BACKGROUND: Seated working positions are often regarded as a cause for discomfort in the musculoskeletal system. Performing work in different working positions--that is, alternating between sitting and standing (sit-stand workstation paradigm)--could help reduce physical complaints. OBJECTIVE: The questions were whether performing office work partly in a standing position leads to reduced complaints and whether standing would change the efficiency of data entry office work. METHOD: We investigated the effect of a sit-stand workstation paradigmd during experimental data entry office work on physical and psychological complaints and data entry efficiency by conducting a randomized controlled trial with 60 male participants ages 18 to 35 years. RESULTS: In this experiment, musculoskeletal complaints were reduced by a sit-stand workstation paradigm. A trend could be identified indicating a small but nonsignificant loss of efficiency in data entry while standing. CONCLUSION: A sit-stand workstation paradigm reduces musculoskeletal complaints without considerably affecting data entry efficiency under the presented study conditions (young male participants, short duration, fixed and controlled sit-stand workstation paradigm, simulated experimental working condition). APPLICATION: According to the present data, implementing a sit-stand workstation paradigm can be an effective workplace health intervention to reduce musculoskeletal complaints. This experiment encourages further studies on the effectiveness of a sit-stand workstation paradigm. Experimental research and field studies that prove the reduction of complaints when introducing a sit-stand workstation paradigm in the workplace could be the basis for evidence-based recommendations regarding such interventions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Seated working positions are often regarded as a cause for discomfort in the musculoskeletal system. Performing work in different working positions--that is, alternating between sitting and standing (sit-stand workstation paradigm)--could help reduce physical complaints. OBJECTIVE: The questions were whether performing office work partly in a standing position leads to reduced complaints and whether standing would change the efficiency of data entry office work. METHOD: We investigated the effect of a sit-stand workstation paradigmd during experimental data entry office work on physical and psychological complaints and data entry efficiency by conducting a randomized controlled trial with 60 male participants ages 18 to 35 years. RESULTS: In this experiment, musculoskeletal complaints were reduced by a sit-stand workstation paradigm. A trend could be identified indicating a small but nonsignificant loss of efficiency in data entry while standing. CONCLUSION: A sit-stand workstation paradigm reduces musculoskeletal complaints without considerably affecting data entry efficiency under the presented study conditions (young male participants, short duration, fixed and controlled sit-stand workstation paradigm, simulated experimental working condition). APPLICATION: According to the present data, implementing a sit-stand workstation paradigm can be an effective workplace health intervention to reduce musculoskeletal complaints. This experiment encourages further studies on the effectiveness of a sit-stand workstation paradigm. Experimental research and field studies that prove the reduction of complaints when introducing a sit-stand workstation paradigm in the workplace could be the basis for evidence-based recommendations regarding such interventions.
Authors: Matthew P Buman; Sarah L Mullane; Meynard J Toledo; Sarah A Rydell; Glenn A Gaesser; Noe C Crespo; Peter Hannan; Linda Feltes; Brenna Vuong; Mark A Pereira Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Anne Carolyn Grunseit; Josephine Yuk-Yin Chau; Hidde Pieter van der Ploeg; Adrian Bauman Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sharon P Parry; Pieter Coenen; Nipun Shrestha; Peter B O'Sullivan; Christopher G Maher; Leon M Straker Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-11-17
Authors: David W Dunstan; Glen Wiesner; Elizabeth G Eakin; Maike Neuhaus; Neville Owen; Anthony D LaMontagne; Marj Moodie; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Brianna S Fjeldsoe; Sheleigh Lawler; Genevieve N Healy Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-11-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Josephine Y Chau; Michelle Daley; Scott Dunn; Anu Srinivasan; Anna Do; Adrian E Bauman; Hidde P van der Ploeg Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Nirjhar Dutta; Gabriel A Koepp; Steven D Stovitz; James A Levine; Mark A Pereira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 3.390