Literature DB >> 19750794

Comparisons of musculoskeletal complaints and data entry between a sitting and a sit-stand workstation paradigm.

Britta Husemann1, Carolin Yvonne Von Mach, Daniel Borsotto, Kirsten Isabel Zepf, Jutta Scharnbacher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Seated working positions are often regarded as a cause for discomfort in the musculoskeletal system. Performing work in different working positions--that is, alternating between sitting and standing (sit-stand workstation paradigm)--could help reduce physical complaints.
OBJECTIVE: The questions were whether performing office work partly in a standing position leads to reduced complaints and whether standing would change the efficiency of data entry office work.
METHOD: We investigated the effect of a sit-stand workstation paradigmd during experimental data entry office work on physical and psychological complaints and data entry efficiency by conducting a randomized controlled trial with 60 male participants ages 18 to 35 years.
RESULTS: In this experiment, musculoskeletal complaints were reduced by a sit-stand workstation paradigm. A trend could be identified indicating a small but nonsignificant loss of efficiency in data entry while standing.
CONCLUSION: A sit-stand workstation paradigm reduces musculoskeletal complaints without considerably affecting data entry efficiency under the presented study conditions (young male participants, short duration, fixed and controlled sit-stand workstation paradigm, simulated experimental working condition). APPLICATION: According to the present data, implementing a sit-stand workstation paradigm can be an effective workplace health intervention to reduce musculoskeletal complaints. This experiment encourages further studies on the effectiveness of a sit-stand workstation paradigm. Experimental research and field studies that prove the reduction of complaints when introducing a sit-stand workstation paradigm in the workplace could be the basis for evidence-based recommendations regarding such interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19750794     DOI: 10.1177/0018720809338173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  16 in total

Review 1.  Changing the way we work: elevating energy expenditure with workstation alternatives.

Authors:  C Tudor-Locke; J M Schuna; L J Frensham; M Proenca
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 2.  Evidence of health risks associated with prolonged standing at work and intervention effectiveness.

Authors:  Thomas R Waters; Robert B Dick
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 1.625

3.  An intervention to reduce sitting and increase light-intensity physical activity at work: Design and rationale of the 'Stand & Move at Work' group randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthew P Buman; Sarah L Mullane; Meynard J Toledo; Sarah A Rydell; Glenn A Gaesser; Noe C Crespo; Peter Hannan; Linda Feltes; Brenna Vuong; Mark A Pereira
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  "Thinking on your feet": A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace.

Authors:  Anne Carolyn Grunseit; Josephine Yuk-Yin Chau; Hidde Pieter van der Ploeg; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers.

Authors:  Sharon P Parry; Pieter Coenen; Nipun Shrestha; Peter B O'Sullivan; Christopher G Maher; Leon M Straker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-17

6.  Reducing occupational sitting time and improving worker health: the Take-a-Stand Project, 2011.

Authors:  Nicolaas P Pronk; Abigail S Katz; Marcia Lowry; Jane Rodmyre Payfer
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Reducing office workers' sitting time: rationale and study design for the Stand Up Victoria cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  David W Dunstan; Glen Wiesner; Elizabeth G Eakin; Maike Neuhaus; Neville Owen; Anthony D LaMontagne; Marj Moodie; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Brianna S Fjeldsoe; Sheleigh Lawler; Genevieve N Healy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The effectiveness of sit-stand workstations for changing office workers' sitting time: results from the Stand@Work randomized controlled trial pilot.

Authors:  Josephine Y Chau; Michelle Daley; Scott Dunn; Anu Srinivasan; Anna Do; Adrian E Bauman; Hidde P van der Ploeg
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Installation of a stationary high desk in the workplace: effect of a 6-week intervention on physical activity.

Authors:  Motohiko Miyachi; Satoshi Kurita; Julien Tripette; Ryo Takahara; Yoshiko Yagi; Haruka Murakami
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Using sit-stand workstations to decrease sedentary time in office workers: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  Nirjhar Dutta; Gabriel A Koepp; Steven D Stovitz; James A Levine; Mark A Pereira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.