Literature DB >> 30467878

Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in matched case control studies.

Hui Xu1, Jing Qian1, Nina P Paynter2, Xuehong Zhang2, Brian W Whitcomb1, Shelley S Tworoger3, Kathryn M Rexrode2, Susan E Hankinson1, Raji Balasubramanian1.   

Abstract

The matched case-control design is frequently used in the study of complex disorders and can result in significant gains in efficiency, especially in the context of measuring biomarkers; however, risk prediction in this setting is not straightforward. We propose an inverse-probability weighting approach to estimate the predictive ability associated with a set of covariates. In particular, we propose an algorithm for estimating the summary index, area under the curve corresponding to the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve associated with a set of pre-defined covariates for predicting a binary outcome. By combining data from the parent cohort with that generated in a matched case control study, we describe methods for estimation of the population parameters of interest and the corresponding area under the curve. We evaluate the bias associated with the proposed methods in simulations by considering a range of parameter settings. We illustrate the methods in two data applications: (1) a prospective cohort study of cardiovascular disease in women, the Women's Health Study, and (2) a matched case-control study nested within the Nurses' Health Study aimed at risk prediction of invasive breast cancer.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; biomarker discovery; inverse probability weighting; matched case control studies; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30467878      PMCID: PMC6768691          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  21 in total

1.  Why match? Investigating matched case-control study designs with causal effect estimation.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Assessment of biomarkers for risk prediction with nested case-control studies.

Authors:  Qian M Zhou; Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Adding tests to risk based guidelines: evaluating improvements in prediction for an intermediate risk group.

Authors:  Nina P Paynter; Nancy R Cook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-09-07

4.  Matching in epidemiologic studies: validity and efficiency considerations.

Authors:  L L Kupper; J M Karon; D G Kleinbaum; H Morgenstern; D K Lewis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Inclusion of endogenous hormone levels in risk prediction models of postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Shelley S Tworoger; Xuehong Zhang; A Heather Eliassen; Jing Qian; Graham A Colditz; Walter C Willett; Bernard A Rosner; Peter Kraft; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker; Nancy R Cook; I-Min Lee; David Gordon; J Michael Gaziano; Joann E Manson; Charles H Hennekens; Julie E Buring
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Breast cancer risk prediction with a log-incidence model: evaluation of accuracy.

Authors:  Beverly Rockhill; Celia Byrne; Bernard Rosner; Mary M Louie; Graham Colditz
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Postmenopausal plasma sex hormone levels and breast cancer risk over 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Xuehong Zhang; Shelley S Tworoger; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Alcohol, height, and adiposity in relation to estrogen and prolactin levels in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S E Hankinson; W C Willett; J E Manson; D J Hunter; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; C Longcope; F E Speizer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of 11C-Pittsburgh Compound B and 18F-Flutemetamol White Matter Binding in PET.

Authors:  Burcu Zeydan; Christopher G Schwarz; Scott A Przybelski; Timothy G Lesnick; Walter K Kremers; Matthew L Senjem; Orhun H Kantarci; Paul H Min; Bradley J Kemp; Clifford R Jack; Kejal Kantarci; Val J Lowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 11.082

2.  Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from administrative data: A population-based cohort study from Italy.

Authors:  Valentina Orlando; Federico Rea; Laura Savaré; Ilaria Guarino; Sara Mucherino; Alessandro Perrella; Ugo Trama; Enrico Coscioni; Enrica Menditto; Giovanni Corrao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.