Literature DB >> 23597291

"Thinking on your feet": A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace.

Anne Carolyn Grunseit1, Josephine Yuk-Yin Chau, Hidde Pieter van der Ploeg, Adrian Bauman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological research has established sitting as a new risk factor for the development of non-communicable chronic disease. Sit-stand desks have been proposed as one strategy to reduce occupational sedentary time. This formative research study evaluated the acceptability and usability of manually and electrically operated sit-stand desks in a medium-sized government organisation located in Sydney, Australia.
METHODS: Sitting time pre- and three months post -installation of the sit-stand desks was measured using validated self-report measures. Additionally, three group interviews and one key-informant interview were conducted with staff regarding perceptions about ease of, and barriers to, use and satisfaction with the sit-stand desks. All interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed for themes regarding usability and acceptability.
RESULTS: Of 31 staff, 18 completed baseline questionnaires, and 13 completed follow-up questionnaires. The median proportion of sitting time for work was 85% (range 50%-95%) at baseline and 60% (range 10%-95%) at follow-up. Formal statistical testing of paired data (n=11) showed that the change from baseline to follow-up in time spent sitting (mean change=1.7 hours, p=.014) was statistically significant. From the qualitative data, reasons given for initiating use of the desks in the standing position were the potential health benefits, or a willingness to experiment or through external prompting. Factors influencing continued use included: concern for, and experience of, short and long term health impacts; perceived productivity whilst sitting and standing; practical accommodation of transitions between sitting and standing; electric or manual operation height adjustment. Several trajectories in patterns of initiation and continued use were identified that centered on the source and timing of commitment to using the desk in the standing position.
CONCLUSIONS: Sit-stand desks had high usability and acceptability and reduced sitting time at work. Use could be promoted by emphasizing the health benefits, providing guidance on appropriate set-up and normalizing standing for work-related tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23597291      PMCID: PMC3643835          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  20 in total

Review 1.  Are workplace interventions to reduce sitting effective? A systematic review.

Authors:  Josephine Y Chau; Hidde P van der Ploeg; Jannique G Z van Uffelen; Jason Wong; Ingrid Riphagen; Genevieve N Healy; Nicholas D Gilson; David W Dunstan; Adrian E Bauman; Neville Owen; Wendy J Brown
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Occupational sitting and health risks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jannique G Z van Uffelen; Jason Wong; Josephine Y Chau; Hidde P van der Ploeg; Ingrid Riphagen; Nicholas D Gilson; Nicola W Burton; Genevieve N Healy; Alicia A Thorp; Bronwyn K Clark; Paul A Gardiner; David W Dunstan; Adrian Bauman; Neville Owen; Wendy J Brown
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk.

Authors:  Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Jo Salmon; Ester Cerin; Jonathan E Shaw; Paul Z Zimmet; Neville Owen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Effects of adjustable sit-stand VDT workstations on workers' musculoskeletal discomfort, alertness and performance.

Authors:  Takeshi Ebara; Tomohide Kubo; Tatsuki Inoue; Gen-i Murasaki; Hidemaro Takeyama; Tomoaki Sato; Hatsuko Suzumura; Sayuri Niwa; Toshimasa Takanishi; Norihide Tachi; Toru Itani
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Comparisons of musculoskeletal complaints and data entry between a sitting and a sit-stand workstation paradigm.

Authors:  Britta Husemann; Carolin Yvonne Von Mach; Daniel Borsotto; Kirsten Isabel Zepf; Jutta Scharnbacher
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Identifying the energy gap: magnitude and determinants of 5-year weight gain in midage women.

Authors:  Wendy J Brown; Lauren Williams; Jessica H Ford; Kylie Ball; Annette J Dobson
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-08

Review 7.  The health and cost benefits of work site health-promotion programs.

Authors:  Ron Z Goetzel; Ronald J Ozminkowski
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.

Authors:  Peter T Katzmarzyk; Timothy S Church; Cora L Craig; Claude Bouchard
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Reducing occupational sitting time and improving worker health: the Take-a-Stand Project, 2011.

Authors:  Nicolaas P Pronk; Abigail S Katz; Marcia Lowry; Jane Rodmyre Payfer
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  The introduction of sit-stand worktables; aspects of attitudes, compliance and satisfaction.

Authors:  Stephen Wilks; Monica Mortimer; Per Nylén
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 3.940

View more
  35 in total

1.  Deviation between self-reported and measured occupational physical activity levels in office employees: effects of age and body composition.

Authors:  Katharina Wick; Oliver Faude; Susanne Schwager; Lukas Zahner; Lars Donath
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Active workstations to fight sedentary behaviour.

Authors:  Tine Torbeyns; Stephen Bailey; Inge Bos; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The user and non-user perspective: Experiences of office workers with long-term access to sit-stand workstations.

Authors:  Lidewij R Renaud; Erwin M Speklé; Allard J van der Beek; Hidde P van der Ploeg; H Roeline Pasman; Maaike A Huysmans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The impact of standing desks on cardiometabolic and vascular health.

Authors:  Ariel Bodker; Alexis Visotcky; David Gutterman; Michael E Widlansky; Jacquelyn Kulinski
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Repetitive daily point of choice prompts and occupational sit-stand transfers, concentration and neuromuscular performance in office workers: an RCT.

Authors:  Lars Donath; Oliver Faude; Yannick Schefer; Ralf Roth; Lukas Zahner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The effectiveness of sit-stand workstations for changing office workers' sitting time: results from the Stand@Work randomized controlled trial pilot.

Authors:  Josephine Y Chau; Michelle Daley; Scott Dunn; Anu Srinivasan; Anna Do; Adrian E Bauman; Hidde P van der Ploeg
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Installation of a stationary high desk in the workplace: effect of a 6-week intervention on physical activity.

Authors:  Motohiko Miyachi; Satoshi Kurita; Julien Tripette; Ryo Takahara; Yoshiko Yagi; Haruka Murakami
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lee E F Graves; Rebecca C Murphy; Sam O Shepherd; Josephine Cabot; Nicola D Hopkins
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Iterative development of Stand Up Australia: a multi-component intervention to reduce workplace sitting.

Authors:  Maike Neuhaus; Genevieve N Healy; Brianna S Fjeldsoe; Sheleigh Lawler; Neville Owen; David W Dunstan; Anthony D LaMontagne; Elizabeth G Eakin
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Desk-based workers' perspectives on using sit-stand workstations: a qualitative analysis of the Stand@Work study.

Authors:  Josephine Y Chau; Michelle Daley; Anu Srinivasan; Scott Dunn; Adrian E Bauman; Hidde P van der Ploeg
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.