     DOI: 10.1177/0363546511417573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  39 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Biocomposite Suture Anchors Remain Visible Two Years After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Xavier Ampuero Duralde
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Arthroscopic double-row repair of the rotator cuff: a comparison of bio-absorbable and non-resorbable anchors regarding osseous reaction.

Authors:  Hendrik Haneveld; Konstantin Hug; Gerd Diederichs; Markus Scheibel; Christian Gerhardt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Pullout strength of all suture anchors in the repair of rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Alexandre Galland; Stéphane Airaudi; Renaud Gravier; Sophie Le Cann; Patrick Chabrand; Jean-Noël Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Arthroscopic remplissage with all-suture anchors causes cystic lesions in the humerus: a volumetric CT study of 55 anchors.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Rosa Vega Rodriguez; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Roque Pérez Expósito; Irene Zarcos Paredes; Jorge Diaz Heredia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Glenoid rim fracture through anchor points after arthroscopic Bankart repair for shoulder instability.

Authors:  Jin-Young Park; Seung-Jun Lee; Se-Kwan Oh; KyungSoo Oh; YoungMin Noh; Kuen-Tak Suh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Biocomposite Suture Anchors Remain Visible Two Years After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  Mirco Sgroi; Theresa Friesz; Michael Schocke; Heiko Reichel; Thomas Kappe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Foreign-Body Reaction and Osteolysis in Dorsal Lunate Dislocation Repair With Bioabsorbable Suture Anchor.

Authors:  Ezequiel Ernesto Zaidenberg; Pablo Roitman; Gerardo Luis Gallucci; Jorge Guillermo Boretto; Pablo De Carli
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-10

8.  Anterior glenoid perforation with suture anchor causing subscapularis irritation and pain.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Lana Verkuil; Sean Wilson; Li Foong Foo
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-06-21

Review 9.  Superior labrum anterior to posterior lesions of the shoulder: Diagnosis and arthroscopic management.

Authors:  Nuri Aydin; Evrim Sirin; Alp Arya
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

Review 10.  Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for the Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability: Indications and Outcomes.

Authors:  Steven DeFroda; Steven Bokshan; Evan Stern; Kayleigh Sullivan; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.