Literature DB >> 30259989

CA19-9 and apolipoprotein-A2 isoforms as detection markers for pancreatic cancer: a prospective evaluation.

Kazufumi Honda1,2, Verena A Katzke3, Anika Hüsing3, Shinobu Okaya1, Hirokazu Shoji1,4, Kaoru Onidani1, Anja Olsen5, Anne Tjønneland5, Kim Overvad6, Elisabete Weiderpass7,8,9,10, Paolo Vineis11, David Muller11, Kostas Tsilidis11,12, Domenico Palli13, Valeria Pala14, Rosario Tumino15, Alessio Naccarati16, Salvatore Panico17, Krasimira Aleksandrova18, Heiner Boeing18, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita19,20,11,21, Petra H Peeters22,23, Antonia Trichopoulou24, Pagona Lagiou25, Kay-Tee Khaw26, Nick Wareham27, Ruth C Travis28, Susana Merino29, Eric J Duell30, Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco31,32, María Dolores Chirlaque33, Aurelio Barricarte32,34,35, Vinciane Rebours36,37, Marie-Chiristine Boutron-Ruault38,39, Francesca Romana Mancini37,38, Paul Brennan40, Ghislaine Scelo40, Jonas Manjer41, Malin Sund42, Daniel Öhlund43, Federico Canzian44, Rudolf Kaaks3.   

Abstract

Recently, we identified unique processing patterns of apolipoprotein A2 (ApoA2) in patients with pancreatic cancer. Our study provides a first prospective evaluation of an ApoA2 isoform ("ApoA2-ATQ/AT"), alone and in combination with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), as an early detection biomarker for pancreatic cancer. We performed ELISA measurements of CA19-9 and ApoA2-ATQ/AT in 156 patients with pancreatic cancer and 217 matched controls within the European EPIC cohort, using plasma samples collected up to 60 months prior to diagnosis. The detection discrimination statistics were calculated for risk scores by strata of lag-time. For CA19-9, in univariate marker analyses, C-statistics to distinguish future pancreatic cancer patients from cancer-free individuals were 0.80 for plasma taken ≤6 months before diagnosis, and 0.71 for >6-18 months; for ApoA2-ATQ/AT, C-statistics were 0.62, and 0.65, respectively. Joint models based on ApoA2-ATQ/AT plus CA19-9 significantly improved discrimination within >6-18 months (C = 0.74 vs. 0.71 for CA19-9 alone, p = 0.022) and ≤ 18 months (C = 0.75 vs. 0.74, p = 0.022). At 98% specificity, and for lag times of ≤6, >6-18 or ≤ 18 months, sensitivities were 57%, 36% and 43% for CA19-9 combined with ApoA2-ATQ/AT, respectively, vs. 50%, 29% and 36% for CA19-9 alone. Compared to CA19-9 alone, the combination of CA19-9 and ApoA2-ATQ/AT may improve detection of pancreatic cancer up to 18 months prior to diagnosis under usual care, and may provide a useful first measure for pancreatic cancer detection prior to imaging.
© 2018 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CA19-9; apolipoprotein A2; early detection; isoforms; pancreatic cancer; prospective study

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30259989      PMCID: PMC6760974          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  28 in total

1.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Perioperative CA19-9 levels can predict stage and survival in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Dianne M Finkelstein; Sarah P Thayer; Alona Muzikansky; Carlos Fernandez-delCastillo; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Possible detection of pancreatic cancer by plasma protein profiling.

Authors:  Kazufumi Honda; Yasuharu Hayashida; Tomoko Umaki; Takuji Okusaka; Tomoo Kosuge; Satoru Kikuchi; Mitsufumi Endo; Akihiko Tsuchida; Tatsuya Aoki; Takao Itoi; Fuminori Moriyasu; Setsuo Hirohashi; Tesshi Yamada
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Vagaries of clinical presentation of pancreatic and biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  I Modolell; L Guarner; J R Malagelada
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  The clinical utility of the CA 19-9 tumor-associated antigen.

Authors:  W Steinberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Serum CA 19-9 as a Biomarker for Pancreatic Cancer-A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Umashankar K Ballehaninna; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-17

Review 7.  Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM) status report.

Authors:  M J Duffy; C Sturgeon; R Lamerz; C Haglund; V L Holubec; R Klapdor; A Nicolini; O Topolcan; V Heinemann
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 8.  Diet and cancer--the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.

Authors:  Sheila Bingham; Elio Riboli
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Survival in pancreatic carcinoma based on tumor size.

Authors:  Banke Agarwal; Arlene M Correa; Linus Ho
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection.

Authors:  E Riboli; K J Hunt; N Slimani; P Ferrari; T Norat; M Fahey; U R Charrondière; B Hémon; C Casagrande; J Vignat; K Overvad; A Tjønneland; F Clavel-Chapelon; A Thiébaut; J Wahrendorf; H Boeing; D Trichopoulos; A Trichopoulou; P Vineis; D Palli; H B Bueno-De-Mesquita; P H M Peeters; E Lund; D Engeset; C A González; A Barricarte; G Berglund; G Hallmans; N E Day; T J Key; R Kaaks; R Saracci
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.022

View more
  15 in total

1.  Predictors of postoperative early recurrence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Masayuki Akita; Tetsuo Ajiki; Kimihiko Ueno; Daisuke Tsugawa; Yu Hashimoto; Motofumi Tanaka; Masahiro Kido; Hirochika Toyama; Takumi Fukumoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Lead-Time Trajectory of CA19-9 as an Anchor Marker for Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection.

Authors:  Johannes F Fahrmann; C Max Schmidt; Xiangying Mao; Ehsan Irajizad; Maureen Loftus; Jinming Zhang; Nikul Patel; Jody Vykoukal; Jennifer B Dennison; James P Long; Kim-Anh Do; Jianjun Zhang; John A Chabot; Michael D Kluger; Fay Kastrinos; Lauren Brais; Ana Babic; Kunal Jajoo; Linda S Lee; Thomas E Clancy; Kimmie Ng; Andrea Bullock; Jeanine Genkinger; Michele T Yip-Schneider; Anirban Maitra; Brian M Wolpin; Samir Hanash
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Clinical application of thioredoxin reductase as a novel biomarker in liver cancer.

Authors:  Xuping Wu; Qi Wang; Yousheng Lu; Jinye Zhang; Hanwei Yin; Yongxiang Yi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Inflammatory cytokines and combined biomarker panels in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Deirdré Kruger; Yandiswa Y Yako; John Devar; Nicola Lahoud; Martin Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Identifying Novel Biomarkers Ready for Evaluation in Low-Prevalence Populations for the Early Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Natalia Calanzani; Paige E Druce; Claudia Snudden; Kristi M Milley; Rachel Boscott; Dawnya Behiyat; Smiji Saji; Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez; Jasmeen Oberoi; Garth Funston; Mike Messenger; Jon Emery; Fiona M Walter
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  A combination of urinary biomarker panel and PancRISK score for earlier detection of pancreatic cancer: A case-control study.

Authors:  Silvana Debernardi; Harrison O'Brien; Asma S Algahmdi; Nuria Malats; Grant D Stewart; Marija Plješa-Ercegovac; Eithne Costello; William Greenhalf; Amina Saad; Rhiannon Roberts; Alexander Ney; Stephen P Pereira; Hemant M Kocher; Stephen Duffy; Oleg Blyuss; Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Organoid-Transplant Model Systems to Study the Effects of Obesity on the Pancreatic Carcinogenesis in vivo.

Authors:  Francesca Lupo; Geny Piro; Lorena Torroni; Pietro Delfino; Rosalinda Trovato; Borislav Rusev; Alessandra Fiore; Dea Filippini; Francesco De Sanctis; Marcello Manfredi; Emilio Marengo; Rita Teresa Lawlor; Maurizio Martini; Giampaolo Tortora; Stefano Ugel; Vincenzo Corbo; Davide Melisi; Carmine Carbone
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-04-28

8.  Predicting Selection Preference of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) in a Chinese Single Center Population: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram.

Authors:  Zhen Huo; Zhihao Shi; Shuyu Zhai; Jingfeng Li; Hao Qian; Xiaomei Tang; Yuanchi Weng; Yusheng Shi; Liwen Wang; Yue Wang; Xiaxing Deng; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-10-26

9.  Prospective Study Using Plasma Apolipoprotein A2-Isoforms to Screen for High-Risk Status of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Yu Sato; Takashi Kobayashi; Shin Nishiumi; Akihiko Okada; Tsuyoshi Fujita; Tsuyoshi Sanuki; Masao Kobayashi; Masakyo Asahara; Masayasu Adachi; Arata Sakai; Hideyuki Shiomi; Atsuhiro Masuda; Masaru Yoshida; Keiko Takeuchi; Yuzo Kodama; Hiromu Kutsumi; Kengo Nagashima; Kazufumi Honda
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Apolipoprotein A2 Isoforms in Relation to the Risk of Myocardial Infarction: A Nested Case-Control Analysis in the JPHC Study.

Authors:  Tomomi Kihara; Kazumasa Yamagishi; Kazufumi Honda; Ai Ikeda; Hiroshi Yatsuya; Isao Saito; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Taiki Yamaji; Taichi Shimazu; Norie Sawada; Motoki Iwasaki; Hiroyasu Iso; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 4.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.