Yeyi Zhu1,2, Michael Y Tsai3, Qi Sun4, Stefanie N Hinkle2, Shristi Rawal2,5, Pauline Mendola2, Assiamira Ferrara1, Paul S Albert2,6, Cuilin Zhang2. 1. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA. 2. Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 4. Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 5. Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ. 6. Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Abstract
Background: Data on saturated fatty acids (SFAs) in relation to metabolic function and glucose homeostasis remain controversial. Such data are lacking among pregnant women. Objective: We prospectively investigated objectively measured individual and subclasses of plasma phospholipid SFAs throughout pregnancy in relation to cardiometabolic markers and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk. Design: Within the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies-Singleton Cohort of 2802 singleton pregnancies, 107 GDM cases were ascertained via medical record review and matched to 214 non-GDM controls on age, race/ethnicity, and gestational week (GW) at blood collection. Individual plasma phospholipid SFA concentrations were repeatedly measured throughout pregnancy at GWs 10-14, 15-26, 23-31, and 33-39 and also grouped into subclasses of even- or odd-chain SFAs. Results: From GW 10, even-chain SFA concentrations were significantly higher among women who later developed GDM, whereas odd-chain SFAs were significantly lower among GDM cases compared with controls. At GWs 10-14, the SFA palmitic acid (16:0) was positively associated with impaired insulin resistance and cardiometabolic markers and the risk of GDM [adjusted OR comparing the highest with the lowest quartile (aORQ4-Q1): 4.76; 95% CI: 1.72, 13.10; P-trend = 0.001]. In contrast, odd-chain SFAs were inversely related to the previously mentioned markers and GDM risk [aORQ4-Q1 for pentadecanoic acid (15:0): 0.32; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.92; P-trend = 0.025; for heptadecanoic acid (17:0): 0.20; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.58; P-trend = 0.003]. Women with high (median or greater) even-chain SFA concentrations and low (less than median) odd-chain SFAs had a 9.43-fold (95%: CI 3.26-, 27.30-fold) increased risk compared with women with low even-chain and high odd-chain SFA concentrations. Similar results were observed at GWs 15-26. Conclusions: The study provided one of the first lines of evidence suggesting that circulating concentrations of SFAs varying by SFA chain length, as early as GWs 10-14, were significantly and differentially associated with subsequent risk of GDM. Our findings highlight the importance of assessing objectively measured, individual, and subclasses of SFAs to investigate their distinct biological and pathophysiologic roles in glucose homeostasis and cardiometabolic outcomes. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00912132.
Background: Data on saturated fatty acids (SFAs) in relation to metabolic function and glucose homeostasis remain controversial. Such data are lacking among pregnant women. Objective: We prospectively investigated objectively measured individual and subclasses of plasma phospholipid SFAs throughout pregnancy in relation to cardiometabolic markers and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk. Design: Within the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies-Singleton Cohort of 2802 singleton pregnancies, 107 GDM cases were ascertained via medical record review and matched to 214 non-GDM controls on age, race/ethnicity, and gestational week (GW) at blood collection. Individual plasma phospholipidSFA concentrations were repeatedly measured throughout pregnancy at GWs 10-14, 15-26, 23-31, and 33-39 and also grouped into subclasses of even- or odd-chain SFAs. Results: From GW 10, even-chain SFA concentrations were significantly higher among women who later developed GDM, whereas odd-chain SFAs were significantly lower among GDM cases compared with controls. At GWs 10-14, the SFApalmitic acid (16:0) was positively associated with impaired insulin resistance and cardiometabolic markers and the risk of GDM [adjusted OR comparing the highest with the lowest quartile (aORQ4-Q1): 4.76; 95% CI: 1.72, 13.10; P-trend = 0.001]. In contrast, odd-chain SFAs were inversely related to the previously mentioned markers and GDM risk [aORQ4-Q1 for pentadecanoic acid (15:0): 0.32; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.92; P-trend = 0.025; for heptadecanoic acid (17:0): 0.20; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.58; P-trend = 0.003]. Women with high (median or greater) even-chain SFA concentrations and low (less than median) odd-chain SFAs had a 9.43-fold (95%: CI 3.26-, 27.30-fold) increased risk compared with women with low even-chain and high odd-chain SFA concentrations. Similar results were observed at GWs 15-26. Conclusions: The study provided one of the first lines of evidence suggesting that circulating concentrations of SFAs varying by SFA chain length, as early as GWs 10-14, were significantly and differentially associated with subsequent risk of GDM. Our findings highlight the importance of assessing objectively measured, individual, and subclasses of SFAs to investigate their distinct biological and pathophysiologic roles in glucose homeostasis and cardiometabolic outcomes. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00912132.
Authors: Ingrid D Santaren; Steven M Watkins; Angela D Liese; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Marian J Rewers; Steven M Haffner; Carlos Lorenzo; Anthony J Hanley Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Zoë Harcombe; Julien S Baker; Stephen Mark Cooper; Bruce Davies; Nicholas Sculthorpe; James J DiNicolantonio; Fergal Grace Journal: Open Heart Date: 2015-01-29
Authors: Nita G Forouhi; Albert Koulman; Stephen J Sharp; Fumiaki Imamura; Janine Kröger; Matthias B Schulze; Francesca L Crowe; José María Huerta; Marcela Guevara; Joline W J Beulens; Geertruida J van Woudenbergh; Laura Wang; Keith Summerhill; Julian L Griffin; Edith J M Feskens; Pilar Amiano; Heiner Boeing; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Laureen Dartois; Guy Fagherazzi; Paul W Franks; Carlos Gonzalez; Marianne Uhre Jakobsen; Rudolf Kaaks; Timothy J Key; Kay-Tee Khaw; Tilman Kühn; Amalia Mattiello; Peter M Nilsson; Kim Overvad; Valeria Pala; Domenico Palli; J Ramón Quirós; Olov Rolandsson; Nina Roswall; Carlotta Sacerdote; María-José Sánchez; Nadia Slimani; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Anne Tjonneland; Maria-José Tormo; Rosario Tumino; Daphne L van der A; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Claudia Langenberg; Elio Riboli; Nicholas J Wareham Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Juan Xavier Masjoan Juncos; Shazia Shakil; Aamir Ahmad; Duha Aishah; Charity J Morgan; Louis J Dell'Italia; David A Ford; Aftab Ahmad; Shama Ahmad Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Yeyi Zhu; Mengying Li; Mohammad L Rahman; Stefanie N Hinkle; Jing Wu; Natalie L Weir; Yuan Lin; Huixia Yang; Michael Y Tsai; Assiamira Ferrara; Cuilin Zhang Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jingjing Jiao; Suet-Ying Kwan; Caroline M Sabotta; Honami Tanaka; Lucas Veillon; Marc O Warmoes; Philip L Lorenzi; Ying Wang; Peng Wei; Ernest T Hawk; Jose Luis Almeda; Joseph B McCormick; Susan P Fisher-Hoch; Laura Beretta Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Seung Mi Lee; Yujin Kang; Eun Mi Lee; Young Mi Jung; Subeen Hong; Soo Jin Park; Chan-Wook Park; Errol R Norwitz; Do Yup Lee; Joong Shin Park Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Susanna D Mitro; Jing Wu; Mohammad L Rahman; Yaqi Cao; Yeyi Zhu; Zhen Chen; Liwei Chen; Mengying Li; Stefanie N Hinkle; Andrew A Bremer; Natalie L Weir; Michael Y Tsai; Yiqing Song; Katherine L Grantz; Bizu Gelaye; Cuilin Zhang Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Emily Wang; Yeyi Zhu; Rana F Chehab; Jing Wu; Stefanie N Hinkle; Natalie L Weir; Andrew A Bremer; Jiaxi Yang; Zhen Chen; Michael Y Tsai; Cuilin Zhang Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 5.717